Georgia Landing LA005
1862-10-27 to 1862-10-27 · LA · Operations in LaFourche District [October 1862] · frozen result: Union · NPS summary (as listed)
Maj. Gen. Benjamin F. Butler, commanding Union forces in the Department of the Gulf, launched an expedition into the Bayou Lafourche region to eliminate the Rebel threat from that area, to make sure that sugar and cotton products from there would come into Union hands and, in the future, to use it as a base for other military operations. He organized a brigade of about 4,000 men under the command of his protege Brig. Gen. Godfrey Weitzel to accomplish the missions. On October 25, Weitzel and his men arrived at Donaldsonville, where the Lafourche meets the Mississippi, and began an advance up the east bank of the bayou. The Confederates under the command of Brig. Gen. Alfred Mouton attempted to concentrate to meet the threat. By the 27th, the Confederates had occupied a position on the bayou above Labadieville. A little more than half the force was on the east bank while the rest of the men were on the west bank near Georgia Landing, generally without means of concentrating on one side or the other. As the Federal troops continued down the east bank, they encountered the Rebels at about 11:00 am and began skirmishing. The Confederates fell back quickly. Weitzel then began crossing his men to the west bank to attack the Rebel troops there. For some time, these Confederate troops fought resolutely and brought the Union assault to a standstill. The Rebels, however, ran out of artillery ammunition and had to withdraw to Labadieville, opening up this portion of the Lafourche to the Union.
Command responsibility (ledger v2)
US: Godfrey Weitzel
Grade A under rule 2; echelon brigade. superior_directing
A cited passage states the command. Butler, commanding the department, launched the expedition and committed its preparation to Weitzel (superior_directing: Butler).
Brigadier Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle LA005, belligerent US, fullname Godfrey Weitzel; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…He organized a brigade of about 4,000 men under the command of his protege Brig. Gen. Godfrey Weitzelarnold-cwsac-battles, battle LA005; column description · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Weitzel then began crossing his men to the west bank to attack the Rebel troops there.arnold-cwsac-battles, battle LA005; column description · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Confederate: Alfred Mouton
Grade A under rule 2; echelon unknown.
A cited passage states the command: Mouton disposed the forces on both banks. Armant 'commanded the troops' on the right bank, a subordinate leading part of the force (rule 2, second bullet). The description times the first skirmish at about 11 a.m. on the east bank; Mouton has the right-bank column engage at about 9 a.m. Either way Mouton commanded. Taylor, whose presence Mouton urged, was not on the field. Echelon not stated.
Brigadier Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle LA005, belligerent Confederate, fullname Alfred Mouton; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…The Confederates under the command of Brig. Gen. Alfred Mouton attempted to concentrate to meet the threat.arnold-cwsac-battles, battle LA005; column description · snapshot
952b5d08402a…The Eighteenth and Crescent, supported by Ralston’s battery, were placed on the right descending bankor15-mouton-la-fourche-selections-v1 · snapshot
dc7a9c392926…Colonel Armant, of the Eighteenth Regiment, commanded the troops and disposed of them with ability and judgment,or15-mouton-la-fourche-selections-v1 · snapshot
dc7a9c392926…Side strength (ledger v3)
US: grade A, 4,000 (3,800–4,200)
compiled_dependencederivation_unknownwhole_engagement_leakage
| Input | Class | Printed | Basis | Bound | Codes | Passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| us-nps | A | 4,000 | reported_engaged | derivation_unknown | dossier claim reported-force-scope | |
| us-nps-desc | B | 4,000 | unknown | derivation_unknown | dossier claim reported-force-scope | |
| us-mouton-vincent | bound | 2,500–3,000 | unknown | lower | adversary_or_hearsay_estimatepartial_scope | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
| us-mouton-each | bound | 1,500–1,800 | unknown | lower | adversary_or_hearsay_estimatepartial_scope | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
| us-mouton-close | bound | 2,000 | unknown | lower | adversary_or_hearsay_estimatepartial_intervalpartial_scope | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
Confederate: grade A, 1,390 (1,320–1,460)
compiled_dependencederivation_unknownwhole_engagement_leakage
| Input | Class | Printed | Basis | Bound | Codes | Passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cs-cw | A | 1,392 | reported_engaged | derivation_unknown | 1,392arnold-cwsac-forces, battle LA005, belligerent Confederate; column description · snapshot a462f6be964b… | |
| cs-nps | A | 1,392 | reported_engaged | derivation_unknown | dossier claim reported-force-scope | |
| cs-mouton-1392 | B | 1,392 | unknown | dossier claim reported-force-scope | ||
| cs-mouton-594 | bound | 594 | unknown | lower | partial_scope | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
| cs-mouton-1000 | bound | 1,000 | unknown | lower | partial_interval | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
Dossier claims
Draft dossier, revision lafourche-1862-review-correction-2026-09-25. Claims are extraction records with their quoted passages, not historical adjudication. JSON
information
supportedunresolved Mouton says he learned late on October 25 that gunboats and transports were moving up the river, and was informed that the enemy would move simultaneously by Donaldsonville, Des Allemands and Berwick Bay; Irwin says the country offered few points from which positions and numbers could be made out.
Attributed knowledge from an interested report and a history; no scouting reports inspected.
Late on the 25th of October, 1862, I received information that the gunboats and transports of the enemy were moving up the river slowly and cautiously,or15-mouton-la-fourche-selections-v1, p.176 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
dc7a9c392926…Informed that the enemy would make simultaneous movements via Donaldsonville, Des Allemands, and Ber- wick Bay,or15-mouton-la-fourche-selections-v1, p.177 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
dc7a9c392926…there are few points from which their position and numbers can be easily made out.irwin-lafourche-1862-selections-v1, p.47 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d6defb567211…logistics
supportedunresolved NPS says the Confederates ran out of artillery ammunition; Mouton says Ralston's battery was badly injured and its ammunition gave out, and that an engineer's refusal to run the train without written orders delayed the concentration of Vick's command. Irwin says the operation needed light gunboats, which Butler had built with army funds.
Supply statements from a summary, an interested report and a history; not returns.
The Rebels, however, ran out of artillery ammunitionnps-la005-v1, Description · snapshot
b49254a13b95…Ralston’s battery was so severely injured by the enemy’s, and their ammunition giving out,or15-mouton-la-fourche-selections-v1, p.177 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
dc7a9c392926…refused to go unless by orders in writingor15-mouton-la-fourche-selections-v1, p.177 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
dc7a9c392926…Without naval assistance, the operation would have been difficult, if not impossible ;irwin-lafourche-1862-selections-v1, p.46 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d6defb567211…With the funds of the army Butler caused four light gunboats,irwin-lafourche-1862-selections-v1, p.46 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d6defb567211…objectives
supportedunresolved NPS gives Butler's aims as eliminating the Confederate threat, securing sugar and cotton and gaining a base; Irwin says Butler committed to Weitzel the dislodging of Taylor and occupation of La Fourche. Mouton says his object, had he united his force, was a desperate resistance, but when reinforcements failed he could only maneuver and save his force.
Stated aims from a summary, a history and an interested report.
to eliminate the Rebel threat from that area, to make sure that sugar and cotton products from there would come into Union handsnps-la005-v1, Description · snapshot
b49254a13b95…Butler at once committed to Weitzel the preparations for dislodging Taylor and occupying La Fourche.irwin-lafourche-1862-selections-v1, p.46 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d6defb567211…My object, could I have united my force, was to make a desperate resistance and to drive the enemy back if possible,or15-mouton-la-fourche-selections-v1, p.177 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
dc7a9c392926…no alternative was left to me but to maneuver with the enemy and save my force.or15-mouton-la-fourche-selections-v1, p.177 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
dc7a9c392926…outcome
supportedpost_outcome The frozen result reads Union victory and the live result Union Victory. Irwin says Mouton's force was compelled to retreat after a short engagement. Mouton says that when Ralston's battery was badly injured and out of ammunition "they" fell back in some confusion owing to the loss of their commander; he reports Ralston, commanding the battery, wounded and captured, and says Armant, who commanded the troops, fell back in perfect order. NPS says the withdrawal opened this portion of the Lafourche.
Retain the original result and engagement interval; later movements and campaign contribution are different measures. No new probabilities or individual causal credit. The evacuation of the district is campaign context. Mouton's report does not make clear whether the confused withdrawal was the battery's or the right-bank infantry's; the two statements are kept as written.
After a short but spirited engagement Mouton's force was compelled to retreat.irwin-lafourche-1862-selections-v1, p.47 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d6defb567211…Ralston’s battery was so severely injured by the enemy’s, and their ammunition giving out,or15-mouton-la-fourche-selections-v1, p.177 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
dc7a9c392926…which was done in some confusion, owing to the loss of their commander.or15-mouton-la-fourche-selections-v1, p.177 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
dc7a9c392926…commanding the battery, was wounded and captured.or15-mouton-la-fourche-selections-v1, p.178 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
dc7a9c392926…falling back in perfect orderor15-mouton-la-fourche-selections-v1, p.178 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
dc7a9c392926…opening up this portion of the Lafourche to the Union.nps-la005-v1, Description · snapshot
b49254a13b95…disputedpost_outcome The frozen casualty text reads 315 total (US 86; CS 229), and the live field agrees. Mouton reports 5 killed, 8 wounded and 186 missing and estimates the enemy's loss at 250 to 300 on a paroled officer's information. Irwin repeats Mouton's 199 and says Weitzel claimed 208 prisoners and gave his own loss as 18 killed and 74 wounded, with 5 missing in the nominal lists, 97 in all.
Original casualty returns were not inspected; preserve totals, categories, cutoffs and differences. No canonical reconciliation or casualty-based opening count; related actions must not be added without resolving population overlap.
315 total (US 86; CS 229)arnold-cwsac-battles, battle LA005; column casualties_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Killed, 5; wounded, 8; missing, 186or15-mouton-la-fourche-selections-v1, p.178 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
dc7a9c392926…The enemy’s loss reaches fully 250 to 300,or15-mouton-la-fourche-selections-v1, p.178 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
dc7a9c392926…Mouton's re- port accounts for 5 killed, 8 wounded, and 1S6 missing; in all 199.irwin-lafourche-1862-selections-v1, p.47 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d6defb567211…He claims to have taken 208 prisoners and one gun, and states his own losses as 18 killed, and 74 wounded,irwin-lafourche-1862-selections-v1, p.47 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d6defb567211…thus bringing the total casualties to 97.irwin-lafourche-1862-selections-v1, p.48 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d6defb567211…responsibility
supportedunresolved Mouton says Colonel Armant of the 18th commanded the troops on the right bank and disposed them with ability; Irwin says Weitzel pursued for about four miles. The frozen commanders are Brigadier Generals Alfred Mouton and Godfrey Weitzel, as on the live page.
Command roles from an interested report and a history; the listed commanders do not receive automatic sole credit.
Colonel Armant, of the Eighteenth Regiment, commanded the troops and disposed of them with ability and judgment,or15-mouton-la-fourche-selections-v1, p.178 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
dc7a9c392926…Weitzel pursued for about four miles.irwin-lafourche-1862-selections-v1, p.47 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d6defb567211…Brigadier Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle LA005, belligerent Confederate, fullname Alfred Mouton; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Brigadier Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle LA005, belligerent US, fullname Godfrey Weitzel; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…strength
unknownunresolved
No inspected return establishes matched personnel at a common opening boundary. Imported numerical estimates remain unchanged; this pass does not validate them as simultaneous opening forces.
disputedunresolved The frozen force field lists eight Confederate units (approx. 1,392 men) against the Reserve brigade, Department of the Gulf, and the frozen Confederate bound is 1,392; the live field reads 5392 total (US 4000; CS 1392) and NPS says Butler organized a brigade of about 4,000 men. Mouton's return-based table totals 1,392 for both banks, with 594 in the 33d Regiment and 150 in the 2d Louisiana Cavalry. Mouton gives Vincent's information of 2,500 to 3,000 enemy infantry, 250 cavalry and two batteries, an enemy of 1,500 to 1,800 on each bank, and at the close of the day about 2,000 infantry, 100 cavalry and a battery against his own barely 1,000. Irwin says Mouton reported 1,392 and names the outlying La Fourche regiment of 500 and 300 men of the 33d.
Mouton's 1,392 is a return figure for troops on both banks before the fight; the Union figures are NPS's organization figure and Mouton's estimates for different moments. Irwin repeats Mouton's figure and is not an independent check. None is adopted as a matched opening strength.
18th Louisiana Infantry Regiment, Crescent Regiment, Ralston's Battery, Detachment of Cavalry, 33rd Louisiana Infantry Regiment, Terre Bonne Regiment Louisiana Militia, Semmes's Battery and 2nd Louisiana Cavalry Regiment (approx. 1,392 men) [CS]arnold-cwsac-battles, battle LA005; column forces_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Thus to oppose the enemy on the right bank I had, according to returns made, viz :or15-mouton-la-fourche-selections-v1, p.176 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
dc7a9c392926…Thirty-third Regiment* 594or15-mouton-la-fourche-selections-v1, p.176 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
dc7a9c392926…Second Louisiana Cavalry 150 ■ OOO 1,392or15-mouton-la-fourche-selections-v1, p.176 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
dc7a9c392926…the enemy numbered from 2,500 to 3,000 infantry, 250 cavalry, and two batteries of field artillery.or15-mouton-la-fourche-selections-v1, p.176 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
dc7a9c392926…his force being from 1,500 to 1,800 on each side.or15-mouton-la-fourche-selections-v1, p.177 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
dc7a9c392926…the force of the enemy numbered about 2,000 infantry, 100 cavalry, and a battery, while my own barely reached 1,000,or15-mouton-la-fourche-selections-v1, p.177 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
dc7a9c392926…in all reported by Mouton asirwin-lafourche-1862-selections-v1, p.46 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d6defb567211…including the La Fourche regiment, 500 strong, 300 men of the 33d Louisiana,irwin-lafourche-1862-selections-v1, p.47 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d6defb567211…terrain
supportedunresolved Mouton says the enemy advanced on both banks in about equal force, so he held positions on both sides of the bayou; NPS says his force was divided, generally without means of concentrating. Irwin describes narrow standing room along the bayous and low, heavily wooded ground crossed by deep ditches, where positions and numbers were hard to make out. Mouton says the enemy crossed troops by pontoon bridge to the right bank.
Ground described by an interested report, a history and a summary; no map verification. The division across the bayou was Mouton's response to the advance, so the phase is left unresolved.
to prevent being outflanked, it became necessary to hold positions on both sides of the bayou.or15-mouton-la-fourche-selections-v1, p.176 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
dc7a9c392926…generally without means of concentrating on one side or the other.nps-la005-v1, Description · snapshot
b49254a13b95…Along these bayous the standing room is for the most part nar- row ;irwin-lafourche-1862-selections-v1, p.47 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d6defb567211…crossed by many ditches of con- siderable depth,irwin-lafourche-1862-selections-v1, p.47 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
d6defb567211…the enemy was crossing troops on pontoon bridge to the right bankor15-mouton-la-fourche-selections-v1, p.177 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
dc7a9c392926…Open questions
- Butler's No. 1 and Weitzel's No. 2 reports, Taylor's No. 4 transmittal (read, not selected), the Union nominal casualty lists and the naval reports remain deferred.
- NPS/CWSAC is one family. Richard B. Irwin's History of the Nineteenth Army Corps (Putnam's, 1892), already registered for the Red River pass, is an interested Union history by Irwin, styled on the OCR title page assistant adjutant-general of the corps and of the Department of the Gulf. Its Georgia Landing passage gives Mouton's figures from his report, so it is not independent of it. Mouton's November 4, 1862 report (Official Records Series I, Volume XV, a shared container) is one interested Confederate family. Report dates are not event times or proof of contemporary knowledge.
- No automatic commander attribution, causal campaign score, morale/readiness number or battle/campaign double counting.