Forts Jackson and St. Philip LA001
1862-04-16 to 1862-04-28 · LA · Expedition to, and Capture of, New Orleans [April-May 1862] · frozen result: Union · NPS summary (as listed)
Early Union plans had called for the division of the Confederacy by seizing control of the Mississippi River. One of the first steps in such operations was to enter the mouth of the Mississippi River, ascend to New Orleans and capture the city, closing off the entrance to Rebel ships. In mid-January 1862, Flag-Officer David G. Farragut undertook this enterprise with his West Gulf Blockading Squadron. The way was soon open except for the two forts, Jackson and St. Philip, above the Head of the Passes, approximately seventy miles below New Orleans. In addition to the forts and their armament, the Confederates had placed obstructions in the river and there were a number of ships, including two ironclads, to assist in the defense. Farragut based his operations from Ship Island, Mississippi, and on April 8, he assembled 24 of his vessels and Comdr. David D. Porter's 19 mortar schooners near the Head of the Passes. Starting on the 16th and continuing for seven days, the mortar schooners bombarded Fort Jackson but failed to silence its guns. Some of Farragut's gunboats opened a way through the obstruction on the night of the 22nd. Early on the morning of the 24th, Farragut sent his ships north to pass the forts and head for New Orleans. Although the Rebels attempted to stop the Union ships in various ways, most of the force successfully passed the forts and continued on to New Orleans where Farragut accepted the city's surrender. With the passage of the forts, nothing could stop the Union forces: the fall of New Orleans was inevitable and anti-climatic. Cut off and surrounded, the garrisons of the two forts surrendered on the 28th.
Command responsibility (ledger v2)
US: David G. Farragut
Grade A under rule 2; echelon flotilla.
A cited passage states the command. The side's first combat was the mortar bombardment from April 16 by Porter's flotilla, which Mahan puts 'under the command of Commander ... David D. Porter' within Farragut's assembled force; Porter led part of the force (rule 2, second bullet); Mahan has the flotilla's steam vessels 'at once ordered by the flag-officer to Southwest Pass'. Butler's army is not listed and did not fight within the interval in the inspected passages.
Flag Officerarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle LA001, belligerent US, fullname David G. Farragut; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Flag-Officer David G. Farragut undertook this enterprise with his West Gulf Blockading Squadron.arnold-cwsac-battles, battle LA001; column description · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Early on the morning of the 24th, Farragut sent his ships north to pass the fortsarnold-cwsac-battles, battle LA001; column description · snapshot
952b5d08402a…the whole under the command of Commander (afterward Admiral) David D. Porter,mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2 · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…he changed his plan and directed that the starboard column should advance first,mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2 · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…The steam vessels of the flotilla were at once ordered by the flag-officer to Southwest Passmahan-new-orleans-selections-v2 · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…Confederate: Johnson K. Duncan
Grade C under rule 5; echelon detachment_or_post. joint_command
Other candidates: John K. Mitchell
Army (Duncan) and navy (Mitchell) listings. No inspected passage shows one officer over both: Duncan says that by the department commander's direction 'everything afloat' was turned over to Mitchell on April 22, and Mahan says the River Defence Fleet refused Mitchell's orders. The recorded result is the forts' surrender, and Mahan gives Duncan 'general charge of all the works of the exterior line' (Higgins commanded both forts under him) (rule 5, second case). Lovell, the department commander, placed the vessels under Mitchell and came down on the night of April 23 (LA002 dossier); that is departmental direction and is not labelled here.
Brigadier Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle LA001, belligerent Confederate, fullname Johnson K. Duncan; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Commanderarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle LA001, belligerent Confederate, fullname John K. Mitchell; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…General Duncan had general charge of all the works of the exterior line,mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2 · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…Colonel Higgins was in command of both the forts,mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2 · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…By the direction of the major-general commanding the de- partment everything afloat, including the tow-boats and the entire con- trol of the fire barges, was turned over to Capt. John K. Mitchell,or6-duncan-forts-selections-v1 · snapshot
79977b1c1c4b…who entirely refused to obey the orders of Commander Mitchell,mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2 · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…Cut off and surrounded, the garrisons of the two forts surrendered on the 28th.arnold-cwsac-battles, battle LA001; column description · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Side strength (ledger v3)
US: grade D: no usable figure (modelled in the rating runs)
whole_engagement_leakage
Confederate: grade B, 1,100 (940–1,270)
derivation_unknownsingle_inputwhole_engagement_leakage
| Input | Class | Printed | Basis | Bound | Codes | Passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cs-mullen-125 | bound | 125 | unknown | lower | partial_scope | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
| cs-chalmette-500 | bound | 500 | unknown | lower | partial_scope | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
| cs-lent-150 | bound | 150 | unknown | lower | partial_scope | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
| cs-clodfelter | B | 1,100 | unknown | derivation_unknown | 1100arnold-clodfelter-forces, battle_id New Orleans, belligerent Confederate; column strength · snapshot 96430f3626d3… |
Dossier claims
Draft dossier, revision new-orleans-1862-review-correction-2026-09-25. Claims are extraction records with their quoted passages, not historical adjudication. JSON
information
disputedunresolved Duncan says that no fire barge was sent down on the night of April 23, that the river remained in complete darkness, and that the gunners could aim only at the flashes of the enemy's guns; he judges that the dash was not part of the enemy's original design. Mahan says Caldwell's boat sounded the breach on the night of the 23d and signalled that nothing barred the passage, and that orders to attack were issued that day.
Attributed knowledge from an interested report and a history. Whether the passage was planned or improvised is disputed; no fleet orders or signal logs were inspected.
To my utter surprise not one siugle fire barge was sent down the river,or6-duncan-forts-selections-v1, p.527 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79977b1c1c4b…In consequence of this criminal neglect the river remained in complete darkness throughout the entire night.or6-duncan-forts-selections-v1, p.528 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79977b1c1c4b…the gunners were obliged to goA^ern their firing entirely by the flashes of the enemy’s guns.or6-duncan-forts-selections-v1, p.528 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79977b1c1c4b…I am satisfied that he was suddenly inspired for the first time to run the gauntlet at all hazards, although not a part of his original design.or6-duncan-forts-selections-v1, p.528 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79977b1c1c4b…showing conclusively that, to a depth of sixty feet, nothing existed to bar the passage of the fleet.mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, p.73 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…the orders to be ready to attack the following night were issued.mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, p.71 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…logistics
supportedunresolved Duncan says requisitions for heavy guns had been ignored, that the garrison lost most of its clothing and blankets in the fire, and that the forts' shot fell short partly from inferior powder. Mahan says the Confederacy was badly off for cannon and that the Louisiana left the city with workmen still on board. The selected passages give no supply statement for the Union squadron.
Supply statements from an interested report and a history; not returns.
No attention having been previously paid to the repeated requisitions for guns of heavy caliber for these forts,or6-duncan-forts-selections-v1, p.521 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79977b1c1c4b…The most of their clothing and blankets, besides, were lost by the fire hereinafter mentioned.or6-duncan-forts-selections-v1, p.521 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79977b1c1c4b…Generally our shots fell short for lack of elevation and in consequence of the inferiority of our powder compared to that of the enemy.or6-duncan-forts-selections-v1, p.525 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79977b1c1c4b…The truth is that the Confederacy was very badly off for cannon,mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, p.59 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…she was shoved off from the city on Sunday afternoon, four days before the fight, with workmen still on board.mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, p.62 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…objectives
supportedunresolved NPS gives the Union aim as entering the river and ascending to capture New Orleans; Mahan says mortar fire would not reduce the forts and it was necessary to pass above. Duncan wanted the Louisiana used as a battery below the raft to dislodge the mortar boats; Mahan says Mitchell declined.
Stated aims from a summary, a history and an interested report.
to enter the mouth of the Mississippi River, ascend to New Orleans and capture the city,nps-la001-v1, Description · snapshot
2ae296af7504…Mortar-firing, however good, would not reduce the forts, nor lay New Orleans at the mercy of the fleet. It was necessary to pass above.mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, p.64 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…Under these circumstances I considered that the Louisiana could only be regarded as a battery, and that her best possi- ble i)osition would be below the raft,or6-duncan-forts-selections-v1, p.526 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79977b1c1c4b…Mitchell declined for several reasons.mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, p.69 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…outcome
supportedpost_outcome The frozen result reads Union victory and the live result Union Victory. NPS says the garrisons surrendered on the 28th, cut off and surrounded. Duncan and Mahan say the Fort Jackson garrison mutinied at midnight on the 27th and that Duncan then accepted Porter's terms; Mahan says three gunboats of the rear column failed to get by.
Retain the original result and engagement interval; later movements and campaign contribution are different measures. No new probabilities or individual causal credit. The fleet's passage on April 24 and the surrender on April 28 are different phases of this record.
Cut off and surrounded, the garrisons of the two forts surrendered on the 28th.nps-la001-v1, Description · snapshot
2ae296af7504…the garrison of Fort J ackson revolted in mass ;or6-duncan-forts-selections-v1, p.531 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79977b1c1c4b…At midnight of the 27th, the troops rose,mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, p.87 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…To avoid a humiliating disaster, General Duncan accepted the offered terms on the 28th.mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, p.88 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…The three gunboats at the rear of the second column failed to get by.mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, p.79 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…disputedpost_outcome The frozen casualty text reads 1,011 total (US 229; CS 782), and the live field agrees. Mahan gives the garrison's loss as 14 killed and 39 wounded, and ship losses of 8 killed and 24 wounded on the Iroquois and 3 killed and 8 wounded on the Pinola. Duncan says he had no means of ascertaining the enemy's damage and that the Louisiana's explosion killed one man at Fort St. Philip; about one-half of the Fort Jackson garrison left after the mutiny.
Original casualty returns were not inspected; preserve totals, categories, cutoffs and differences. No canonical reconciliation or casualty-based opening count; related actions must not be added without resolving population overlap. The frozen Confederate total's basis (killed, wounded, captured or paroled) is not stated in the inspected passages. Mahan's 14 killed and 39 wounded follows his paragraph on the state of Fort Jackson when taken possession of; whether it covers Fort St. Philip is not stated.
1,011 total (US 229; CS 782)arnold-cwsac-battles, battle LA001; column casualties_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…When taken possession of, Fort Jackson was found to have suffered greatly.mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, p.89 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…The loss of the garrison had been 14 killed and 39 wounded.mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, p.89 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…made the loss of the Iroquois amount to 8 killed and 24 wounded,mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, p.79 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…She was struck fourteen times, and lost three killed and [79] eight wounded,mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, pp.78–79 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…The extent of the damage which was done to the enemy we had no means of ascertaining.or6-duncan-forts-selections-v1, p.529 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79977b1c1c4b…killing 1 of our men and wounding 3 or 4 others.or6-duncan-forts-selections-v1, p.533 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79977b1c1c4b…About one-half of the garrison left immediately,or6-duncan-forts-selections-v1, p.531 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79977b1c1c4b…responsibility
supportedunresolved Mahan says Duncan had general charge of the exterior works, Higgins commanded both forts and Porter the mortar flotilla, and that the River Defence Fleet's captain refused Mitchell's orders; Duncan says everything afloat was turned over to Mitchell on April 22 by the department commander's direction. Mahan says Farragut changed his plan from two columns abreast to a single line. The frozen commanders are Brigadier General Johnson K. Duncan, Commander John K. Mitchell and Flag Officer David G. Farragut; the live page gives Farragut as Admiral and does not list Mitchell.
Command roles from a history and an interested report; divided army and navy control is described by both. The listed commanders do not receive automatic sole credit, and the live rank is not adopted.
General Duncan had general charge of all the works of the exterior line,mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, p.60 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…Colonel Higgins was in command of both the forts,mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, p.60 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…the whole under the command of Commander (afterward Admiral) David D. Porter,mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, p.53 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…who entirely refused to obey the orders of Commander Mitchell,mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, p.61 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…By the direction of the major-general commanding the de- partment everything afloat, including the tow-boats and the entire con- trol of the fire barges, was turned over to Capt. John K. Mitchell,or6-duncan-forts-selections-v1, p.526 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79977b1c1c4b…he changed his plan and directed that the starboard column should advance first,mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, p.72 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…Brigadier Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle LA001, belligerent Confederate, fullname Johnson K. Duncan; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Commanderarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle LA001, belligerent Confederate, fullname John K. Mitchell; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Flag Officerarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle LA001, belligerent US, fullname David G. Farragut; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…strength
unknownunresolved
No inspected return establishes matched personnel at a common opening boundary. The frozen side-specific numerical strength bounds are blank (missing_numeric_strength). No figure in this pass is adopted as a simultaneous opening force.
disputedunresolved The frozen force field reads West Gulf Blockading Squadron [US] and the garrisons of the two forts and the crews of various ships [CS]; the live force field reads zero. NPS says Farragut assembled 24 of his vessels and Porter's 19 mortar schooners. Mahan lists seventeen vessels in the squadron carrying 154 guns, besides twenty mortar-schooners with six gunboats, and counts 109 guns in the two works, including sixty-two in Fort Jackson proper and forty-two at Fort St. Philip commanding the river, with four Confederate navy vessels, two State vessels and six of the River Defence Fleet. Duncan says thirteen of twenty-three enemy vessels got by and that the mortar fleet had twenty-one schooners; he gives about 125 sharpshooters, the Chalmette Regiment of about 500 men at the quarantine, and 150 men lent from the forts to the Louisiana. No inspected passage gives the garrison's numbers.
Vessel, gun and detachment counts with different scopes and dates; the vessel and mortar-schooner counts disagree. None is adopted as a matched opening strength. The live zero is not measured absence.
West Gulf Blockading Squadron [US]; Garrisons of Forts Jackson and St. Philip and the crews of various ships [CS]arnold-cwsac-battles, battle LA001; column forces_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…he assembled 24 of his vessels and Comdr. David D. Porter's 19 mortar schooners near the Head of the Passes.nps-la001-v1, Description · snapshot
2ae296af7504…A fleet of twenty mortar-schooners, with an accompanying flotilla of six gunboats,mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, p.53 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…in all seventeen vessels, of all classes, carrying, exclusive of brass howitzers, one hundred and fifty-four guns.mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, p.54 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…There were here, then, forty-two guns commanding the river below the bend,mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, p.58 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…total in the fort, sixty-two.mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, p.59 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…Of 109 in the two works, 56 were 24-pounders.mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, p.59 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…Auxiliary to the forts there were four vessels of the Confederate Navy, two belonging to the State of Louisiana, and [61] six of the River Defence Fleet.mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, pp.60–61 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…Thirteen of the enemy’s vessels out of twenty-three succeeded in get- ting by,or6-duncan-forts-selections-v1, p.529 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79977b1c1c4b…the mor- tar flotilla, composed of twenty-one schooners,or6-duncan-forts-selections-v1, p.524 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79977b1c1c4b…Cax)tain Mullen’s comx)any, of about 125 men,or6-duncan-forts-selections-v1, p.522 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79977b1c1c4b…The Chalmette Regiment, consisting of about 500 men.or6-duncan-forts-selections-v1, p.522 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79977b1c1c4b…I also gave Captain Mitchell 150 of our best men from Forts Jackson and Saint Philip,or6-duncan-forts-selections-v1, p.526 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79977b1c1c4b…terrain
disputedunresolved Mahan places the two permanent works at Plaquemine Bend, Fort St. Philip on the left bank and Fort Jackson on the right, with the woods below Jackson cleared nearly to the extreme range of its guns, and describes the obstruction of seven or eight schooners chained across the river after the raft broke in a four-knot current. Duncan says high water had submerged the parade plain and casemates of Fort Jackson three to eighteen inches deep. Mahan places the bend twenty miles from the Head of the Passes and ninety below New Orleans; NPS places the forts approximately seventy miles below New Orleans.
Ground, works and water described by a history and an interested report; no map verification. The works and the flood predate the bombardment, but the obstruction was placed and repaired by the defenders, so the phase is left unresolved. The distances below New Orleans differ (Mahan ninety miles, NPS approximately seventy) and are not reconciled.
twenty miles from the Head of the Passes, and ninety below New Orleans.mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, p.58 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…Two permanent fortifications existed at this point, one on the left, or north bank of the stream, called Fort St. Philip, the other on the right bank, called Fort Jackson.mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, p.58 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…the woods on the west bank had been cleared away below Jackson almost to the extreme range of its guns,mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, p.58 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…the current, then running four knots an hour,mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, p.65 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…Seven or eight heavily built schooners, of about two hundred tons, were then seized and placed in a line across the river in the position of the raft.mahan-new-orleans-selections-v2, p.65 (digital page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
e21f65cdd302…the iiarade plain and casemates were very generally submerged to a depth of from 3 to 18 inches.or6-duncan-forts-selections-v1, p.521 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79977b1c1c4b…Open questions
- Farragut's and Porter's reports (Official Records of the Navies, Series I, Volume 18), Higgins's and Squires's reports (Nos. 5-6), Duncan's attached documents A-W and the surgeons' returns, Mitchell's report and the Confederate Court of Inquiry (No. 8) remain deferred.
- NPS/CWSAC is one family. A. T. Mahan's The Gulf and Inland Waters (Scribner's, copyright 1883; the Project Gutenberg text of the 1898 London issue) is an interested Union naval history already registered for the Mississippi pass; it relies chiefly on the official reports and cites the Confederate officers' testimony, so it is not independent of them. Duncan's April 30, 1862 report is one interested Confederate family. Official Records Series I, Volume VI is a shared container, not an additional witness. Report dates are not event times or proof of contemporary knowledge.
- No automatic commander attribution, causal campaign score, morale/readiness number or battle/campaign double counting.