Kennesaw Mountain GA015
1864-06-27 to 1864-06-27 · GA · Atlanta Campaign [May-September 1864] · frozen result: Confederate · NPS summary (as listed)
On the night of June 18-19, Gen. Joseph E. Johnston, fearing envelopment, withdrew his army to a new, previously selected position astride Kennesaw Mountain. This entrenched arc-shaped line, to the north and west of Marietta, protected the Western & Atlantic Railroad, the supply link to Atlanta. Having defeated General John B. Hood troops at Kolb's Farm on the 22nd, Sherman was sure that Johnston had stretched his line too thin and, therefore, decided on a frontal attack with some diversions on the flanks. On the morning of June 27, Sherman sent his troops forward after an artillery bombardment. At first, they made some headway overrunning Confederate pickets south of the Burnt Hickory Road, but attacking an enemy that was dug in was futile. The fighting ended by noon, and Sherman suffered high casualties.
Command responsibility (ledger v2)
US: William T. Sherman
Grade A under rule 2; echelon army.
Rule 2, single listing. The description and Cox have Sherman deciding on the assault and fixing its time; Thomas, McPherson and Schofield were ordered to their parts (Cox): subordinate context.
Major Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle GA015, belligerent US, fullname William T. Sherman; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Sherman was sure that Johnston had stretched his line too thin and, therefore, decided on a frontal attack with some diversions on the flanks.arnold-cwsac-battles, battle GA015; column description · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Sherman therefore determined on a seri ous effort to break through Johnston's intrenchmentscox-atlanta-selections-v2 · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…Confederate: Joseph E. Johnston
Grade A under rule 2; echelon army.
Rule 2, single listing. The description has Johnston withdrawing his army to the Kennesaw line, and Johnston's report covers the army under his command. The assaults fell on Hardee's corps (Cheatham's and Cleburne's divisions) and Loring's corps (Johnston; Cox): subordinate context. Loring commanded Polk's corps after Polk's death on June 14 (Johnston).
Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle GA015, belligerent Confederate, fullname Joseph E. Johnston; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Gen. Joseph E. Johnston, fearing envelopment, withdrew his army to a new, previously selected position astride Kennesaw Mountain.arnold-cwsac-battles, battle GA015; column description · snapshot
952b5d08402a…C. S. Army, commanding Army of Tennessee, of operations December 27, 1863 -July 17, 1864or38-3-johnston-atlanta-selections-v1 · snapshot
63bf7b8586cd…Side strength (ledger v3)
US: grade B, 16,000 (13,600–20,700)
applicability_unresolvedbasis_mixedderivation_unknownwhole_engagement_leakage
| Input | Class | Printed | Basis | Bound | Codes | Passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| us-lv-engaged | bound | 16,225 | reported_engaged | lower | derived_from_lossespartial_scope | Casualties June 27, as below 2,051 Total engaged [7] 16,225livermore-transcription-v2, p.120 (page image livermore-p120-image-v1) · snapshot 688ea7363f1b… |
| us-lv-eff | bound | 14,174 | reported_effective | lower | partial_scopepost_engagement_state | Effectives estimated at 93 per cent. 14,174livermore-transcription-v2, p.120 (page image livermore-p120-image-v1) · snapshot 688ea7363f1b… |
| us-lv-pfd | bound | 15,241 | present_for_duty | lower | partial_scopepost_engagement_state | Present for duty June 30 in 2d brigade, 4th division, 15th corps [6] 1,383 [a] 15,241livermore-transcription-v2, p.120 (page image livermore-p120-image-v1) · snapshot 688ea7363f1b… |
| us-bodart-total | C | 18,000 | unknown | derivation_unknownscope_unresolved | 18000arnold-bodart1908-forces, battle_id 37, belligerent US; column strength · snapshot 92882238b24d… | |
| us-clodfelter | B | 16,000 | unknown | derivation_unknown | 16000arnold-clodfelter-forces, battle_id Kennesaw Mountain, belligerent US; column strength · snapshot 96430f3626d3… |
Confederate: grade B, 17,700 (5,100–20,360)
applicability_unresolvedbasis_mixedderivation_unknownwhole_engagement_leakage
| Input | Class | Printed | Basis | Bound | Codes | Passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cs-lv-engaged | bound | 17,733 | reported_engaged | lower | derived_from_lossespartial_scope | Losses June 27, as below 432 Total engaged 17,733livermore-transcription-v2, p.121 (page image livermore-p121-image-v1) · snapshot 688ea7363f1b… |
| cs-lv-eff | bound | 17,301 | reported_effective | lower | partial_scopepost_engagement_state | Effectives estimated at 93 per cent. 17,301livermore-transcription-v2, p.121 (page image livermore-p121-image-v1) · snapshot 688ea7363f1b… |
| cs-lv-pfd | bound | 18,604 | present_for_duty | lower | partial_scopepost_engagement_state | and 3/4 of artillery in Army of Mississippi 18,604livermore-transcription-v2, p.121 (page image livermore-p121-image-v1) · snapshot 688ea7363f1b… |
| cs-bodart-total | C | 6,000 | unknown | derivation_unknownscope_unresolved | 6000arnold-bodart1908-forces, battle_id 37, belligerent Confederate; column strength · snapshot 92882238b24d… | |
| cs-clodfelter | B | 17,700 | unknown | derivation_unknown | 17700arnold-clodfelter-forces, battle_id Kennesaw Mountain, belligerent Confederate; column strength · snapshot 96430f3626d3… |
Dossier claims
Draft dossier, revision atlanta-review-correction-2026-09-25. Claims are extraction records with their quoted passages, not historical adjudication. JSON
information
supportedunresolved Cox says Sherman thought Johnston's line must be very attenuated, and that once the heads of the columns developed the Confederates knew these alone needed attention and concentrated on them. NPS says Sherman was sure Johnston had stretched his line too thin.
Attributed knowledge from an interested history and a summary; no message log inspected.
it still seemed probable that the enemy's whole line must be very attenuated,cox-atlanta-selections-v2, p.117 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…the enemy knew that these alone needed serious attention,cox-atlanta-selections-v2, p.128 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…Sherman was sure that Johnston had stretched his line too thinnps-ga015-v1, Description · snapshot
e613f246c84d…logistics
supportedunresolved Cox says Sherman's difficulties were almost wholly due to supply, that the rains prevented lengthening the distance from depots, and that accumulating supplies for a move by the right was slow.
Retrospective explanation from an interested history; no supply return inspected. It concerns the decision context, not the assault itself.
SHERMAN'S embarrassments at this juncture were almost altogether due to the trouble in keeping his army supplied.cox-atlanta-selections-v2, p.116 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…To do this required, however, an ac cumulation of supplies, and getting ahead of the daily de mand was slow work in the condition of roads and railways,cox-atlanta-selections-v2, p.117 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…objectives
supportedunresolved Cox says Sherman rejected Thomas's suggestion of regular approaches and determined on a serious effort to break the line, reasoning that a successful assault would be decisive; holding Johnston so he could not aid Lee was one motive for continuous operations. NPS describes a frontal attack with diversions on the flanks.
Stated reasoning from an interested history and a summary; not a causal estimate.
Thomas suggested an approach to the enemy's works by regular sap,cox-atlanta-selections-v2, p.118 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…Sherman therefore determined on a seri ous effort to break through Johnston's intrenchments,cox-atlanta-selections-v2, p.118 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…If an assault succeeded it would be a decisive event.cox-atlanta-selections-v2, p.118 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…The necessity of holding Johnston with such a grip that he could not detach aid to Lee in Virginia was one of the motives for active operations in front and continuously ;cox-atlanta-selections-v2, p.130 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…decided on a frontal attack with some diversions on the flanks.nps-ga015-v1, Description · snapshot
e613f246c84d…outcome
supportedpost_outcome The frozen and live results read Confederate victory. Johnston says the advance was everywhere repulsed with heavy loss. Cox says the one chance to break through was tried and lost; Sherman called Schofield's position beyond Olley's Creek the only advantage of the day. NPS says the fighting ended by noon with high Union casualties.
Retain the original result and engagement interval; later movements and campaign contribution are different measures. No new probabilities or individual causal credit.
but was everywhere repulsed with heavy loss.or38-3-johnston-atlanta-selections-v1, p.617 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
63bf7b8586cd…The one chance to break through had been bravely tried and lost,cox-atlanta-selections-v2, p.128 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…the only advantage of the day.cox-atlanta-selections-v2, p.130 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…The fighting ended by noon, and Sherman suffered high casualties.nps-ga015-v1, Description · snapshot
e613f246c84d…disputedpost_outcome The frozen and live casualty texts read 4,000 (US 3,000; CS 1,000). Cox gives Sherman's loss as about twenty-five hundred, says about eight hundred fell at the head of each of the three assaults, and that Johnston admits over five hundred. Johnston reports Hardee's figures of 195 lost in Cheatham's division against 2,000 enemy and 11 in Cleburne's against 1,000, and Loring's 236 against Union estimates of 2,500 to 3,000.
Original casualty returns were not inspected; preserve totals, categories, cutoffs and differences. No canonical reconciliation or casualty-based opening count; related actions must not be added without resolving population overlap. Johnston's own-side components sum to 442 (a computation here, excluding other commands); the enemy figures are estimates, and Cox's 2,500 and the frozen 3,000 differ.
4,000 total (US 3,000; CS 1,000)arnold-cwsac-battles, battle GA015; column casualties_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Sherman's losses during the day were about twenty-five hundred in all, and Johnston admits over five hundred cas ualties.cox-atlanta-selections-v2, p.127 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…About eight hundred men had fallen at the head of each of these three assaults before its progress was stopped,cox-atlanta-selections-v2, p.128 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…Lieutenant-General Hardee reports that Cheatham’s division lost in killed, wounded, and missing 195 ; the enemy opposed to it, by the statement of a staff officer subsequently captured, 2,000.or38-3-johnston-atlanta-selections-v1, p.617 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
63bf7b8586cd…The loss of Cleburne’s division, 11 ; that of the enemy in his front, 1,000.or38-3-johnston-atlanta-selections-v1, p.617 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
63bf7b8586cd…Major-General Loring reported 236 of his corps killed, wounded, and missing, and the loss of the enemy, by their own estimates, at between 2,500 and 3,000,or38-3-johnston-atlanta-selections-v1, p.617 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
63bf7b8586cd…responsibility
supportedunresolved Cox records Harker mortally wounded and Daniel McCook and Harmon fallen, judges the division and corps commanders wise in stopping, and says Sherman frankly admitted that the unfavourable chances had prevailed. Johnston says the assaults fell hardest on Cheatham's, Cleburne's, French's and Featherston's divisions; Cox says Logan's attack fell on the left of Loring's corps (French's and Walker's divisions). The frozen commanders are General Joseph E. Johnston and Major General William T. Sherman; the live page gives General William Sherman and Lieutenant Colonel Joseph Johnston.
Attributed judgments from interested accounts; Johnston and Cox name different divisions of Loring's corps (Featherston's; Walker's), a minor unresolved discrepancy; the frozen commanders do not receive automatic sole credit, and the live ranks are not adopted.
Logan's attack had fallen upon the left of Loring's corps (French's and Walker's divisions),cox-atlanta-selections-v2, p.126 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…General Harker, with a gallantry already famous in the army, attempting to renew the assault, was mortally wounded,cox-atlanta-selections-v2, p.125 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…Colonel Daniel McCook and his second in command, Colonel Harmon, both fell in the assault,cox-atlanta-selections-v2, p.125 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…but the division and corps commanders were wise in judging when the effort had failed.cox-atlanta-selections-v2, p.129 (inferred page: the p.129 running head reads "12Q" in OCR; not checked against print) · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…the unfav orable ones had prevailed,cox-atlanta-selections-v2, p.130 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…The assaults were most vigorous on Cheatham’s and Cleburne’s divisions, of Hardee’s corps, and French’s and Featherston’s, of Loring’s.or38-3-johnston-atlanta-selections-v1, p.617 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
63bf7b8586cd…Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle GA015, belligerent Confederate, fullname Joseph E. Johnston; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Major Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle GA015, belligerent US, fullname William T. Sherman; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…strength
unknownunresolved
No inspected return establishes matched personnel at a common opening boundary. The frozen side-specific numerical strength bounds are blank (missing_numeric_strength). No figure in this pass is adopted as a simultaneous opening force.
disputedunresolved The frozen force fields name the two armies without counts; the live field reads zero. Cox says only three points were selected for assault, the middle attacked by two columns each with a two-company front; he names Newton's and Davis's divisions and Morgan L. Smith's division with Walcutt's brigade, and says Loring's corps held the mountain. Johnston calls it a general advance.
Formations, not counts; the scope of the attack is described differently. None is adopted. The live zero is not measured absence.
Military Division of the Mississippi [US]; Army of Tennessee [CS]arnold-cwsac-battles, battle GA015; column forces_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…It must be remembered that only three points in the ene my's line had been selected for assault.cox-atlanta-selections-v2, p.127 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…The middle of these was attacked by two columns, having each a front of two companies only,cox-atlanta-selections-v2, p.127 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…Newton arranged his division with Harker's and Wagner's brigades in front, and Kimball's in reserve.cox-atlanta-selections-v2, p.121 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…Davis formed his division in front of Stanley's trenches,cox-atlanta-selections-v2, p.122 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…Logan ordered the attack to be made by the division of Morgan L. Smith,cox-atlanta-selections-v2, p.120 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…was held by Loring's corps and whatever re inforcements he might recently have got.cox-atlanta-selections-v2, p.117 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…the enemy made a gen¬ eral advance,or38-3-johnston-atlanta-selections-v1, p.617 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
63bf7b8586cd…terrain
supportedunresolved Cox says Newton's columns were stopped at the entanglement of felled trees before the works, that Smith's division climbed a steep rocky slope choked with felled trees, and that Davis's men crossed rocky, rough and tangled ground. He cites French's report on how the mountain let the Confederates watch every Union movement. NPS says attacking an entrenched enemy was futile.
Ground described by an interested history and a summary; no map verification. The Kennesaw line was occupied on June 19 and prepared by Confederate engineers, but no inherited tag is assigned without a timing review.
Newton's columns were not checked till they reached the entanglement in front of the enemy's works.cox-atlanta-selections-v2, p.125 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…Beyond these the slope of the mountain was steep and rocky, and felled trees formed so thick an entanglement that the advance became slow,cox-atlanta-selections-v2, p.126 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…Davis's men had to pass over rocky and rough ground, part of it covered with the forest and tangled with undergrowth.cox-atlanta-selections-v2, p.125 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…could be watched and noted from his rocky outlook.cox-atlanta-selections-v2, pp.127–128 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d7ae08f7388f…but attacking an enemy that was dug in was futile.nps-ga015-v1, Description · snapshot
e613f246c84d…Open questions
- Sherman's, Thomas's, Howard's, Palmer's, Newton's, Davis's and Logan's June 28 reports (the last seen at a range boundary), French's report, Hardee's Kenesaw loss addendum (read, not selected) and the compiled returns remain deferred.
- NPS/CWSAC (the live battle page and the frozen Arnold rows) is one family. Cox's Atlanta (Scribner, 1882) is a second: a retrospective Union history by the Twenty-third Corps division commander, drawing on official reports and memoirs, so it is not independent of them. Johnston's October 20, 1864 report, printed in Volume XXXVIII Part 3, is a third family (interested Confederate account). Official Records Series I Volume XXXVIII is a shared container, not an additional witness. Report dates are not event times or proof of contemporary knowledge.
- No automatic commander attribution, causal campaign score, morale/readiness number or battle/campaign double counting. Campaign-wide strength and loss totals are context, not assigned to one record.