Belmont MO009

1861-11-07 to 1861-11-07 · MO · Operations at the Ohio and Mississippi River Confluence [November 1861] · frozen result: Union · NPS summary (as listed)

CWSAC description
On November 6, 1861, Brig. Gen. U.S. Grant left Cairo, Illinois, by steamers, in conjunction with two gunboats, to make a demonstration against Columbus, Kentucky. The next morning, Grant learned that Confederate troops had crossed the Mississippi River from Columbus to Belmont, Missouri, to intercept two detachments sent in pursuit of Brig. Gen. M. Jeff Thompson and, possibly, to reinforce Maj. Gen. Sterling Price's force. He landed on the Missouri shore, out of the range of Confederate artillery at Columbus, and started marching the mile to Belmont. At 9:00 in the morning, an engagement began. The Federals routed the Confederates out of their Belmont cantonment and destroyed the Rebel supplies and equipment they found because they did not have the means to carry them off. The scattered Confederate forces reorganized and received reinforcements from Columbus. Counterattacked by the Confederates, the Union force withdrew, reembarked, and returned to Cairo. Grant did not accomplish much in this operation, but, at a time when little Union action occurred anywhere, many were heartened by any activity.

Command responsibility (ledger v2)

US: Ulysses S. Grant

Grade A under rule 2; echelon unknown.

Rule 2, single listing. Grant says he was on the field throughout; the description has him land and march on Belmont. The demonstration was directed by 'headquarters Saint Louis' (Western Department), a departmental headquarters not in the field (not labelled). McClernand commanded the First Brigade (subordinate context).

Brigadier General
arnold-cwsac-commanders, battle MO009, belligerent US, fullname Ulysses S. Grant; column rank · snapshot 6c587c298717…
Being on the field myself during the entire engagement
or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1 · snapshot a66b93c94fbe…
He landed on the Missouri shore, out of the range of Confederate artillery at Columbus, and started marching the mile to Belmont.
arnold-cwsac-battles, battle MO009; column description · snapshot 952b5d08402a…

Confederate: Gideon Pillow

Grade A under rule 2; echelon division. command_changedsuperior_directing

Rule 2, single listing. Pillow crossed four regiments of his division and formed the line that received the first attack. He crossed under Polk's instructions, and Polk sent reinforcements; Polk then crossed and 'the pursuit was continued under the immediate command and direc tion of Major-General Polk' (rule 4, successor Polk; superior_directing: Polk). Polk is a passage-only entry for this record ('Major-General Polk' in Pillow's report). No inspected passage or listing field identifies him with KY009's passage-only 'General Polk' or the MS012 listing 'Leonidas Polk', so he stays separate under the addendum's surname-only rule.

Brigadier General
arnold-cwsac-commanders, battle MO009, belligerent Confederate, fullname Gideon J. Pillow; column rank · snapshot 6c587c298717…
I crossed to the village of Belmont, on the Missouri shore, four regiments of my division
or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1 · snapshot bd9b99eba37e…
I had barely got the forces in position when the skirmishers were driven in and the shock took place
or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1 · snapshot bd9b99eba37e…

Side strength (ledger v3)

US: grade B, 3,110 (2,650–7,450)

basis_mixedwhole_engagement_leakage

InputClassPrintedBasisBoundCodesPassage
us-grant-3114B3,114unknowndossier claim reported-force-scope
us-grant-plannedbound3,000unknownupperengagement_link_unknownone_sided_bounddossier claim reported-force-scope
us-pillow-7450C7,450unknownadversary_or_hearsay_estimatedossier claim reported-force-scope
us-pillow-cavalrybound450unknownloweradversary_or_hearsay_estimatepartial_scopedossier claim reported-force-scope

Confederate: grade B, 5,000 (4,250–5,750)

basis_mixedderivation_unknownsingle_inputwhole_engagement_leakage

InputClassPrintedBasisBoundCodesPassage
cs-grant-9000bound9,000unknownloweradversary_or_hearsay_estimateone_sided_bounddossier claim reported-force-scope
cs-pillow-2500bound2,500unknownlowerpartial_scopedossier claim reported-force-scope
cs-pillow-2000bound2,000unknownlowerpartial_scopedossier claim reported-force-scope
cs-clodfelterB5,000unknownderivation_unknown
5000
arnold-clodfelter-forces, battle_id Belmont, belligerent Confederate; column strength · snapshot 96430f3626d3…

Dossier claims

Draft dossier, revision belmont-1861-review-correction-2026-09-25. Claims are extraction records with their quoted passages, not historical adjudication. JSON

information

supportedunresolved Grant says that at about 2 a.m. on the 7th Wallace reported, from a Union man, that the enemy had been crossing troops to Belmont to cut off Oglesby. Pillow says his imperfect knowledge of the field would itself have embarrassed him.

Knowledge attributed in the two reports; no message log inspected.

About 2 o'clock on the morning of the 7th I received information from Col. W. H. L. Wallace at Charleston
or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.269 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot a66b93c94fbe…
that the enemy had been crossing troops from Columbus to Belmont the day before
or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.269 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot a66b93c94fbe…
my imperfect knowledge of the surroundings of the field would of itself have embarrassed me
or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.325 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot bd9b99eba37e…

logistics

supportedunresolved Grant moved by steamers convoyed by the gunboats Tyler and Lexington, and without wagons could carry off little captured property. Pillow says his battery and one regiment ran out of ammunition and he fell back to the river for want of reinforcements and ammunition.

Transport and ammunition conditions from the two reports; not returns.

The gunboats Tyler, Captain Walke, and Lexington, Captain Stem- bel, convoyed the expedition
or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.271 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot a66b93c94fbe…
Having no wagons with me, I could move but little of the cap tured proj)erty
or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.270 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot a66b93c94fbe…
At length Colonel Beltzhoover reported to me that his ammunition was exhausted.
or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.326 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot bd9b99eba37e…
Finding it impossible longer to maintain my position without re- enforcements and ammunition, I ordered the whole line to fall back to the river bank.
or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.326 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot bd9b99eba37e…

objectives

disputedunresolved Grant set out to make a demonstration against Columbus and says the Wallace report decided him to attack at Belmont, re-embarking under the gunboats if repulsed; his November 20 report says the object, preventing reinforcement of Price and the cutting off of his two columns, was fully accomplished. Pillow crossed on Polk's instructions to meet the advancing force. NPS says Grant did not accomplish much in this operation.

Stated aims from the two reports; Grant's November 20 statement is his own after-action assessment. Grant's own after-action assessment and the NPS assessment differ; neither is a campaign-contribution finding.

to make the demonstration against Columbus.
or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.269 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot a66b93c94fbe…
This information determined me to attack vigor ously his forces at Belmont
or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.270 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot a66b93c94fbe…
The object aimed at, to wit, to prevent the enemy from re-enforcing Price in Missouri
or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.273 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot a66b93c94fbe…
Under instructions delivered in person by Major-General Polk
or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.325 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot bd9b99eba37e…
was ac complished to the fullest extent.
or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.273 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot a66b93c94fbe…
Grant did not accomplish much in this operation
nps-mo009-v1, Description · snapshot e17a253e2401…

outcome

disputedpost_outcome The frozen and live results read Union victory; NPS says the Union force withdrew and re-embarked after the Confederate counterattack. Grant says his troops charged and again defeated the enemy who came between them and the transports; Pillow calls the day glorious to Confederate arms and a victory scarcely paralleled.

Retain the original result and engagement interval; later movements and campaign contribution are different measures. No new probabilities or individual causal credit.

Union victory
arnold-cwsac-battles, battle MO009; column results_text · snapshot 952b5d08402a…
Union Victory
nps-mo009-v1, Results · snapshot e17a253e2401…
the Union force withdrew, reembarked, and returned to Cairo.
nps-mo009-v1, Description · snapshot e17a253e2401…
Our troops were not in the least discouraged, but charged the enemy and again defeated him.
or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.270 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot a66b93c94fbe…
This ended the day, so glorious to our arms
or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.328 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot bd9b99eba37e…
a victory scarcely having a parallel in history
or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.328 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot bd9b99eba37e…

disputedpost_outcome The frozen casualty text reads 1,464 (US 498; CS 966); the live field reads 1,248 (US 607; CS 641). Grant reports 85 killed, 301 wounded and 99 missing, 175 prisoners taken, and later the enemy's killed and wounded as not less than a figure read 'GOO' in OCR. Pillow's November 9 dispatch gives his loss as about 400 and says the enemy's was double his; his report transmits a list (not printed) numbering a figure read 'G32', 562 of them in the force first engaged, says 295 Union dead were buried and estimates the Union loss at not less than 2,000; on November 12 he gives his division's loss as 530.

Original casualty returns were not inspected; preserve totals, categories, cutoffs and differences. No canonical reconciliation or casualty-based opening count; related actions must not be added without resolving population overlap. OCR-garbled figures are retained as printed in the scan.

1,464 total (US 498; CS 966)
arnold-cwsac-battles, battle MO009; column casualties_text · snapshot 952b5d08402a…
1248 total (US 607; CS 641;)
nps-mo009-v1, Estimated Casualties · snapshot e17a253e2401…
Our loss in killed on the field was 85. 301 wounded (many of them, however, slightly), and 99 missing.
or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.271 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot a66b93c94fbe…
We captured 175 prisoners
or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.272 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot a66b93c94fbe…
their loss in killed and wounded alone not less than GOO.
or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.272 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot a66b93c94fbe…
a severe loss for the forces engaged, about 400.
or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.325 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot bd9b99eba37e…
The enemy's double ours.
or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.325 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot bd9b99eba37e…
numbering G32. Of this num ber 562 were of my own division and Tappan's regiment
or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.329 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot bd9b99eba37e…
we buried of the enemy 295
or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.329 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot bd9b99eba37e…
I think the enemy's loss could not be less than 2,000 men.
or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.330 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot bd9b99eba37e…
My loss in the battle of Belmont from my division was 530 men
or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.330 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot bd9b99eba37e…

responsibility

supportedunresolved The frozen commanders are Brigadier Generals Gideon J. Pillow and Ulysses S. Grant; the live page gives Grant as Lieutenant General. Pillow crossed under Polk's orders, placed Marks at the head of the flanking column, and says Polk ordered the pursuit continued with the whole force. Grant praises McClernand and says his own horse was shot under him.

Command roles from the two reports; Polk's part is attributed as Pillow gives it. No automatic sole credit, and the live rank is not adopted.

Brigadier General
arnold-cwsac-commanders, battle MO009, belligerent Confederate, fullname Gideon J. Pillow; column rank · snapshot 6c587c298717…
Brigadier General
arnold-cwsac-commanders, battle MO009, belligerent US, fullname Ulysses S. Grant; column rank · snapshot 6c587c298717…
Lieutenant General Ulysses Grant [US]
nps-mo009-v1, Principal Commanders · snapshot e17a253e2401…
I immediately placed these fresh troops under the command of the gal lant old veteran Colonel Marks
or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.327 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot bd9b99eba37e…
General Polk ordered the pursuit continued with the whole force
or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.327 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot bd9b99eba37e…
General McClernand was in the midst of danger throughout the en gagement
or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.271 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot a66b93c94fbe…
My own horse was shot under me during the engagement.
or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.271 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot a66b93c94fbe…

strength

unknownunresolved

No inspected return establishes matched personnel at a common opening boundary. The frozen side-specific numerical strength bounds are blank (missing_numeric_strength). No figure in this pass is adopted as a simultaneous opening force.

disputedunresolved The frozen force field reads Division for each side; the live field reads zero. Grant says his expedition amounted to 3,114 men of all arms (on November 5 he expected probably not more than 3,000), and later that Southern sources put the enemy in the field at over 9,000. Pillow says his four regiments had been reduced to below 500 men for duty (the sentence does not say whether each or together) and numbered about 2,500 all told, that he fought 2,000 men against 7,450, and that he withstood three times his number; on November 12 he gives his division about 2,700 effective after its losses. He puts the Union cavalry at 450.

Embarked, engaged and after-action figures of different scopes, with each side's estimate of the other and reinforcements from Columbus during the day. None is adopted as a matched opening strength. The live zero is not measured absence.

Division [US]; division [CS]
arnold-cwsac-battles, battle MO009; column forces_text · snapshot 952b5d08402a…
0 total (US 0; CS 0;)
nps-mo009-v1, Forces Engaged · snapshot e17a253e2401…
amounting to 3,114 men of all arms
or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.269 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot a66b93c94fbe…
probably not more than 3,000 men.
or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.273 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot a66b93c94fbe…
the enemy's force in the field to have been over 9,000 men
or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.272 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot a66b93c94fbe…
had been reduced to below 500 meu for duty, as shown by the daily morning report.
or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.325 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot bd9b99eba37e…
These regiments, all told, numbered about 2,500 men.
or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.325 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot bd9b99eba37e…
We fought 2,000 men for four hours against 7,450.
or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.325 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot bd9b99eba37e…
withstood the constant fire of three times their number
or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.328 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot bd9b99eba37e…
this bringing my effective force to about 2,700
or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.330 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot bd9b99eba37e…
said to be 450 strong.
or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.325 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot bd9b99eba37e…

terrain

supportedunresolved Grant says Belmont lies on low ground commanded by the guns across the river, and that the camp was protected by felled timber forming a sort of abatis. Pillow says a line of felled timber helped defeat the attempt on his left, and that he had no choice of position and no time to reconnoitre.

Ground and prepared obstacles described by the two opposing commanders; no map verification.

Belmont is situated on low ground, and every foot is commanded by the guns on the opposite shore
or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.270 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot a66b93c94fbe…
Here he had strengthened his position by felling the timber for several hundred yards around his camp, making a sort of abatis.
or3-grant-belmont-selections-v1, p.270 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot a66b93c94fbe…
aided by a line of felled timber
or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.325 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot bd9b99eba37e…
I had no choice of position, nor time to make any reconnaissance
or3-pillow-belmont-selections-v1, p.325 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot bd9b99eba37e…

Open questions