Stony Lake ND003
1863-07-28 to 1863-07-28 · ND · Operations Against the Sioux in North Dakota [July 1863] · frozen result: Union · NPS summary (as listed)
Following the Battle of Dead Buffalo Lake, Brig. Gen. Henry Hastings Sibley continued his march after the retreating Sioux until he reached Stony Lake, where his animals' exhaustion compelled him to encamp. On the 28th, the force had started out in pursuit again when Sibley discovered that a large number of Sioux was moving upon him. He ordered the men to make defensive preparations, which many had already accomplished. In the face of enemy, Sibley now resumed his march. The Sioux searched for weak points in the soldiers position. Finding none, the Sioux rode off at great speed, preventing pursuit. The Sioux had hoped to halt Sibley's advance but were unable to do so. Sibley remarked in his report that Stony Lake was "the greatest conflict between our troops and the Indians, so far as the numbers were concerned."
Dossier claims
Draft dossier, revision sioux-dakota-1863-review-correction-2026-09-25. Claims are extraction records with their quoted passages, not historical adjudication. JSON
information
supportedunresolved Sibley saw a large mounted force moving on the column while part of the wagons were still in camp; Crooks says the attack came as the column was forming and the transportation was scattered.
Timing and knowledge attributed in interested reports; no message log inspected.
I perceived a large force of mounted Indians moving rapidly upon us.or22-1-sibley-dakota-selections-v1, p.355 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
171105e9742a…as the column was forming on the morning of the 28th, and the transportation was somewhat scatteredor22-1-crooks-dakota-selections-v1, p.362 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
05b6fc721ea4…logistics
supportedunresolved Sibley says exhaustion of the animals forced the halt at Stony Lake with scarce grass, and his jaded horses could not overtake the retreating Indians.
Animal condition from an interested report; not a return.
where the exhaustion of the animals required me to encamp, although grass was very scarce.or22-1-sibley-dakota-selections-v1, p.355 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
171105e9742a…with our jaded horsesor22-1-sibley-dakota-selections-v1, p.356 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
171105e9742a…objectives
supportedunresolved Sibley calls the attack the combined bands' last effort to stop his advance toward their families; Crooks says it aimed to destroy the transportation and delay the advance so the families could escape.
Aims inferred by opponents. No account by the Dakota bands was inspected; their numbers, aims and losses come from their opponents' estimates, prisoners' or scouts' statements relayed by them, or the NPS summary.
This engagement was the last desperate effort of the combined Dakota bands to prevent a farther advance on our part toward their families.or22-1-sibley-dakota-selections-v1, p.356 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
171105e9742a…First, to de- stroy our transportation, and, second, to delay our advance, allowing their families more time to escape.or22-1-crooks-dakota-selections-v1, p.363 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
05b6fc721ea4…outcome
supportedpost_outcome The frozen and live results read Union victory. Sibley says the Indians fired parting volleys and retreated; NPS quotes his description of the largest conflict by numbers.
Retain the original result and engagement interval; later movements and campaign contribution are different measures. No new probabilities or individual causal credit.
and then retreated with all expedition.or22-1-sibley-dakota-selections-v1, p.356 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
171105e9742a…"the greatest conflict between our troops and the Indians, so far as the numbers were concerned."nps-nd003-v1, Description · snapshot
003e683f6671…supportedpost_outcome The frozen casualty text reads Unknown; the live field reads 0 (US 0; CS 0). No inspected report gives a loss for July 28 alone; Sibley's at least 150 covers all three engagements.
Original casualty returns were not inspected; preserve totals, categories, cutoffs and differences. No canonical reconciliation or casualty-based opening count; related actions must not be added without resolving population overlap. The live zeros are not adopted as measured losses.
responsibility
supportedunresolved The frozen US commander is Brigadier General Henry Hastings Sibley. The frozen and live Native American commander is Inkpaduta (no rank; the live page tags him [CS], not adopted); none of the inspected reports names him, so his role is not established here. Sibley says the regiments took their positions before his orders reached them and that he formed the column in line of battle and resumed the march; Crooks credits Averill's deployment.
Command roles from interested reports; no automatic sole credit.
Brigadier Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle ND003, belligerent US, fullname Henry Hastings Sibley; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Inkpadutaarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle ND003, belligerent Native American, fullname Inkpaduta; column fullname · snapshot
6c587c298717…before the orders reached them.or22-1-sibley-dakota-selections-v1, p.355 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
171105e9742a…and I resumed my march without any delay.or22-1-sibley-dakota-selections-v1, p.356 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
171105e9742a…Lieutenant-Colonel Averill commenced de- ploying the right wingor22-1-crooks-dakota-selections-v1, p.362 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
05b6fc721ea4…strength
unknownunresolved
No inspected return establishes matched personnel at a common opening boundary. The frozen side-specific numerical strength bounds are blank (missing_numeric_strength). No figure in this pass is adopted as a simultaneous opening force.
supportedunresolved The frozen force field names the District of Minnesota and the Santee and Teton Sioux without figures; the live field reads 0. Sibley estimates the warriors at no less than 2,200 to 2,500 and, from various sources including the Indians' own conversations with his half-breed scouts, the combined camp at nearly 10,000 souls, formed by the remnant of the bands that escaped with Little Crow joining the Sissetons, the Cut-heads and the Chank-ton-ais; his naming of Little Crow's band is not evidence about Inkpaduta. Crooks gives at least 2,000 mounted men.
Opponents' estimates of the attacking force on July 28 (2,200 to 2,500; at least 2,000) and of the whole combined camp (10,000 souls, undated, from various sources including the Indians' conversations with his half-breed scouts), of different scopes. No account by the Dakota bands was inspected; their numbers, aims and losses come from their opponents' estimates, prisoners' or scouts' statements relayed by them, or the NPS summary. None is adopted as a matched opening strength.
District of Minnesota [US]; Santee and Teton Sioux [I]arnold-cwsac-battles, battle ND003; column forces_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…than from 2,200 to 2,500.or22-1-sibley-dakota-selections-v1, p.356 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
171105e9742a…including that obtained from the savages themselves, in their conversations with our half- breed scoutsor22-1-sibley-dakota-selections-v1, p.356 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
171105e9742a…the remnant of the bands who escaped with Little Crow had successively joined the Sissetons, the Cut-heads, and finally the Chank-ton-aisor22-1-sibley-dakota-selections-v1, p.356 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
171105e9742a…an enormous camp of nearly, or quite, 10,000 souls.or22-1-sibley-dakota-selections-v1, p.356 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
171105e9742a…of 2,000 mounted men, at leastor22-1-crooks-dakota-selections-v1, p.362 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
05b6fc721ea4…terrain
supportedunresolved Sibley says the train was toiling up a long hill when the Indians formed two-thirds of a circle 5 or 6 miles long; Crooks's regiment held the center on the north side of the lake.
Ground and the attackers' deployment from interested reports; tag unresolved. No map verification.
as the train toiled up the long hill.or22-1-sibley-dakota-selections-v1, p.355 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
171105e9742a…to form two-thirds of a circle, 5 or 6 miles in ex- tentor22-1-sibley-dakota-selections-v1, p.356 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
171105e9742a…and being upon the north side of the lakeor22-1-crooks-dakota-selections-v1, p.362 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
05b6fc721ea4…Open questions
- Baker's report (the Tenth led the column that morning), Marshall's report, the Dakota account and maps remain deferred. No targeted follow-up was used for this record.
- NPS/CWSAC (the live battle page and the frozen Arnold rows) is one family. Sibley's August 7, 1863 report covers all three July engagements and is an interested account; Crooks's August 5 report (Sixth Minnesota) also covers all three and is a separate family. Official Records volumes are shared containers, not additional witnesses. Report dates are not event times or proof of contemporary knowledge.
- No automatic commander attribution, causal campaign score, morale/readiness number or battle/campaign double counting. Participants are named as the sources name them; characterizations in the sources (including 'hostile', 'savages', 'massacre' or 'battle') are quoted as the sources' own words and not adopted.