Cabin Creek OK006
1863-07-01 to 1863-07-02 · OK · Operations to Control Indian Territory [June-September 1863] · frozen result: Union · NPS summary (as listed)
Col. James M. Williams of the First Kansas Colored Infantry led a Union supply train from Fort Scott, Kansas, to Fort Gibson, Oklahoma (then Indian Territory). As he approached the crossing of Cabin Creek, he learned that Confederate Col. Stand Watie, with about 1,600 to 1,800 men intended to assault him there. Watie was waiting for about 1,500 reinforcements under the command of Brig. Gen. William L. Cabell to join him before attacking the supply train. Cabell, however, was detained due to high water on Grand River. Cabin Creek also had high water, preventing a crossing at first, but when it had receded enough, Williams drove the Confederates off with artillery fire and two cavalry charges. The wagon train continued to Fort Gibson and delivered the supplies, making it possible for the Union forces to maintain their presence in Indian territory and take the offensive that resulted in a victory at Honey Springs and the fall of Fort Smith, Arkansas.
Command responsibility (ledger v2)
US: James M. Williams
Grade C under rule 2; echelon unknown. responsibility_unresolved
Other candidates: Theodore H. Dodd
At the first contact on July 1 Williams, 'the ranking officer present' (Britton, which states rank, not command), ordered up his howitzer to fire with Foreman's; that evening he and Dodd agreed to unite the available troops 'under him', and he laid and led the July 2 attack. At first contact on July 1 the escort, including Foreman's skirmishers, was under Dodd (Williams: 'Lieutenant-Colonel [Theodore H.] Dodd, commanding escort to the train'; Britton: 'The escort to the train was commanded by Lieutenant-Colonel Theodore H. Dodd'), and Williams accompanied the train with his own regiment and section ('I concluded to accompany this train'); the forces were united under Williams only that evening. The description has Williams leading the train. Sources disagree about who commanded at first combat and no passage names another officer over all the engaged forces, so the listed Williams is kept (rule 2, grade C, responsibility_unresolved, Dodd as candidate).
Colonelarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle OK006, belligerent US, fullname James M. Williams; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Colonel Williams, the ranking officer present,britton-indian-territory-1863-selections-v1 · snapshot
8c95dace0b2e…I laid the plan of attack as follows,or22-1-williams-cabin-creek-selections-v1 · snapshot
7be9ec6b674c…I ordered up one of the 12-pounder howitzers attached to my command, which, with the mountain howitzers of Major Foreman, opened a brisk fireor22-1-williams-cabin-creek-selections-v1 · snapshot
7be9ec6b674c…Lieutenant-Colonel [Theodore H.] Dodd, commanding escort to the train,or22-1-williams-cabin-creek-selections-v1 · snapshot
7be9ec6b674c…The escort to the train was commanded by Lieutenant-Colonel Theo dore H. Doddbritton-indian-territory-1863-selections-v1 · snapshot
8c95dace0b2e…I concluded to accompany this train on the route,or22-1-williams-cabin-creek-selections-v1 · snapshot
7be9ec6b674c…to unite under him all the troops that could be spared from the immediate defence of the trainbritton-indian-territory-1863-selections-v1 · snapshot
8c95dace0b2e…Col. James M. Williams of the First Kansas Colored Infantry led a Union supply train from Fort Scott, Kansas, to Fort Gibson, Oklahoma (then Indian Territory).arnold-cwsac-battles, battle OK006; column description · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Confederate: Stand Watie
Grade A under rule 2; echelon detachment_or_post. superior_directing
Britton, from prisoners' statements, says Watie commanded the expedition; the description agrees (rule 2, grade A). Cooper sent the expedition (superior_directing: Cooper); Cabell's expected reinforcement did not arrive.
Colonelarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle OK006, belligerent Confederate, fullname Stand Watie; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Colonel Watie was in command of the expedition sent out by General Cooper,britton-indian-territory-1863-selections-v1 · snapshot
8c95dace0b2e…Side strength (ledger v3)
US: grade D: no usable figure (modelled in the rating runs)
whole_engagement_leakage
| Input | Class | Printed | Basis | Bound | Codes | Passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| us-williams-column | bound | 900 | unknown | one_sided_boundpartial_scope | dossier claim reported-force-scope | |
| us-foreman | bound | 600 | unknown | lower | partial_scope | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
Confederate: grade A, 1,500 (1,430–1,790)
compiled_dependencederivation_unknownwhole_engagement_leakage
| Input | Class | Printed | Basis | Bound | Codes | Passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cs-cw | A | 1,600–1,800 | reported_engaged | derivation_unknown | 1,600-1,800arnold-cwsac-forces, battle OK006, belligerent Confederate; column description · snapshot a462f6be964b… | |
| cs-nps | A | 1,500 | reported_engaged | derivation_unknown | dossier claim reported-force-scope | |
| cs-nps-desc | B | 1,600–1,800 | unknown | derivation_unknown | dossier claim reported-force-scope | |
| cs-prisoners | C | 1,600–1,800 | unknown | adversary_or_hearsay_estimate | dossier claim reported-force-scope | |
| cs-texas-600 | bound | 600 | unknown | adversary_or_hearsay_estimatepartial_scope | dossier claim reported-force-scope | |
| cs-britton-1600 | C | 1,600 | unknown | adversary_or_hearsay_estimate | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
Dossier claims
Draft dossier, revision indian-territory-1863-review-correction-2026-09-25. Claims are extraction records with their quoted passages, not historical adjudication. JSON
information
supportedunresolved Williams says it was known that a large force had been concentrated to attack the train, and he took the enemy's strength from prisoners. Britton says prisoners taken by Parsons's Cherokees gave Watie's position and strength and Cabell's inability to cross, and that Indian women had earlier brought word of Cabell to Fort Gibson. NPS says Williams learned Watie intended to attack him at the crossing.
Attributed knowledge from an interested report, a history and a summary; no original messages inspected.
it was known that a large force of the enemy had been concentrated with this view.or22-1-williams-cabin-creek-selections-v1, p.380 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
7be9ec6b674c…Information was obtained from these prisoners that Colonel Watie was in command of the expedition sent out by General Cooper,britton-indian-territory-1863-selections-v1, p.95 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
8c95dace0b2e…several Indian women mounted their ponies and hastened to Fort Gibsonbritton-indian-territory-1863-selections-v1, p.93 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
8c95dace0b2e…logistics
supportedunresolved The action was fought to pass a supply train to Fort Gibson. Britton says Phillips's command was on short rations and then a diet of fresh beef, salt, rice and wheat before the train arrived, and that the train was corralled on the prairie a mile or so back from the ford; Williams puts it about 2 miles from the ford. NPS says the train delivered its supplies to Fort Gibson.
Train movements from an interested report, a history and a summary; no quartermaster record inspected.
a few days afterwards the ration was reduced to fresh beef, salt, rice, and wheat,britton-indian-territory-1863-selections-v1, p.94 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
8c95dace0b2e…the train was corralled on the prairie a mile or so back from the ford,britton-indian-territory-1863-selections-v1, p.96 (the running head for p.96 reads "g6" in OCR; OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
8c95dace0b2e…which had been corraled upon the prairie, about 2 miles from the ford.or22-1-williams-cabin-creek-selections-v1, p.380 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
7be9ec6b674c…The wagon train continued to Fort Gibson and delivered the supplies,nps-ok006-v1, Description · snapshot
f24aef9d421f…objectives
supportedunresolved Britton says Watie meant to attack the escort and train while crossing and, once the Federals came to fight, to hold them until Cabell could join. Williams says the prime object was to conduct the train, so he did not delay to pursue. NPS says Watie was waiting for Cabell before attacking the train.
Stated aims from a history, an interested report and a summary.
his plan was to attack the escort and train while crossing the creek,britton-indian-territory-1863-selections-v1, p.96 (the running head for p.96 reads "g6" in OCR; OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
8c95dace0b2e…he then desired to hold the Federal forces until he could get the assistance of General Cabell,britton-indian-territory-1863-selections-v1, p.97 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
8c95dace0b2e…But as the prime object was to conduct the supply train to your command, it was not deemed proper to cause any delay in pursuing the enemy ;or22-1-williams-cabin-creek-selections-v1, p.381 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
7be9ec6b674c…Watie was waiting for about 1,500 reinforcements under the command of Brig. Gen. William L. Cabell to join him before attacking the supply train.nps-ok006-v1, Description · snapshot
f24aef9d421f…outcome
supportedpost_outcome The frozen result reads Union victory and the live result Union Victory. Williams says the cavalry charge broke the enemy's centre and put him to flight, pursued for 5 miles, and the train reached Fort Blunt on the 5th; Britton gives the same outcome.
Retain the original result and engagement interval; later movements and campaign contribution are different measures. No new probabilities or individual causal credit.
charged directly upon the center of the enemy’s line, broke it, and put him to flight.or22-1-williams-cabin-creek-selections-v1, p.381 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
7be9ec6b674c…arriving at Fort Blunt on the 5th instant without any further interruption.or22-1-williams-cabin-creek-selections-v1, p.381 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
7be9ec6b674c…the train at once moved out and arrived at Fort Gibson without any further trouble.britton-indian-territory-1863-selections-v1, p.100 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
8c95dace0b2e…disputedpost_outcome The frozen casualty text reads 88 total (US 23; CS 65); the live field reads 80 (US 21; CS 59). Williams gives his loss as 1 killed and about 20 wounded, and estimates the enemy's at not less than 50 killed, as many wounded and 9 prisoners. Britton gives the official Federal loss as three killed and thirty wounded, and Williams's Confederate estimate as about fifty killed and nine prisoners.
Original casualty returns were not inspected; preserve totals, categories, cutoffs and differences. No canonical reconciliation or casualty-based opening count; related actions must not be added without resolving population overlap. Williams's Confederate figures are an estimate.
88 total (US 23; CS 65)arnold-cwsac-battles, battle OK006; column casualties_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…My whole loss in this engagement was 1 killed and about 20 wounded,or22-1-williams-cabin-creek-selections-v1, p.381 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
7be9ec6b674c…I think it will not fall short of 50 killed, as many more wounded, and 9 prisoners.or22-1-williams-cabin-creek-selections-v1, p.381 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
7be9ec6b674c…The Federal loss, according to the official reports, was three men killed and thirty wounded.britton-indian-territory-1863-selections-v1, p.100 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
8c95dace0b2e…the Confederate loss was about fifty men killed and nine prisoners.britton-indian-territory-1863-selections-v1, p.100 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
8c95dace0b2e…responsibility
supportedunresolved Williams, accompanying the train, laid the plan of attack after consulting Dodd, who commanded the escort, and Foreman; Britton calls him the ranking officer present. Britton says Watie seems to have made very little effort to rally his men after the line broke. The frozen commanders are Colonel Stand Watie and Colonel James M. Williams.
Command roles from an interested report and a history; the listed commanders do not receive automatic sole credit.
I laid the plan of attack as follows,or22-1-williams-cabin-creek-selections-v1, p.380 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
7be9ec6b674c…Lieutenant-Colonel [Theodore H.] Dodd, commanding escort to the train,or22-1-williams-cabin-creek-selections-v1, p.380 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
7be9ec6b674c…Colonel Williams, the ranking officer present,britton-indian-territory-1863-selections-v1, p.96 (the running head for p.96 reads "g6" in OCR; OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
8c95dace0b2e…Colonel Watie seems to have made very little effort to rally his men,britton-indian-territory-1863-selections-v1, p.100 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
8c95dace0b2e…Colonelarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle OK006, belligerent Confederate, fullname Stand Watie; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Colonelarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle OK006, belligerent US, fullname James M. Williams; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…strength
unknownunresolved
No inspected return establishes matched personnel at a common opening boundary. Imported numerical estimates remain unchanged; this pass does not validate them as simultaneous opening forces.
disputedunresolved The frozen force field reads Detachments from nine units [US] and two regiments and detachments from two other units (approx. 1,600-1,800) [CS]; the frozen CS bounds are both 1,600. The live field reads 1500 (US 0; CS 1500), while the live description gives Watie about 1,600 to 1,800 and Cabell about 1,500 reinforcements. Williams says prisoners put the enemy at 1,600 to 1,800, naming Watie's and McIntosh's regiments and 600 men of two Texas regiments (a compiler's note says the Twenty-seventh Texas was then in Mississippi), and that his attacking column was less than 900 men. Britton gives Watie about sixteen hundred, Cabell about fifteen hundred with three guns (unable to cross), and Foreman's reinforcement of six hundred mounted men.
A prisoners' estimate, an attacking-column figure and a history's figures; the frozen upper bound does not match its own text. None is adopted as a matched opening strength. The live US zero is not measured absence.
Detachments from nine units [US]; two regiments and detachments from two other units (approx. 1,600-1,800) [CS]arnold-cwsac-battles, battle OK006; column forces_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…1600arnold-cwsac-forces, battle OK006, belligerent Confederate; column strength_max · snapshot
a462f6be964b…The strength of the enemy, as near as can be ascertained from the prisoners, was from 1,600 to 1,800,or22-1-williams-cabin-creek-selections-v1, p.381 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
7be9ec6b674c…with detachment- of 600 men from the Twenty-seventh [Fifth Texas Partisan Rangers*] and Twenty-ninth Texas [Cavalry] Regiments.or22-1-williams-cabin-creek-selections-v1, p.381 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
7be9ec6b674c…The Twenty-seventh Texas was in Mississippi at this time.or22-1-williams-cabin-creek-selections-v1, p.381 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
7be9ec6b674c…My column of attack, which crossed the stream, was less than 900 men, all told.or22-1-williams-cabin-creek-selections-v1, p.381 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
7be9ec6b674c…his force of about sixteen hundred men consisted of two Indian regiments and parts of two Texas regiments;britton-indian-territory-1863-selections-v1, p.95 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
8c95dace0b2e…with about fifteen hundred men and three pieces of artillery,britton-indian-territory-1863-selections-v1, p.93 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
8c95dace0b2e…six hundred men, all that he could mount, and one howitzer,britton-indian-territory-1863-selections-v1, p.94 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
8c95dace0b2e…terrain
Open questions
- Phillips's report (No. 1, read in part and not selected) and Foreman's report (No. 3), any Confederate report of Watie or Wells, and the return of casualties mentioned by Phillips remain deferred.
- NPS/CWSAC is one family. Wiley Britton's The Civil War on the Border, volume II (Putnam's, 1899) is a retrospective history described on its title page as based upon official reports and the author's observations; it relays figures from Union and Confederate reports, so it is not independent of the Official Records families, and is treated as partly a participant's interested Union account. Williams's July 1863 report on Cabin Creek, Cooper's August 12, 1863 report on Elk Creek (Honey Springs) and Cabell's December 7, 1863 report including Backbone Mountain are separate author families of interested accounts; Cooper's inclosed general orders are part of his report. Official Records Series I, Volume XXII, Part 1 is a shared container, not an additional witness. Report dates are not event times or proof of contemporary knowledge.
- No automatic commander attribution, causal campaign score, morale/readiness number or battle/campaign double counting.