Arkansas Post AR006
1863-01-09 to 1863-01-11 · AR · Operations Against Vicksburg [December 1862-January 1863] · frozen result: Union · NPS summary (as listed)
From Fort Hindman, at Arkansas Post, Confederates had been disrupting Union shipping on the Mississippi River. Maj. Gen. John McClernand, therefore, undertook a combined force movement on Arkansas Post to capture it. Union boats began landing troops near Arkansas Post in the evening of January 9, 1863. The troops started up river towards Fort Hindman. Maj. Gen. William T. Sherman's corps overran Rebel trenches, and the enemy retreated to the protection of the fort and adjacent rifle-pits. Rear Adm. David Porter, on the 10th, moved his fleet towards Fort Hindman and bombarded it withdrawing at dusk. Union artillery fired on the fort from artillery positions across the river on the 11th, and the infantry moved into position for an attack. Union ironclads commenced shelling the fort and Porter's fleet passed it to cutoff any retreat. As a result of this envelopment, and the attack by McClernand's troops, the Confederate command surrendered in the afternoon. Although Union losses were high and the victory did not contribute to the capture of Vicksburg, it did eliminate one more impediment to Union shipping on the Mississippi.
Command responsibility (ledger v2)
US: none
Grade D under rule 5; echelon unknown. joint_command
Other candidates: David D. Porter, John A. McClernand
Navy and army listings. McClernand had formal command of the army and asked Porter to begin the bombardment; no passage shows one officer over both. The description credits the fleet's envelopment and McClernand's attack together, so no single force is shown compelling the result (rule 5, third case). Greene says Churchill surrendered the fort to McClernand; read as the force compelling the result, rule 5's second case would give McClernand (grade C). Kept at D because the description credits the envelopment and McClernand's attack together.
Acting Rear Admiralarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle AR006, belligerent US, fullname David D. Porter; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Major Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle AR006, belligerent US, fullname John A. McClernand; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…McClernand had assumed formal command on January 4thgreene-vicksburg-1862-selections-v1 · snapshot
0e7b68a692a7…asked him to begin the bombardment of the fort, as previously arranged.greene-vicksburg-1862-selections-v1 · snapshot
0e7b68a692a7…As a result of this envelopment, and the attack by McClernand's troops, the Confederate command surrenderedarnold-cwsac-battles, battle AR006; column description · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Confederate: Thomas J. Churchill
Grade A under rule 2; echelon detachment_or_post.
A cited passage states the command.
Brigadier Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle AR006, belligerent Confederate, fullname Thomas J. Churchill; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…the garrison numbered about 5,000 men under command of Brig. -Gen. T. J. Churchill.greene-vicksburg-1862-selections-v1 · snapshot
0e7b68a692a7…Side strength (ledger v3)
US: grade B, 28,940 (24,600–33,290)
compiled_dependencesingle_inputwhole_engagement_leakage
| Input | Class | Printed | Basis | Bound | Codes | Passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| us-lv | B | 28,944 | reported_effective | Army of the Mississippi, January 4, 1863, effectives [1] 28,944livermore-transcription-v1, p.98 (page image livermore-p98-image-v1) · snapshot e9fc742fdcb6… |
Confederate: grade A, 3,000 (2,850–7,000)
compiled_dependencewhole_engagement_leakage
| Input | Class | Printed | Basis | Bound | Codes | Passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cs-churchill | A | 3,000 | reported_effective | General Churchill reported that he had about 3000 effectiveslivermore-transcription-v1, p.98 (page image livermore-p98-image-v1) · snapshot e9fc742fdcb6… | ||
| cs-greene | B | 5,000 | unknown | dossier claim reported-force-scope | ||
| cs-sherman | C | 7,000 | unknown | adversary_or_hearsay_estimate | dossier claim reported-force-scope | |
| cs-lv | C | 4,564 | reported_effective | plus the loss in killed and wounded [2] 4,564livermore-transcription-v1, p.98 (page image livermore-p98-image-v1) · snapshot e9fc742fdcb6… |
Dossier claims
Draft dossier, revision vicksburg-1862-review-correction-2026-09-25. Claims are extraction records with their quoted passages, not historical adjudication. JSON
information
supportedunresolved Greene quotes Sherman's January 5 letter that McClernand brought the first news that Grant had fallen back, and that one boat carrying dispatches, the Blue Wing, 'has been captured by the enemy'. The letter does not name the capturing force, though it links 'that enemy on our rear and flank' to the threat to communications.
Attributed knowledge in a quoted letter; the original was not inspected.
General McClernand had brought intelli- gence, the first that had reached me, that General Grant had fallen backgreene-vicksburg-1862-selections-v1, p.83 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0e7b68a692a7…One boat, the Blue Wing, towing coal barges for the navy and carrying dis- patches, has been captured by the enemygreene-vicksburg-1862-selections-v1, p.83 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0e7b68a692a7…that enemy on our rear and flankgreene-vicksburg-1862-selections-v1, p.83 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0e7b68a692a7…logistics
supportedunresolved Greene says the fort's armament was two 9-inch and one 8-inch columbiads and 14 field guns, and that the gunboats' fire destroyed the larger guns and bombproofs.
Armament and material effect from one retrospective history; no inspected ordnance return.
The entire armament consisted of two 9-inch columbiads, one 8-inch columbiad, and 14 field gunsgreene-vicksburg-1862-selections-v1, p.84 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0e7b68a692a7…the larger guns being all destroyed, and the bonibproofs being knocked to pieces.greene-vicksburg-1862-selections-v1, p.86 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0e7b68a692a7…objectives
supportedunresolved NPS says the Confederates at Fort Hindman had been disrupting Union shipping and McClernand moved to capture it; Greene quotes Sherman proposing to reduce the post because it threatened the river and Union communications.
Stated objectives from a summary and a quoted letter; no inspected order.
Confederates had been disrupting Union shipping on the Mississippi River.nps-ar006-v1, Description · snapshot
325851001b3e…with that enemy on our rear and flank our communications would at all times be endangered.greene-vicksburg-1862-selections-v1, p.83 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0e7b68a692a7…outcome
supportedpost_outcome The frozen and live results read Union victory. Greene says Churchill surrendered the fort to McClernand about 4.30 p.m. on January 11, with its 17 guns and stores.
Retain the original result and engagement interval; later movements and campaign contribution are different measures. No new probabilities or individual causal credit. NPS's statement that the victory did not contribute to Vicksburg's capture is campaign context.
Churchill himself surrendered the fort to McClernand about 4.30 p.m.greene-vicksburg-1862-selections-v1, p.87 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0e7b68a692a7…including 17 pieces of artillerygreene-vicksburg-1862-selections-v1, p.88 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0e7b68a692a7…disputedpost_outcome The frozen casualty text reads 6,547 total (US 1,047; CS 5,500); the live NPS field reads 6096 total (US 1092; CS 5004;). Greene gives Union losses of 977 (129 killed, 831 wounded, 17 missing) exclusive of 31 on the gunboats, and Confederate losses of about 200 killed and wounded with 4,791 prisoners counted.
Original casualty returns were not inspected; preserve totals, categories, cutoffs and differences. No canonical reconciliation or casualty-based opening count; related actions must not be added without resolving population overlap. Prisoners dominate the Confederate figures and are not an opening strength.
6,547 total (US 1,047; CS 5,500)arnold-cwsac-battles, battle AR006; column casualties_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…The Union loss was, 129 killed, 831 wounded, and 17 missing; total, 977,greene-vicksburg-1862-selections-v1, p.88 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0e7b68a692a7…exclusive of 31 killed and wounded on the gunboats.greene-vicksburg-1862-selections-v1, p.88 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0e7b68a692a7…The Confederates lost about 200 men in killed and woundedgreene-vicksburg-1862-selections-v1, p.88 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0e7b68a692a7…was 4,791.greene-vicksburg-1862-selections-v1, p.88 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0e7b68a692a7…responsibility
disputedunresolved Greene says a cry to raise the white flag 'by order of General Churchill' ran along the Confederate line, that Churchill and his brigade commanders all denied authorizing it and its origin cannot be traced, and that one brigade commander at first refused to surrender until Churchill arrived.
The surrender's initiation is unresolved in the source; no listed commander receives automatic sole credit.
by order of General Churchill.greene-vicksburg-1862-selections-v1, p.87 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0e7b68a692a7…Churchill and his brigade commanders all deny hav- ing given any authority for such an order, and the origin of it cannot be traced.greene-vicksburg-1862-selections-v1, p.87 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0e7b68a692a7…one of the brigade com- manders opposed to Sherman refused to surrendergreene-vicksburg-1862-selections-v1, p.87 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0e7b68a692a7…supportedunresolved Greene says McClernand assumed formal command on January 4 and asked Porter to begin the bombardment as arranged. The frozen Union commanders are McClernand and Porter, and the frozen Confederate commander is Churchill. The live heading lists only Porter [US] and Churchill [CS], omitting McClernand, and ranks Porter Rear Admiral against the frozen Acting Rear Admiral.
Joint army-navy command; neither listed commander receives automatic sole credit. The heading rank is not adopted.
McClernand had assumed formal command on January 4thgreene-vicksburg-1862-selections-v1, p.83 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0e7b68a692a7…asked him to begin the bombardment of the fort, as previously arranged.greene-vicksburg-1862-selections-v1, p.86 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0e7b68a692a7…Acting Rear Admiralarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle AR006, belligerent US, fullname David D. Porter; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…strength
unknownunresolved
No inspected return establishes matched personnel at a common opening boundary. The frozen side-specific numerical strength bounds are blank (missing_numeric_strength), and the live NPS zeros are not measured absence. No figure in this pass is adopted as a simultaneous opening force.
disputedunresolved The frozen force field names the Army of the Mississippi and the Fort Hindman garrison; the live field reads zero. Greene says the garrison numbered about 5,000 under Churchill, quotes Sherman's letter that seven thousand were entrenched there, and says Porter's detachment carried 66 guns and the field artillery about 45 pieces.
Garrison estimates differ between Greene and the Sherman letter he quotes; no Union infantry count is given. None is adopted as matched opening strength. Live zeros are not measured absence.
Army of the Mississippi [US]; Fort Hindman Garrison [CS]arnold-cwsac-battles, battle AR006; column forces_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…the garrison numbered about 5,000 men under command of Brig. -Gen. T. J. Churchill.greene-vicksburg-1862-selections-v1, p.84 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0e7b68a692a7…where seven thou- sand of the enemy are intrenchedgreene-vicksburg-1862-selections-v1, p.83 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0e7b68a692a7…opened tire with their 66 pieces.greene-vicksburg-1862-selections-v1, p.86 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0e7b68a692a7…the field artillery, numbering about 45 piecesgreene-vicksburg-1862-selections-v1, p.86 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0e7b68a692a7…terrain
supportedinherited Greene describes Fort Hindman as a four-sided bastioned work about a hundred yards on a side on a bluff about twenty-five feet above the river, with a trench running about a mile to an impassable bayou; the assaulting infantry crossed about four hundred yards, partly open and partly broken by gullies.
Inherited works and ground from one retrospective history; no map verification or numerical terrain effect.
Fort Hindman was a four-sided bastioned work, about one hundred yards on a sidegreene-vicksburg-1862-selections-v1, p.84 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0e7b68a692a7…where it terminated in an impassable bayou.greene-vicksburg-1862-selections-v1, p.84 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0e7b68a692a7…They had a distance of about four hundred yards to crossgreene-vicksburg-1862-selections-v1, p.86 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0e7b68a692a7…Open questions
- Original returns, Churchill's and McClernand's reports, and the white flag's origin remain deferred.
- NPS/CWSAC is one family; Greene is one retrospective history by a non-participant Union engineer officer, founded on the Official Records. Reports and letters quoted inside Greene are not additional independently inspected families.
- No automatic commander attribution, causal campaign score, morale/readiness number or battle/campaign double counting.