Paducah KY010
1864-03-25 to 1864-03-25 · KY · Forrest's Expedition into West Tennessee and Kentucky [March-April 1864] · frozen result: Confederate · NPS summary (as listed)
In March 1864, Forrest set out from Columbus, Mississippi, with a force of less than 3,000 men on a multipurpose expedition (recruit, reoutfit, disperse Yankees, etc.) into West Tennessee and Kentucky. Forrest arrived in Paducah on March 25 and quickly occupied the town. The Union garrison of 650 men under the command of Col. Stephen G. Hicks retired to Fort Anderson, in the town's west end. Hicks had support from two gunboats on the Ohio River and refused to surrender, while shelling the area with his artillery. Most of Forrest's command destroyed unwanted supplies, loaded what they wanted, and rounded up horses and mules. A small segment of Forrest's command assaulted Fort Anderson and was repulsed, suffering heavy casualties. Soon afterwards, Forrest's men withdrew. In reporting the raid on the town, many newspapers stated that Forrest had not found more than a hundred fine horses hidden during the raid. As a result, one of Forrest's subordinate officers led a force back into Paducah in mid-April and seized the infamous horses. Although this was a Confederate victory, other than the destruction of supplies and capture of animals, no lasting results occurred. It did, however, warn the Federals that Forrest, or someone like him, could strike anywhere at any time.
Command responsibility (ledger v2)
US: Stephen G. Hicks
Grade C under rule 5; echelon detachment_or_post. joint_command
Other candidates: James W. Shirk
Army and navy listings; no inspected passage shows one officer over both. The description puts the garrison under Hicks, which held Fort Anderson, refused to surrender and repulsed the assault, with the gunboats in support; Hicks's report names the gunboats' captains as Smith and O'Neil and does not name the listed Shirk. The garrison is read as the force that decided the side's part in the result (rule 5, second case). The side lost the recorded result, so 'compelling the result' is applied to its defence; if that reading is rejected, rule 5's third case gives grade D.
Colonelarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle KY010, belligerent US, fullname Stephen G. Hicks; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Lieutenant Commanderarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle KY010, belligerent US, fullname James W. Shirk; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…The Union garrison of 650 men under the command of Col. Stephen G. Hicks retired to Fort Andersonarnold-cwsac-battles, battle KY010; column description · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Hicks had support from two gunboats on the Ohio River and refused to surrenderarnold-cwsac-battles, battle KY010; column description · snapshot
952b5d08402a…in which you demand the unconditional surrender of the forces under my command.or32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1 · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…The gun-boats Peosta, Captain Smith, and Paw Paw, Captain O’Neil, were presentor32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1 · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…Confederate: Nathan Bedford Forrest
Grade A under rule 2; echelon unknown.
The description has Forrest arriving and occupying the town, and Forrest's surrender demand, printed in Hicks's report, is signed as commanding the Confederate troops (rule 2). The assault on the fort was by a small segment of his command; Hicks says A. P. Thompson was killed in the third assault (subordinate context). No inspected passage says who ordered the assaults.
Major Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle KY010, belligerent Confederate, fullname Nathan Bedford Forrest; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Having a force amply sufficient to carry your works and reduce the placeor32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1 · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…Forrest arrived in Paducah on March 25 and quickly occupied the town.arnold-cwsac-battles, battle KY010; column description · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Side strength (ledger v3)
US: grade A, 650 (620–700)
compiled_dependencederivation_unknownwhole_engagement_leakage
| Input | Class | Printed | Basis | Bound | Codes | Passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| us-cw | A | 650 | reported_engaged | derivation_unknown | ||
| us-nps | A | 650 | reported_engaged | derivation_unknown | dossier claim reported-force-scope | |
| us-hicks | B | 665 | unknown | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
Confederate: grade A, 3,000 (2,850–6,500)
compiled_dependencederivation_unknownwhole_engagement_leakage
| Input | Class | Printed | Basis | Bound | Codes | Passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cs-nps | A | 3,000 | reported_engaged | derivation_unknown | dossier claim reported-force-scope | |
| cs-nps-desc | bound | 3,000 | unknown | upper | engagement_link_unknownone_sided_bound | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
| cs-hicks-est | C | 6,500 | unknown | adversary_or_hearsay_estimate | dossier claim reported-force-scope | |
| cs-forrest-5000 | C | 5,000 | unknown | post_engagement_statescope_unresolved | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
Dossier claims
Draft dossier, revision forrest-west-tennessee-1864-review-correction-2026-09-25. Claims are extraction records with their quoted passages, not historical adjudication. JSON
information
supportedunresolved Hicks says his scouts brought no news of the enemy at noon and that the pickets were driven in within minutes of the alarm raised by a second scouting party; he says the enemy took position and planted a battery while the flag of truce was pending. Forrest gives the prevalence of smallpox as his reason for leaving the town.
Knowledge and reasons stated by each commander; no message log inspected.
On the 25th instant my scouts came in at about 12 m., bringing- no news of the enemy’s whereabouts.or32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1, p.547 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…in less than ten minutes after they reported the enemy were driving in my picketsor32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1, p.547 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…While the flag of truce was near the fort, and during its pend- ency, the enemy were engaged in taking position and planting a battery.or32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1, p.547 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…found the small-pox was raging and evacu- ated the place.or32-1-forrest-west-tennessee-1864-selections-v1, p.607 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
048c0f05ad96…logistics
disputedunresolved Hicks says 27,000 of the 30,000 rounds he began with were expended, so he ordered the rest shared and bayonets fixed, and that the loss in government stores was inconsiderable apart from a burned quartermaster's depot. Forrest says he captured many stores and horses and burned sixty bales of cotton, a steamer and the dry-dock, and on April 15 lists clothing, several hundred horses and medical stores; NPS says his command destroyed unwanted supplies and rounded up horses and mules.
Ammunition and stores reported by the two commanders and a summary; they differ on the extent of the stores taken, and neither is adopted. No return inspected.
out of 30,000 rounds (the amount we commenced the 548 KY., SW. VA., TENN., MISS., ALA., AND N. GA. [Chap. XLIV. fight with) 27,000 had been already expended.or32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1, pp.547–548 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…Our loss in Government stores was inconsiderable.or32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1, p.549 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…Captured many stores and horses, burned up sixty bales of cotton, one steamer and the dry-dockor32-1-forrest-west-tennessee-1864-selections-v1, p.607 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
048c0f05ad96…capturing a large amount of clothing, several hundred horses, a large lot of medical stores for the commandor32-1-forrest-west-tennessee-1864-selections-v1, p.612 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
048c0f05ad96…destroyed unwanted supplies, loaded what they wanted, and rounded up horses and mulesnps-ky010-v1, Description · snapshot
83dc0caaf86f…objectives
supportedunresolved NPS describes a multipurpose expedition to recruit, re-outfit and disperse Union forces. Forrest's demand as printed by Hicks asked surrender of the fort, troops and public property, promising treatment as prisoners of war and threatening no quarter if the works were stormed; Hicks replied that his duty was to defend the post. Forrest wrote on March 27 that fifteen unmolested days would add 2,000 men to his command.
Stated aims from the demand and reply printed by Hicks, Forrest's dispatch and a summary.
multipurpose expedition (recruit, reoutfit, disperse Yankees, etc.)nps-ky010-v1, Description · snapshot
83dc0caaf86f…I demand the sur- render of the fort and troops, with all public property. If you surrender, you shall be treated as prisoners of war ; but if I have to storm your works, you may expect no quarter.or32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1, p.547 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…I have been placed here by my Government to defend this postor32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1, p.547 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…Think if I can remain unmolested here fifteen days I will be able to add 2,000 men to my command.or32-1-forrest-west-tennessee-1864-selections-v1, p.607 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
048c0f05ad96…outcome
disputedpost_outcome The frozen and live results read Confederate victory. Hicks says three attempts to storm the fort were repulsed and the enemy withdrew for the night; Forrest says he held the town for ten hours and could have held it longer. NPS calls it a Confederate victory with no lasting results beyond the destruction of supplies and capture of animals. Forrest's March 27 dispatch dates the attack 'on the evening of the 26th', against the frozen March 25, Hicks's '25th instant' and Forrest's own surrender demand dated March 25 as printed by Hicks; the dispatch's date is kept and not reconciled.
Retain the original result and engagement interval; later movements and campaign contribution are different measures. No new probabilities or individual causal credit. The fort held while the town was occupied; the result field is kept.
attempted to storm our works, but were repulsed.or32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1, p.547 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…They made a third effort, but were forced to abandon their design.or32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1, p.547 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…the rebel general withdrew his command out of the range of my guns and went into camp for the night.or32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1, p.548 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…held the town for ten hours, and could have held it longeror32-1-forrest-west-tennessee-1864-selections-v1, p.607 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
048c0f05ad96…attacked it on the evening of the 26thor32-1-forrest-west-tennessee-1864-selections-v1, p.607 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
048c0f05ad96…Headquarters Forrest’s Cavalry Corps, Paducah, Ky ., March 25, i864.or32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1, p.547 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…other than the destruction of supplies and capture of animals, no lasting results occurrednps-ky010-v1, Description · snapshot
83dc0caaf86f…disputedpost_outcome The frozen and live casualty fields read 140 (US 90; CS 50). Hicks gives his casualties as 14 killed and 46 wounded, and the enemy's, from the most reliable information he could obtain, as 300 killed and 1,000 to 1,200 wounded, 'safely set down at 1,500'. Forrest's March 27 dispatch gives his loss at Union City and Paducah together as 25 killed and wounded as far as known and the enemy's loss in Paducah as 50 killed, wounded and prisoners, 'in all, 500'; his exchange letter printed by Hicks speaks of 35 or 40 Federal soldiers captured at Paducah, and Hicks says that all of those on Forrest's list, with one exception, were convalescents in the general hospital too feeble to get to the fort.
Original casualty returns were not inspected; preserve totals, categories, cutoffs and differences. No canonical reconciliation or casualty-based opening count; related actions must not be added without resolving population overlap. Forrest's 25 covers two actions and his 'in all, 500' appears to include Union City; neither side's figures match the frozen Confederate 50 or Union 90.
140 total (US 90; CS 50)arnold-cwsac-battles, battle KY010; column casualties_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…The casualties of my command were 14 killed and 46 wounded.or32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1, p.549 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…was 300 killed and from 1,000 to 1,200 wounded. His killed and wounded may be safely set down at 1,500.or32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1, p.549 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…My loss at Union City and Paducah, as far as known, is 25 killed and woundedor32-1-forrest-west-tennessee-1864-selections-v1, p.607 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
048c0f05ad96…Enemy’s loss in Paducah 50 killed, wounded, and prisoners : in all, 500.or32-1-forrest-west-tennessee-1864-selections-v1, p.607 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
048c0f05ad96…about 35 or 40 Federal soldiers who were captured here yesterdayor32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1, p.548 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…all of whom, with one exception, were convales- cents in the general hospital, and too feeble to get to the fort.or32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1, p.548 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…responsibility
supportedunresolved The frozen commanders are Major General Nathan Bedford Forrest, Colonel Stephen G. Hicks and Lieutenant Commander James W. Shirk (navy). Hicks declined the surrender, ordered the remaining ammunition shared and bayonets fixed, and on the 26th ordered houses burned; he names the gunboats' captains as Smith and O'Neil and does not name Shirk. Hicks says Brigadier General A. P. Thompson was killed in the third assault; NPS calls the assaulting party a small segment of Forrest's command. The inspected passages do not say who ordered the assaults.
Command roles from the post commander and a summary; Forrest's inspected dispatches do not describe the assaults. Shirk's role is not established by the inspected passages. The listed commanders do not receive automatic sole credit.
Major Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle KY010, belligerent Confederate, fullname Nathan Bedford Forrest; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Colonelarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle KY010, belligerent US, fullname Stephen G. Hicks; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Lieutenant Commanderarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle KY010, belligerent US, fullname James W. Shirk; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…I must, therefore, respectfully decline surrendering as you may require.or32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1, p.547 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…I ordered the remainder to be equally distributed ; the men to fix their bayonetsor32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1, p.548 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…It was in this last strug- gle that Brig. Gen. A. P. Thompson (Confederate) was killed.or32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1, p.547 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…A small segment of Forrest's command assaulted Fort Anderson and was repulsednps-ky010-v1, Description · snapshot
83dc0caaf86f…strength
unknownunresolved
No inspected return establishes matched personnel at a common opening boundary. Imported numerical estimates remain unchanged; this pass does not validate them as simultaneous opening forces.
disputedunresolved The frozen force field gives the Union garrison as approx. 650 men, with a side bound of 650; NPS says Forrest set out with fewer than 3,000 men and gives the garrison as 650, and the live field reads 3650 (US 650; CS 3000). Hicks lists three companies of the 122nd Illinois (120), the 16th Kentucky Cavalry (271) and the 1st Kentucky Heavy Artillery (colored, 274), 665 in all, against 6,500 under Forrest, Buford, Harris and Thompson. Forrest says he moved on Paducah with Buford's division, and on April 15 gave his whole command as four small brigades of about 5,000.
A post commander's count of his own force, his estimate of the enemy and an expedition-wide figure three weeks later; no return for the attackers. None is adopted as a matched opening strength.
Union Garrison (approx. 650 men) [US]arnold-cwsac-battles, battle KY010; column forces_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Companies C, H, and K, One hundred and twenty-second Illinois In- fantry, commanded by Maj. J. F. Chapman, 120 menor32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1, p.548 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…Sixteenth Kentucky Cavalry, Ma jor Barnes commanding, 271 menor32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1, p.548 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…First Ken- tucky Heavy Artillery (colored), 274 menor32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1, p.548 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…making a total of 665 men.or32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1, p.548 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…of 6,500 men.or32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1, p.548 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…I moved now with Buford’s division direct from Jackson to Paducah in fifty hoursor32-1-forrest-west-tennessee-1864-selections-v1, p.607 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
048c0f05ad96…My command consists of four small brigades, number- ing about 5,000 menor32-1-forrest-west-tennessee-1864-selections-v1, p.611 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
048c0f05ad96…terrain
supportedunresolved NPS says the garrison retired to Fort Anderson at the west end of town, supported by two gunboats on the Ohio. Hicks says Confederate sharpshooters used houses near the fort, which he had burned on the 26th, and that the gunboats Peosta and Paw Paw shelled the city and the enemy's flank. Forrest says he drove the enemy to their gunboats and forts.
Ground described by the post commander, the attacker and a summary; no map verification. The fort predates the attack; the phase is left unresolved because the house-burning altered the ground.
Hicks had support from two gunboats on the Ohio Rivernps-ky010-v1, Description · snapshot
83dc0caaf86f…The enemy’s sharpshooters in the mean time got possession of the houses around and near the fortor32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1, p.548 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…to send out squads to burn all the houses within musket-range of the fortor32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1, p.548 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…The gun-boats Peosta, Captain Smith, and Paw Paw, Captain O’Neil, were present and rendered valuable aid in shelling the cityor32-1-hicks-paducah-selections-v1, p.549 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
de033c6d8fc4…drove the enemy to their gun-boats and fortsor32-1-forrest-west-tennessee-1864-selections-v1, p.607 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
048c0f05ad96…Open questions
- Chapman's No. 7 report, Brayman's No. 1 and Odlin's No. 2 reports, Shirk's and the other naval reports (the Annual Report of the Secretary of the Navy), the Confederate subordinate reports, Jordan and Pryor's Chapter XV, returns and maps remain deferred.
- NPS/CWSAC is one family (the NPS battle page plus the frozen Arnold rows). Nathan B. Forrest's dispatches, letters and April 26 report (Official Records Series I, Volume XXXII, Part 1, No. 26) and his June 1864 address to his troops (Volume XXXIX, Part 1, addenda to No. 22) are one family of interested Confederate accounts; Jordan and Pryor's registered history is not independent of it and was not used here. The Official Records volumes are shared containers, not additional witnesses; report dates are not event times or proof of contemporary knowledge. Here the second family is Stephen G. Hicks's report dated April 6, 1864 (No. 6), which prints Forrest's March 25 and 26 letters and Hicks's replies; the printed date and its reference to 'the 25th instant' are not reconciled, nor is Forrest's March 27 dating of the attack to the evening of the 26th.
- No automatic commander attribution, causal campaign score, morale/readiness number or battle/campaign double counting.