Goodrich's Landing LA014
1863-06-29 to 1863-06-30 · LA · Grant's Operations Against Vicksburg [March-July 1863] · frozen result: Inconclusive · NPS summary (as listed)
After Union forces began occupying the Louisiana river parishes, thousands of escaped slaves flocked to them. The Federals, therefore, leased some plantations and put the freedmen to work growing cotton or other crops; the proceeds from the sale of the crops helped defray expenses for food, clothing, etc. African-American troops were assigned to protect these plantations, releasing other troops to fight. Confederates, determined to recapture some of these freedmen and destroy the crops, undertook an expedition from Gaines's Landing, Arkansas, to Lake Providence. The Federals had constructed a fort on an Indian mound to protect some of these leased plantations. The Rebels prepared to attack the fort on the 29th but decided to demand unconditional surrender first, which the Union forces accepted. Later in the day, Confederate Col. W.H. Parsons fought companies of the 1st Kansas Mounted Infantry. The Rebels then began burning and destroying the surrounding plantations, especially those that the Yankees leased. By the next morning, U.S. Naval boats had landed the Mississippi Marine Brigade, under the command of Brig. Gen. Alfred W. Ellet, at Goodrich's Landing. At dawn, he set out with Col. William F. Wood's African-American units to find the Rebels. Ellet's cavalry found the Confederates first and began skirmishing. The fight became more intense as Ellet's other forces approached. Parsons eventually disengaged and fell back. Although the Confederates disrupted these operations, destroyed much property, and captured many supplies and weapons, the raid was a minor setback for the Union. The Confederates could cause momentary disturbances, but they were unable to effect any lasting changes.
Dossier claims
Draft dossier, revision vicksburg-1863-review-correction-2026-09-25. Claims are extraction records with their quoted passages, not historical adjudication. JSON
information
supportedunresolved Reid says he learned through Black residents that fighting was going on at the Mounds and sent the First Kansas Mounted to meet the raiders, who proved too strong for it.
Attributed knowledge in one report; no inspected message log.
Hearing through negroes that a fight was going on at the Mounds,or24-2-reid-selections-v2, p.450 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
f8d0cd13d828…but found them too strong, and had to fall back,or24-2-reid-selections-v2, p.450 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
f8d0cd13d828…logistics
supportedunresolved Reid says his post had a strong earth-and-cotton fortification but no artillery until a section had just arrived, and that a Marine Brigade boat's fire frightened the raiders off. NPS says naval boats landed the Marine Brigade at Goodrich's Landing by the next morning.
Supply and naval-support statements from one report and a summary; no inspected return.
if we had any artillery could make a defense against a large force.or24-2-reid-selections-v2, p.450 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
f8d0cd13d828…We have just received a section of artillery,or24-2-reid-selections-v2, p.450 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
f8d0cd13d828…fired one of its pop guns at the rebels, which frightened them off at onceor24-2-reid-selections-v2, p.450 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
f8d0cd13d828…U.S. Naval boats had landed the Mississippi Marine Brigade, under the command of Brig. Gen. Alfred W. Ellet, at Goodrich's Landing.nps-la014-v1, Description · snapshot
442b80431d0e…objectives
supportedunresolved NPS says the Confederates meant to recapture freedpeople and destroy the crops on federally leased plantations. Walker says his forces broke up those plantations from Milliken's Bend to Lake Providence, capturing some 2,000 Black people who, he says, were returned to enslavement ('restored to their masters'), except those captured in arms and a few he describes as the property of disloyal citizens, and that he had planned to push on toward Providence and Ashton.
Stated aims from a summary and the Confederate division commander's report; his words are quoted as evidence of the raid's purpose and effect.
Confederates, determined to recapture some of these freedmen and destroy the crops,nps-la014-v1, Description · snapshot
442b80431d0e…have broken up the plantations engaged in raising cotton under Federal leases from Milliken’s Bend to Lake Providence,or24-2-walker-selections-v2, p.466 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
b32764f92373…capturing some 2,000 negroes, who have been restored to their masters,or24-2-walker-selections-v2, p.466 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
b32764f92373…with the excep- tion of those captured in arms, and a few the property of disloyal citi- zens of Louisiana.or24-2-walker-selections-v2, p.466 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
b32764f92373…I had made all my arrangements to push the next day toward Providence and Ashton,or24-2-walker-selections-v2, p.466 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
b32764f92373…outcome
disputedpost_outcome NPS places the surrender of the mound fort on the 29th; Reid says the raiders attacked at the Mounds on the 29th, capturing two companies; Walker dates the capitulation to the 30th.
The dates conflict; both lie inside the frozen June 29–30 interval and neither is adopted.
The Rebels prepared to attack the fort on the 29th but decided to demand unconditional surrender first,nps-la014-v1, Description · snapshot
442b80431d0e…On the 29th ultimo, the rebels from the other side of Bayou Macon came in near the Wilton plantation, at the Mounds,or24-2-reid-selections-v2, p.450 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
f8d0cd13d828…This was on the 30th ultimo,or24-2-walker-selections-v2, p.466 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
b32764f92373…supportedpost_outcome The frozen result reads Inconclusive and the live result Indecisive. NPS says Parsons disengaged and fell back after skirmishing with Ellet's force, and calls the raid a minor setback for the Union. Walker says he received Taylor's order that night to march his division to Berwick Bay.
Retain the original result and engagement interval; later movements and campaign contribution are different measures. No new probabilities or individual causal credit. NPS's 'minor setback' is campaign context.
That night I received General Taylor’s instructions to march my division to Berwick Bay.or24-2-walker-selections-v2, p.466 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
b32764f92373…disputedpost_outcome The frozen casualty text reads Total unknown (US 120; CS unknown); the live field reads 156 total (US 150; CS 6;). Reid reports one lieutenant killed, one severely wounded and two privates wounded in the skirmish, and says the Confederates report 5 or 6 killed; Walker gives 113 soldiers and 3 officers surrendered at the mound.
Original casualty returns were not inspected; preserve totals, categories, cutoffs and differences. No canonical reconciliation or casualty-based opening count; related actions must not be added without resolving population overlap. Surrendered and skirmish losses are different populations; no total is adopted.
Total unknown (US 120; CS unknown)arnold-cwsac-battles, battle LA014; column casualties_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…we had one lieutenant (Becker), of the First Kansas, killed, Lieutenant Thompson severely wounded in the foot, and 2 pri- vates wounded.or24-2-reid-selections-v2, p.450 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
f8d0cd13d828…The rebels report 5 or 6 killed,or24-2-reid-selections-v2, p.450 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
f8d0cd13d828…113 negroes and their 3 white officersor24-2-walker-selections-v2, p.466 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
b32764f92373…responsibility
disputedunresolved Walker says the officers proposed, and Parsons, acting under his orders, accepted, a surrender on condition that they be treated as prisoners of war and the armed Black soldiers surrender unconditionally, and that Tappan approved the convention. NPS instead says the Confederates demanded unconditional surrender and the garrison accepted. NPS says Ellet set out at dawn with Colonel Wood's African-American units. The frozen and live commanders are Ellet, a Brigadier General, and Parsons, a Colonel.
Command roles from one Confederate report and a summary; the surrender terms conflict and neither account is adopted. The frozen commanders do not receive automatic sole credit.
act- ing under my orders,or24-2-walker-selections-v2, p.466 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
b32764f92373…when the officers proposed to surrender upon the condition of being treated as prisoners of war, and the armed negroes unconditionally, Colonel Parsons accepted the terms.or24-2-walker-selections-v2, p.466 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
b32764f92373…approved the convention.or24-2-walker-selections-v2, p.466 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
b32764f92373…decided to demand unconditional surrender first, which the Union forces accepted.nps-la014-v1, Description · snapshot
442b80431d0e…he set out with Col. William F. Wood's African-American units to find the Rebels.nps-la014-v1, Description · snapshot
442b80431d0e…Brigadier Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle LA014, belligerent US, fullname Alfred W. Ellet; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Colonelarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle LA014, belligerent Confederate, fullname William H. Parsons; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…strength
unknownunresolved
No inspected return establishes matched personnel at a common opening boundary. The frozen side-specific numerical strength bounds are blank (missing_numeric_strength). No figure in this pass is adopted as a simultaneous opening force.
supportedunresolved The frozen force field lists the Mississippi Marine Brigade and two African-descent regiments against two Texas cavalry regiments, a Louisiana battalion and two batteries, without counts; the live field reads zero. Walker says Parsons found 113 Black soldiers and 3 white officers in the fortified position. Reid says the Confederate force west of the bayou was variously estimated at 5,000 to 9,000 under Walker, and that part of Parsons' cavalry brigade did the damage.
Garrison, district and raiding-force figures differ in scope; none is adopted as matched opening strength. Live zeros are not measured absence.
Mississippi Marine Brigade, Brigade of 1st Arkansas Volunteers (African Descent) and 10th Louisiana (African Descent) [US]; 12th and 19th Texas cavalry Regiments, 15th Louisiana Cavalry Battalion, Cameron's Louisiana Battery, and Ralston's Mississippi Battery [CS]arnold-cwsac-battles, battle LA014; column forces_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…encountered a force of 113 negroes and their 3 white officers in a fortified position,or24-2-walker-selections-v2, p.466 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
b32764f92373…variously estimated at from 5,000 to 9,000 men,or24-2-reid-selections-v2, p.450 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
f8d0cd13d828…it was a part of [W. H.] Parsons’ brigade of cavalry which did the mischief in this vicinity.or24-2-reid-selections-v2, p.450 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
f8d0cd13d828…terrain
supportedinherited NPS says the Federals had built a fort on an Indian mound to protect leased plantations. Walker says the position, on a high mound whose sides had been scooped and strengthened, was of great strength and would have cost many lives to take by assault.
Inherited relative to the June 29 start; the fort was built beforehand. No map verification or numerical effect.
The Federals had constructed a fort on an Indian mound to protect some of these leased plantations.nps-la014-v1, Description · snapshot
442b80431d0e…The position, upon a high mound, the sides of which had been scooped and otherwise strengthened, was of great strength,or24-2-walker-selections-v2, p.466 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
b32764f92373…Open questions
- Ellet's, Wood's, Parsons's and Tappan's reports and the fate of the soldiers surrendered unconditionally remain deferred.
- NPS/CWSAC is one family. Greene is one retrospective history by a non-participant, founded on the Official Records. Each report author selected from Official Records Volumes XXIV and XXII is a separate family of interested accounts; the volumes are shared containers, not additional witnesses, and letters or telegrams by others quoted inside a selected document are not separate families. Report dates are not event times or proof of contemporary knowledge.
- No automatic commander attribution, causal campaign score, morale/readiness number or battle/campaign double counting.