Olustee FL005
1864-02-20 to 1864-02-20 · FL · Florida Expedition [February 1864] · frozen result: Confederate · NPS summary (as listed)
In February 1864, the commander of the Department of the South, Maj. Gen. Quincy A. Gillmore, launched an expedition into Florida to secure Union enclaves, sever Rebel supply routes, and recruit black soldiers. Brig. Gen. Truman Seymour moved deep into the state, occupying, destroying, and liberating, meeting little resistance on February 20, he approached Brig. Gen. Joseph Finegan's 5,000 Confederates entrenched near Olustee. One infantry brigade pushed out to meet Seymour's advance units. The Union forces attacked but were repulsed. The battle raged, and as Finegan committed the last of his reserves, the Union line broke and began to retreat. Finegan did not exploit the retreat, allowing most of the fleeing Union forces to reach Jacksonville.
Command responsibility (ledger v2)
US: Truman Seymour
Grade A under rule 2; echelon unknown.
Seymour's report states his plan of engagement and speaks of 'the troops under my command' (rule 2). Gillmore, the department commander, launched the expedition (description) but is not shown directing the battle; Seymour says he did not think he was violating the general plan. No superior is recorded.
Brigadier Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle FL005, belligerent US, fullname Truman Seymour; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…My intention was to engage the enemy in front with the artilleryor35-1-seymour-olustee-selections-v1 · snapshot
ddcf66377875…the excellent character of the troops under my commandor35-1-seymour-olustee-selections-v1 · snapshot
ddcf66377875…Confederate: Joseph Finegan
Grade A under rule 2; echelon unknown.
Finegan's report has him ordering the cavalry forward to skirmish and draw the enemy on, then ordering Colquitt forward and going on the field himself (rule 2). Colquitt's advance and his advice on the pursuit are subordinate context.
Brigadier Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle FL005, belligerent Confederate, fullname Joseph Finegan; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…I ordered the cavalry, under Col. C. Smith, Second Florida Cavalry, supported by the Sixty- fourth Georgiaor35-1-finegan-olustee-selections-v1 · snapshot
38aedd6f1d9d…to advance and skirmish with the enemy and draw them to our works.or35-1-finegan-olustee-selections-v1 · snapshot
38aedd6f1d9d…Side strength (ledger v3)
US: grade A, 5,120 (4,860–5,370)
basis_mixedcompiled_dependencesingle_inputwhole_engagement_leakage
| Input | Class | Printed | Basis | Bound | Codes | Passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| us-lv | A | 5,115 | reported_effective | Seymour's command, effectives, estimated at 93 per cent. of entire force 5,115 [a]livermore-transcription-v2, p.109 (page image livermore-p109-image-v1) · snapshot 688ea7363f1b… | ||
| us-seymour | bound | 5,500 | unknown | upper | one_sided_bound | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
| us-finegan-inf | bound | 8,000 | unknown | lower | adversary_or_hearsay_estimatepartial_scope | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
| us-finegan-cav | bound | 1,400 | unknown | lower | adversary_or_hearsay_estimatepartial_scope | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
Confederate: grade A, 5,000 (4,750–5,250)
basis_mixedcompiled_dependencederivation_unknownwhole_engagement_leakage
| Input | Class | Printed | Basis | Bound | Codes | Passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cs-lv | A | 5,200 | reported_effective | Finegan's command, effectives 5,200 [b]livermore-transcription-v2, p.109 (page image livermore-p109-image-v1) · snapshot 688ea7363f1b… | ||
| cs-nps | A | 5,000 | reported_engaged | derivation_unknown | dossier claim reported-force-scope | |
| cs-nps-desc | B | 5,000 | unknown | derivation_unknown | dossier claim reported-force-scope | |
| cs-seymour-est | C | 4,000–5,000 | unknown | adversary_or_hearsay_estimate | dossier claim reported-force-scope | |
| cs-finegan-inf | bound | 4,600 | reported_effective | lower | partial_scope | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
Dossier claims
Draft dossier, revision . Claims are extraction records with their quoted passages, not historical adjudication. JSON
information
supportedunresolved Seymour believed he had accurate information on the enemy's strength and thought Hardee might be at Lake City; Finegan's advance to meet him was predicated on information that the Union force had only three infantry regiments, and on February 13 he wrote that the enemy credited him with a much larger force than he had.
Contemporary beliefs stated by the two commanders; neither is verified. No original reconnaissance, order or message chain was inspected to establish contemporary knowledge. Surprise in a summary does not independently establish what each commander knew.
Accurate information, it was believed, as to the enemy’s strength had been obtained,or35-1-seymour-olustee-selections-v1, p.288 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ddcf66377875…There is reason to believe that General Hardee is in Lake City now,or35-1-seymour-olustee-selections-v1, p.284 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ddcf66377875…This movement was predicated on the information that the enemy had only three regiments of infantry,or35-1-finegan-olustee-selections-v1, p.332 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
38aedd6f1d9d…They give me credit for a much larger force than I have.or35-1-finegan-olustee-selections-v1, p.326 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
38aedd6f1d9d…logistics
supportedunresolved Seymour wrote on February 17 that delays with the locomotive had kept him where his command could be fed and that he would advance without supplies; on February 22 he said Lake City could not be supplied by the railroad transportation at his command; after the battle he left six guns for loss of horses and some badly wounded for want of means to move them. Finegan halted the pursuit partly for the troops' fatigue and the absence of rations, asked for ammunition, and handed over his army deficient only in ordnance stores.
Statements in the two commanders' reports; no supply or ordnance returns inspected.
have compelled me to remain where my command could be fed ;or35-1-seymour-olustee-selections-v1, p.284 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ddcf66377875…But now I propose to go without supplies,or35-1-seymour-olustee-selections-v1, p.284 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ddcf66377875…because it could not be supplied with the (to this movement) utterly worthless rail- road transportation at my command,or35-1-seymour-olustee-selections-v1, p.287 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ddcf66377875…From loss of horses alone, I was compelled to leave six guns on the field,or35-1-seymour-olustee-selections-v1, p.289 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ddcf66377875…a small portion of the badly wounded were left in the power of the enemy from insufficient means to remove them.or35-1-seymour-olustee-selections-v1, p.289 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ddcf66377875…the fatigue of the troops, the absence of rations,or35-1-finegan-olustee-selections-v1, p.332 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
38aedd6f1d9d…I respectfully request that a full supply of ammunition for this command be forwarded as soon as possible.or35-1-finegan-olustee-selections-v1, p.327 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
38aedd6f1d9d…deficient only in ordnance stores,or35-1-finegan-olustee-selections-v1, p.333 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
38aedd6f1d9d…objectives
disputedunresolved Seymour advanced to take Lake City and, if successful, destroy the railroad at the Suwannee River, which he calls the general plan of operations; on February 22 he denied violating that plan. Finegan's object was to draw the enemy to his works and, once engaged, to press him. NPS gives Gillmore's aims as securing enclaves, severing supply routes and recruiting black soldiers.
Stated aims; Gillmore's own statement of the plan (and his later indorsement disputing Seymour's authority) was read but not selected.
with the intention of advancing on Lake City, and, if successful, of destroying the railroad communication between East and West Florida at the Suwannee River,or35-1-seymour-olustee-selections-v1, p.288 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ddcf66377875…I did not consider that I was committing any violation of the general plan of operations,or35-1-seymour-olustee-selections-v1, p.287 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ddcf66377875…to advance and skirmish with the enemy and draw them to our works.or35-1-finegan-olustee-selections-v1, p.331 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
38aedd6f1d9d…to secure Union enclaves, sever Rebel supply routes, and recruit black soldiers.nps-fl005-v1, Description · snapshot
b6fd05468888…outcome
disputedpost_outcome The frozen and live results read Confederate victory. Seymour says the troops withdrew in perfect order after a struggle that ended at dusk and that the battle might fairly have been a victory; Finegan says the Union lines gave way entirely after four and a half hours, calls the victory complete and the rout complete. NPS says Finegan did not exploit the retreat.
Retain the original result and engagement interval; later movements and campaign contribution are different measures. No new probabilities or individual causal credit.
the troops were withdrawn in perfect order to Sanderson and then to the Saint Mary’s,or35-1-seymour-olustee-selections-v1, p.289 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ddcf66377875…this might fairly have been a victory.or35-1-seymour-olustee-selections-v1, p.290 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ddcf66377875…the battle lasted for four and a half hours.or35-1-finegan-olustee-selections-v1, p.332 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
38aedd6f1d9d…The victory was complete and the enemy retired in rapid retreat,or35-1-finegan-olustee-selections-v1, p.333 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
38aedd6f1d9d…as their rout was com- plete.or35-1-finegan-olustee-selections-v1, p.327 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
38aedd6f1d9d…disputedpost_outcome The frozen casualty text reads 2,806 total (US 1,860; CS 946), as does the live page. Seymour's return's total row reads in OCR 11 officers and 192 men killed, 44 and 1,110 wounded, 2 and 504 missing, 55 and 1,806 in all, aggregate 1,861 (followed by an unexplained '1,801 120'). Finegan reports his loss as 93 killed and 841 wounded, while the compiled Confederate table's grand total reads 946; he puts the Union loss at not less than 2,000 or 2,500, with 418 wounded removed, about 400 dead buried and nearly 200 prisoners. Seymour left six guns on the field (five on February 22); Finegan claims five captured.
Original casualty returns were not inspected; preserve totals, categories, cutoffs and differences. No canonical reconciliation or casualty-based opening count; related actions must not be added without resolving population overlap. Finegan's 93 killed and 841 wounded and the table's 946, and Seymour's 1,861 against the frozen 1,860, are preserved; the gun counts differ.
2,806 total (US 1,860; CS 946)arnold-cwsac-battles, battle FL005; column casualties_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Total 11 | 192 44 1,110 2 504 55 1,806 1,861 1,801 120or35-1-seymour-olustee-selections-v1, p.298 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ddcf66377875…Our loss in the engagement was 93 killed and 841 wounded,or35-1-finegan-olustee-selections-v1, p.333 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
38aedd6f1d9d…Grand total 86 49 798 6 946or35-1-finegan-olustee-selections-v1, p.337 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
38aedd6f1d9d…Their loss cannot be less than 2,000 or 2,500 men,or35-1-finegan-olustee-selections-v1, p.333 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
38aedd6f1d9d…Four hundred and eighteen of their wounded wereor35-1-finegan-olustee-selections-v1, p.332 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
38aedd6f1d9d…leaving upon the field five guns,or35-1-seymour-olustee-selections-v1, p.287 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ddcf66377875…5 superior guns,or35-1-finegan-olustee-selections-v1, p.333 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
38aedd6f1d9d…responsibility
supportedunresolved Seymour directed the attack, blaming the failure on the Seventh New Hampshire's breaking and praising Barton's brigade and the artillery. Finegan ordered Colquitt forward, sent the whole command after him and went on the field; he withdrew the pursuit order on Colquitt's advice and says his cavalry commander failed to execute repeated pursuit orders. The frozen commanders are Brigadier Generals Truman Seymour (US) and Joseph Finegan (CS).
Command roles from interested reports; neither listed commander receives automatic sole credit.
before it broke in confusion,or35-1-seymour-olustee-selections-v1, p.289 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ddcf66377875…The conduct of Colonel Barton’s brigade was glorious,or35-1-seymour-olustee-selections-v1, p.289 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ddcf66377875…I ordered Brigadier-Gen- eral Colquitt, commanding First Brigade, to advance with three of his regimentsor35-1-finegan-olustee-selections-v1, p.332 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
38aedd6f1d9d…and myself went upon the field.or35-1-finegan-olustee-selections-v1, p.332 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
38aedd6f1d9d…in def- erence to his suggestion of the fatigue of the troops,or35-1-finegan-olustee-selections-v1, p.332 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
38aedd6f1d9d…But through some misapprehension these orders failed to be executed by him,or35-1-finegan-olustee-selections-v1, p.332 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
38aedd6f1d9d…Brigadier Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle FL005, belligerent US, fullname Truman Seymour; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Brigadier Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle FL005, belligerent Confederate, fullname Joseph Finegan; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…strength
unknownunresolved
No inspected return establishes matched personnel at a common opening boundary. The frozen side-specific numerical strength bounds are blank (missing_numeric_strength). No figure in this pass is adopted as a simultaneous opening force.
disputedunresolved The frozen force text reads Division (US) and District of East Florida (CS), with blank numerical bounds; the live page gives 5000 total (US 0; CS 5000) and describes Finegan's 5,000 Confederates. Seymour's March 25 report puts his own force near 5,500 officers and men and sixteen guns; on February 22 he wrote that the enemy was supposed, on the best information he could get, to be 4,000 to 5,000 strong, and on March 25 that the disparity in numbers was too great. Finegan's February 26 report gives his effective force as 4,600 infantry, less than 600 cavalry and three batteries of twelve guns, estimates the Union force at twelve infantry regiments, about 8,000, with 1,400 cavalry, and says he had waited for several days with a force less than 2,000 strong before reinforcements arrived; on February 13 he had about 1,800 infantry and 450 cavalry at Olustee.
Each commander's count of his own side is paired with a higher estimate of the other. The Confederate figures are for different dates (February 13 and the eve of battle). The live zero for the Union side is not measured absence. None is adopted as a matched opening strength.
Division [US]; District of East Florida [CS]arnold-cwsac-battles, battle FL005; column forces_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Brig. Gen. Joseph Finegan's 5,000 Confederates entrenched near Olustee.nps-fl005-v1, Description · snapshot
b6fd05468888…The entire force near 5,500 officers and men and sixteen guns.or35-1-seymour-olustee-selections-v1, p.288 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ddcf66377875…(supposed to be from 4,000 to 5,000 strong, according to the best information I could obtain)or35-1-seymour-olustee-selections-v1, p.287 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ddcf66377875…But the disparity in numbers was too great and the defense too obstinate to permit of decisive results.or35-1-seymour-olustee-selections-v1, p.289 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ddcf66377875…my whole effective force being as follows : Infantry, 4,600 ; cavalry, less than 600 ; artillery, 3 batteries — twelve guns.or35-1-finegan-olustee-selections-v1, p.331 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
38aedd6f1d9d…estimated at 8,000, and some artillery (number of guns unknown), and 1,400 cavalry.or35-1-finegan-olustee-selections-v1, p.331 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
38aedd6f1d9d…with a force less than 2,000 strong, awaited the enemy’s advance.or35-1-finegan-olustee-selections-v1, p.331 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
38aedd6f1d9d…Iam intrenched at the Olustee to-night and have about 1,800 in- fantry, 450 cavalry, and two batteries, and one section of artillery.or35-1-finegan-olustee-selections-v1, p.326 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
38aedd6f1d9d…terrain
disputedunresolved Seymour says the ground was firm and even, covered with pine timber but without underbrush, and on February 22 that he came upon the enemy intrenched; NPS says the Confederates were entrenched near Olustee. Finegan says he had field-works thrown up at Ocean Pond, the only strong position between Lake City and Barber's, but, apprehending that the enemy would not approach them, sent Colquitt forward to engage and then advanced the whole command.
Whether the fighting took place at the Confederate works is disputed between the reports; no map verification.
The ground was favorable for the movement of troops, being firm and even, and although covered with pine timber was de- void of underbrush.or35-1-seymour-olustee-selections-v1, p.288 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ddcf66377875…I came upon the enemy, intrenched,or35-1-seymour-olustee-selections-v1, p.287 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ddcf66377875…occupied the only strong position between Lake City and Barber’s. Here I had field-works thrown up,or35-1-finegan-olustee-selections-v1, p.331 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
38aedd6f1d9d…Apprehending that the enemy was too cautious to approach our works,or35-1-finegan-olustee-selections-v1, p.332 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
38aedd6f1d9d…I ordered in quick succession, within the space of an hour, the whole command to advance to the front as a supporting force,or35-1-finegan-olustee-selections-v1, p.332 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
38aedd6f1d9d…Open questions
- Gillmore's reports and his November 1, 1865 indorsement disputing Seymour's numbers and authority (read, not selected), the brigade, regimental and artillery reports (Nos. 3-15 and 18-27), Beauregard's and Gardner's papers and returns before the battle remain deferred.
- No history covering Olustee was found in this pass; Samuel Jones's Siege of Charleston ends in late 1863.
- NPS/CWSAC (NPS battle page and frozen Arnold rows) is one family. Truman Seymour's February 17, 22 and 25 and March 25, 1864 papers and Joseph Finegan's February 13, 23 and 26 reports (Official Records I, XXXV part 1) are interested accounts by the opposing commanders; the Confederate casualty addenda were compiled from nominal lists. Official Records volumes are shared containers, not additional witnesses. Report dates are not event times or proof of contemporary knowledge.
- No automatic commander attribution, causal campaign score, morale/readiness number or battle/campaign double counting.