Belmont MO009
1861-11-07 to 1861-11-07 · MO · Operations at the Ohio and Mississippi River Confluence [November 1861] · frozen result: Union · NPS summary (as listed)
On November 6, 1861, Brig. Gen. U.S. Grant left Cairo, Illinois, by steamers, in conjunction with two gunboats, to make a demonstration against Columbus, Kentucky. The next morning, Grant learned that Confederate troops had crossed the Mississippi River from Columbus to Belmont, Missouri, to intercept two detachments sent in pursuit of Brig. Gen. M. Jeff Thompson and, possibly, to reinforce Maj. Gen. Sterling Price's force. He landed on the Missouri shore, out of the range of Confederate artillery at Columbus, and started marching the mile to Belmont. At 9:00 in the morning, an engagement began. The Federals routed the Confederates out of their Belmont cantonment and destroyed the Rebel supplies and equipment they found because they did not have the means to carry them off. The scattered Confederate forces reorganized and received reinforcements from Columbus. Counterattacked by the Confederates, the Union force withdrew, reembarked, and returned to Cairo. Grant did not accomplish much in this operation, but, at a time when little Union action occurred anywhere, many were heartened by any activity.
Command responsibility (ledger v2)
US: Ulysses S. Grant
Grade A under rule 2; echelon unknown.
Rule 2, single listing. Grant says he was on the field throughout; the description has him land and march on Belmont. The demonstration was directed by 'headquarters Saint Louis' (Western Department), a departmental headquarters not in the field (not labelled). McClernand commanded the First Brigade (subordinate context).
Brigadier Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle MO009, belligerent US, fullname Ulysses S. Grant; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Being on the field myself during the entire engagementor3-grant-belmont-selections-v1 · snapshot
a66b93c94fbe…He landed on the Missouri shore, out of the range of Confederate artillery at Columbus, and started marching the mile to Belmont.arnold-cwsac-battles, battle MO009; column description · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Confederate: Gideon Pillow
Grade A under rule 2; echelon division. command_changedsuperior_directing
Rule 2, single listing. Pillow crossed four regiments of his division and formed the line that received the first attack. He crossed under Polk's instructions, and Polk sent reinforcements; Polk then crossed and 'the pursuit was continued under the immediate command and direc tion of Major-General Polk' (rule 4, successor Polk; superior_directing: Polk). Polk is a passage-only entry for this record ('Major-General Polk' in Pillow's report). No inspected passage or listing field identifies him with KY009's passage-only 'General Polk' or the MS012 listing 'Leonidas Polk', so he stays separate under the addendum's surname-only rule.
Brigadier Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle MO009, belligerent Confederate, fullname Gideon J. Pillow; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…I crossed to the village of Belmont, on the Missouri shore, four regiments of my divisionor3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1 · snapshot
bd9b99eba37e…I had barely got the forces in position when the skirmishers were driven in and the shock took placeor3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1 · snapshot
bd9b99eba37e…Side strength (ledger v3)
US: grade B, 3,110 (2,650–7,450)
basis_mixedwhole_engagement_leakage
| Input | Class | Printed | Basis | Bound | Codes | Passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| us-grant-3114 | B | 3,114 | unknown | dossier claim reported-force-scope | ||
| us-grant-planned | bound | 3,000 | unknown | upper | engagement_link_unknownone_sided_bound | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
| us-pillow-7450 | C | 7,450 | unknown | adversary_or_hearsay_estimate | dossier claim reported-force-scope | |
| us-pillow-cavalry | bound | 450 | unknown | lower | adversary_or_hearsay_estimatepartial_scope | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
Confederate: grade B, 5,000 (4,250–5,750)
basis_mixedderivation_unknownsingle_inputwhole_engagement_leakage
| Input | Class | Printed | Basis | Bound | Codes | Passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cs-grant-9000 | bound | 9,000 | unknown | lower | adversary_or_hearsay_estimateone_sided_bound | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
| cs-pillow-2500 | bound | 2,500 | unknown | lower | partial_scope | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
| cs-pillow-2000 | bound | 2,000 | unknown | lower | partial_scope | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
| cs-clodfelter | B | 5,000 | unknown | derivation_unknown | 5000arnold-clodfelter-forces, battle_id Belmont, belligerent Confederate; column strength · snapshot 96430f3626d3… |
Dossier claims
Draft dossier, revision belmont-1861-review-correction-2026-09-25. Claims are extraction records with their quoted passages, not historical adjudication. JSON
information
supportedunresolved Grant says that at about 2 a.m. on the 7th Wallace reported, from a Union man, that the enemy had been crossing troops to Belmont to cut off Oglesby. Pillow says his imperfect knowledge of the field would itself have embarrassed him.
Knowledge attributed in the two reports; no message log inspected.
About 2 o'clock on the morning of the 7th I received information from Col. W. H. L. Wallace at Charlestonor3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.269 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
a66b93c94fbe…that the enemy had been crossing troops from Columbus to Belmont the day beforeor3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.269 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
a66b93c94fbe…my imperfect knowledge of the surroundings of the field would of itself have embarrassed meor3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.325 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
bd9b99eba37e…logistics
supportedunresolved Grant moved by steamers convoyed by the gunboats Tyler and Lexington, and without wagons could carry off little captured property. Pillow says his battery and one regiment ran out of ammunition and he fell back to the river for want of reinforcements and ammunition.
Transport and ammunition conditions from the two reports; not returns.
The gunboats Tyler, Captain Walke, and Lexington, Captain Stem- bel, convoyed the expeditionor3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.271 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
a66b93c94fbe…Having no wagons with me, I could move but little of the cap tured proj)ertyor3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.270 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
a66b93c94fbe…At length Colonel Beltzhoover reported to me that his ammunition was exhausted.or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.326 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
bd9b99eba37e…Finding it impossible longer to maintain my position without re- enforcements and ammunition, I ordered the whole line to fall back to the river bank.or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.326 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
bd9b99eba37e…objectives
disputedunresolved Grant set out to make a demonstration against Columbus and says the Wallace report decided him to attack at Belmont, re-embarking under the gunboats if repulsed; his November 20 report says the object, preventing reinforcement of Price and the cutting off of his two columns, was fully accomplished. Pillow crossed on Polk's instructions to meet the advancing force. NPS says Grant did not accomplish much in this operation.
Stated aims from the two reports; Grant's November 20 statement is his own after-action assessment. Grant's own after-action assessment and the NPS assessment differ; neither is a campaign-contribution finding.
to make the demonstration against Columbus.or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.269 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
a66b93c94fbe…This information determined me to attack vigor ously his forces at Belmontor3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.270 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
a66b93c94fbe…The object aimed at, to wit, to prevent the enemy from re-enforcing Price in Missourior3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.273 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
a66b93c94fbe…Under instructions delivered in person by Major-General Polkor3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.325 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
bd9b99eba37e…was ac complished to the fullest extent.or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.273 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
a66b93c94fbe…outcome
disputedpost_outcome The frozen and live results read Union victory; NPS says the Union force withdrew and re-embarked after the Confederate counterattack. Grant says his troops charged and again defeated the enemy who came between them and the transports; Pillow calls the day glorious to Confederate arms and a victory scarcely paralleled.
Retain the original result and engagement interval; later movements and campaign contribution are different measures. No new probabilities or individual causal credit.
the Union force withdrew, reembarked, and returned to Cairo.nps-mo009-v1, Description · snapshot
e17a253e2401…Our troops were not in the least discouraged, but charged the enemy and again defeated him.or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.270 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
a66b93c94fbe…This ended the day, so glorious to our armsor3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.328 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
bd9b99eba37e…a victory scarcely having a parallel in historyor3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.328 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
bd9b99eba37e…disputedpost_outcome The frozen casualty text reads 1,464 (US 498; CS 966); the live field reads 1,248 (US 607; CS 641). Grant reports 85 killed, 301 wounded and 99 missing, 175 prisoners taken, and later the enemy's killed and wounded as not less than a figure read 'GOO' in OCR. Pillow's November 9 dispatch gives his loss as about 400 and says the enemy's was double his; his report transmits a list (not printed) numbering a figure read 'G32', 562 of them in the force first engaged, says 295 Union dead were buried and estimates the Union loss at not less than 2,000; on November 12 he gives his division's loss as 530.
Original casualty returns were not inspected; preserve totals, categories, cutoffs and differences. No canonical reconciliation or casualty-based opening count; related actions must not be added without resolving population overlap. OCR-garbled figures are retained as printed in the scan.
1,464 total (US 498; CS 966)arnold-cwsac-battles, battle MO009; column casualties_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Our loss in killed on the field was 85. 301 wounded (many of them, however, slightly), and 99 missing.or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.271 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
a66b93c94fbe…We captured 175 prisonersor3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.272 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
a66b93c94fbe…their loss in killed and wounded alone not less than GOO.or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.272 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
a66b93c94fbe…a severe loss for the forces engaged, about 400.or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.325 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
bd9b99eba37e…The enemy's double ours.or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.325 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
bd9b99eba37e…numbering G32. Of this num ber 562 were of my own division and Tappan's regimentor3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.329 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
bd9b99eba37e…we buried of the enemy 295or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.329 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
bd9b99eba37e…I think the enemy's loss could not be less than 2,000 men.or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.330 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
bd9b99eba37e…My loss in the battle of Belmont from my division was 530 menor3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.330 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
bd9b99eba37e…responsibility
supportedunresolved The frozen commanders are Brigadier Generals Gideon J. Pillow and Ulysses S. Grant; the live page gives Grant as Lieutenant General. Pillow crossed under Polk's orders, placed Marks at the head of the flanking column, and says Polk ordered the pursuit continued with the whole force. Grant praises McClernand and says his own horse was shot under him.
Command roles from the two reports; Polk's part is attributed as Pillow gives it. No automatic sole credit, and the live rank is not adopted.
Brigadier Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle MO009, belligerent Confederate, fullname Gideon J. Pillow; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Brigadier Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle MO009, belligerent US, fullname Ulysses S. Grant; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…I immediately placed these fresh troops under the command of the gal lant old veteran Colonel Marksor3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.327 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
bd9b99eba37e…General Polk ordered the pursuit continued with the whole forceor3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.327 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
bd9b99eba37e…General McClernand was in the midst of danger throughout the en gagementor3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.271 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
a66b93c94fbe…My own horse was shot under me during the engagement.or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.271 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
a66b93c94fbe…strength
unknownunresolved
No inspected return establishes matched personnel at a common opening boundary. The frozen side-specific numerical strength bounds are blank (missing_numeric_strength). No figure in this pass is adopted as a simultaneous opening force.
disputedunresolved The frozen force field reads Division for each side; the live field reads zero. Grant says his expedition amounted to 3,114 men of all arms (on November 5 he expected probably not more than 3,000), and later that Southern sources put the enemy in the field at over 9,000. Pillow says his four regiments had been reduced to below 500 men for duty (the sentence does not say whether each or together) and numbered about 2,500 all told, that he fought 2,000 men against 7,450, and that he withstood three times his number; on November 12 he gives his division about 2,700 effective after its losses. He puts the Union cavalry at 450.
Embarked, engaged and after-action figures of different scopes, with each side's estimate of the other and reinforcements from Columbus during the day. None is adopted as a matched opening strength. The live zero is not measured absence.
Division [US]; division [CS]arnold-cwsac-battles, battle MO009; column forces_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…amounting to 3,114 men of all armsor3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.269 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
a66b93c94fbe…probably not more than 3,000 men.or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.273 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
a66b93c94fbe…the enemy's force in the field to have been over 9,000 menor3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.272 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
a66b93c94fbe…had been reduced to below 500 meu for duty, as shown by the daily morning report.or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.325 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
bd9b99eba37e…These regiments, all told, numbered about 2,500 men.or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.325 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
bd9b99eba37e…We fought 2,000 men for four hours against 7,450.or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.325 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
bd9b99eba37e…withstood the constant fire of three times their numberor3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.328 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
bd9b99eba37e…this bringing my effective force to about 2,700or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.330 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
bd9b99eba37e…said to be 450 strong.or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.325 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
bd9b99eba37e…terrain
supportedunresolved Grant says Belmont lies on low ground commanded by the guns across the river, and that the camp was protected by felled timber forming a sort of abatis. Pillow says a line of felled timber helped defeat the attempt on his left, and that he had no choice of position and no time to reconnoitre.
Ground and prepared obstacles described by the two opposing commanders; no map verification.
Belmont is situated on low ground, and every foot is commanded by the guns on the opposite shoreor3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.270 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
a66b93c94fbe…Here he had strengthened his position by felling the timber for several hundred yards around his camp, making a sort of abatis.or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.270 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
a66b93c94fbe…aided by a line of felled timberor3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.325 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
bd9b99eba37e…I had no choice of position, nor time to make any reconnaissanceor3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.325 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
bd9b99eba37e…Open questions
- Polk's No. 14 reports, McClernand's, Walke's and the regimental reports on both sides, Brinton's medical report, Pillow's casualty list (not found by the compilers), returns and maps remain deferred. Manning F. Force's From Fort Henry to Corinth (Scribner, 1881) was located (its index lists Belmont at pp.19-21) but not read or selected: the three-family ceiling was taken by the two commanders' reports.
- NPS/CWSAC (the live battle page and the frozen Arnold rows) is one family. Grant's November 5, 17 and 20, 1861 reports are one family of interested Union accounts, the same author family as the registered Grant Shiloh report and memoirs (group or-grant); the November 17 report is dated as printed in the OCR. Pillow's November 9, 10 and 12, 1861 reports are one family of interested Confederate accounts. Official Records volumes are shared containers, not additional witnesses. Report dates are not event times or proof of contemporary knowledge.
- No automatic commander attribution, causal campaign score, morale/readiness number or battle/campaign double counting.