Charleston Harbor SC004
1863-04-07 to 1863-04-07 · SC · Operations Against the Defenses of Charleston [April-September 1863] · frozen result: Confederate · NPS summary (as listed)
In April, Maj. Gen. David Hunter prepared his land forces on Folly, Cole's, and North Edisto Islands to cooperate with a naval bombardment of Fort Sumter. On April 7, the South Atlantic Squadron under Rear Admiral S.F. Du Pont bombarded Fort Sumter, having little impact on the Confederate defenses of Charleston Harbor. Although several of Hunter's units had embarked on transports, the infantry were not landed, and the joint operation was abandoned. The ironclad warships Keokuk, Weehawken, Passaic, Montauk, Patapsco, New Ironsides, Catskill, Nantucket, and Nahant participated in the bombardment. Keokuk, struck more than 90 times by the accurate Confederate fire, sunk the next day.
Command responsibility (ledger v2)
US: S. F. Du Pont
Grade A under rule 2; echelon flotilla.
Du Pont's reports state that he attacked with the ironclads from the flagship, signalled them forward and withdrew them, and decided not to renew the attack. Hunter's land forces were not landed (description; Beauregard) and are not listed (rule 2, grade A).
Rear Admiralarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle SC004, belligerent US, fullname S. F. Du Pont; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…I yesterday moved up with eight ironclads and this ship and attacked Fort Sumter,orn14-dupont-charleston-harbor-selections-v1 · snapshot
0c413118bcde…I made signal to the vessels to weigh anchor,orn14-dupont-charleston-harbor-selections-v1 · snapshot
0c413118bcde…the South Atlantic Squadron under Rear Admiral S.F. Du Pont bombarded Fort Sumterarnold-cwsac-battles, battle SC004; column description · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Confederate: Ripley
Grade C under rule 2; echelon detachment_or_post. responsibility_unresolved
Other candidates: P.G.T. Beauregard
Beauregard, commanding the department, credits Ripley, 'commanding the First Military District, and especially charged with the defense of the harbor', and his subordinate commanders with the defense of April 7; his October 15 report names Ripley ('E. S. Eipley' in OCR), Butler and Rhett ('Bliett') as commanding 'at that period respectively in this military district the batteries on Sullivan's Island and Fort Sumter'. That names Ripley as commanding the engaged harbor works, contradicting the single listing of Beauregard (rule 2, third bullet): Ripley, grade C, with Beauregard as candidate. Beauregard's precautions concentrated troops 'for the defense of the several land approaches to the position', and the Union land forces 'made no attempt to co-operate actually with the naval attack'. No inspected passage shows him directing the April 7 harbor engagement, so superior_directing is not recorded (as at SC005). The live page gives Beauregard as Brigadier General; not adopted. Echelon: Ripley's district command of the harbor works is recorded as detachment_or_post.
Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle SC004, belligerent Confederate, fullname P.G.T. Beauregard; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Brigadier-General Ripley, com- manding the First Military District, and especially charged with the de- fense of the harbor,or14-beauregard-charleston-harbor-selections-v1 · snapshot
4586b6409c14…Brig. Gen. E. S. Eipley, Col. William Butler, and Col. Alfred Bliett, who commanded at that period respect- ively in this military district the batteries on Sullivan’s Island and Fort Sumteror14-beauregard-charleston-harbor-selections-v1 · snapshot
4586b6409c14…Side strength (ledger v3)
US: grade C, 1,200 (840–1,560)
applicability_unresolvedsingle_inputwhole_engagement_leakage
| Input | Class | Printed | Basis | Bound | Codes | Passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| us-dupont-1200 | C | 1,200 | unknown | scope_unresolved | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
Confederate: grade D: no usable figure (modelled in the rating runs)
whole_engagement_leakage
Dossier claims
Draft dossier, revision charleston-1863-review-correction-2026-09-25. Claims are extraction records with their quoted passages, not historical adjudication. JSON
information
supportedunresolved Beauregard says the accumulation of Union troops and ironclads at Port Royal and in the Edisto and Stono had convinced him the attack was imminent. Du Pont says buoys strewn in the channel raised suspicion of torpedoes, one of which burst near the Weehawken, and that the army could give him no cooperation.
Contemporary perceptions stated by the two commanders. No original reconnaissance, order or message chain was inspected to establish contemporary knowledge. Surprise in a summary does not independently establish what each commander knew.
having convinced me that the long-threatened attack on Charleston was immediately im- pending,or14-beauregard-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.241 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
4586b6409c14…causing a suspicion of torpedoes, one of which burst near the Weehawken ,orn14-dupont-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.6 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0c413118bcde…and the army could give me no cooperation.orn14-dupont-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.3 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0c413118bcde…logistics
supportedunresolved Du Pont counts only 139 shot and shell fired by his vessels and says five of the eight ironclads were wholly or partially disabled, chiefly in their guns; Beauregard, citing Union statements, gives 151 fleet shots against 2,209 from the forts, 520 of which struck, and credits Yates's traversing device with keeping guns trained with five men.
Ammunition expenditure and battle damage, not supply returns; Beauregard's fleet figures are copied from Union journals.
it appears that only 139 shot and shell were fired by our vessels,orn14-dupont-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.7 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0c413118bcde…but five of the eight ironclads were wholly or partially disabled after a brief engagement.orn14-dupont-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.3 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0c413118bcde…I mean in their armament or power of inflicting injury by their guns.orn14-dupont-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.6 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0c413118bcde…According to the enemy’s statements the fleet fired 151 shots;or14-beauregard-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.242 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
4586b6409c14…making the total number of shots fired 2,209, of which the enemy report that 520 struck the different vessels ;or14-beauregard-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.242 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
4586b6409c14…with but 5 men at the heaviest pieces.or14-beauregard-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.242 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
4586b6409c14…objectives
supportedunresolved Du Pont intended to pass Sumter and engage its northwest face, then proceed to the city; Beauregard says the fleet was driven back before reaching the lines of torpedoes and obstructions and that the heaviest batteries were not engaged.
Stated intent and the defender's account of how far the fleet came.
intending to pass it and commence action on its northwest face, in accordance with my order of battle.orn14-dupont-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.3 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0c413118bcde…intending to proceed the same day to the attack of Fort Sumter and thence the city of Charleston;orn14-dupont-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.5 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0c413118bcde…were baffled and driven back before reach- ing our lines of torpedoes and obstructions,or14-beauregard-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.242 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
4586b6409c14…outcome
supportedpost_outcome The frozen result reads Confederate victory (Warships were repulsed.); the live result Confederate Victory. Du Pont made the signal to withdraw at 4:30 (Beauregard says the remaining monitors kept up their fire until 5.25 p.m.), did not renew the attack and wrote that Charleston could not be taken by a purely naval attack; the Keokuk sank the next morning. Beauregard says Sumter could resist another such attack when the fleet left.
Retain the original result and engagement interval; later movements and campaign contribution are different measures. No new probabilities or individual causal credit.
Confederate victory (Warships were repulsed.)arnold-cwsac-battles, battle SC004; column results_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…at 4:30 I made signal to withdraw from action,orn14-dupont-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.6 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0c413118bcde…maintained their fire until 5.25 p. m.,or14-beauregard-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.241 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
4586b6409c14…Charleston can not be taken by a purely naval attack,orn14-dupont-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.3 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0c413118bcde…whose vessel sank this morning from the effect of the bombardment yesterdayorn14-dupont-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.3 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0c413118bcde…the work was capable of resist- ing as formidable an attack as the one it had just foiled.or14-beauregard-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.242 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
4586b6409c14…supportedpost_outcome The frozen casualty text and the live page read 36 total (US 22; CS 14). Beauregard calls the Confederate casualties slight and refers to subordinate reports; in October he says no life may have been lost on the ironclads but bloody clothes were found in the Keokuk.
Original casualty returns were not inspected; preserve totals, categories, cutoffs and differences. No canonical reconciliation or casualty-based opening count; related actions must not be added without resolving population overlap. The Keokuk and Nahant casualty lists printed with Du Pont's report were read but not selected.
36 total (US 22; CS 14)arnold-cwsac-battles, battle SC004; column casualties_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…For the casualties of the day, so slight, I must refer you to the reports herewith.or14-beauregard-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.242 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
4586b6409c14…a quantity of bloody clothes and blankets were found on board.or14-beauregard-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.245 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
4586b6409c14…responsibility
supportedunresolved Du Pont says he decided without consultation not to renew the attack after hearing the monitor captains' reports. Beauregard credits Ripley, commanding the First Military District and charged with the harbor defense, and says the Union land forces did not co-operate. The frozen commanders are Rear Admiral S. F. Du Pont (US) and General P. G. T. Beauregard (CS); the live page gives Beauregard as Brigadier General.
Command roles from the two commanders' reports; neither listed commander receives automatic sole credit, and the live rank is not adopted.
when, without hesitation or consultation (for I never hold councils of war), I determined not to renew the attack,orn14-dupont-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.3 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0c413118bcde…Brigadier-General Ripley, com- manding the First Military District, and especially charged with the de- fense of the harbor,or14-beauregard-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.242 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
4586b6409c14…made no attempt to co-operate actually with the naval attack.or14-beauregard-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.243 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
4586b6409c14…Rear Admiralarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle SC004, belligerent US, fullname S. F. Du Pont; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle SC004, belligerent Confederate, fullname P.G.T. Beauregard; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…strength
unknownunresolved
No inspected return establishes matched personnel at a common opening boundary. The frozen side-specific numerical strength bounds are blank (missing_numeric_strength). No figure in this pass is adopted as a simultaneous opening force.
supportedunresolved The frozen force text reads 9 warships; the live field reads zero. Du Pont attacked with eight ironclads and his flagship and says that, had he entered the harbor, he would have had 1,200 men and 32 guns; a reserve of wooden vessels was not engaged. Beauregard lists seven monitors, the Keokuk and the New Ironsides carrying thirty-two guns, and says seventy-six Confederate guns, including nine mortars and fifteen smooth-bore 32-pounders, were brought to bear on the fleet.
Vessel and gun counts that agree on nine vessels and 32 guns; no garrison strength. None is adopted as a matched opening strength. The live zero is not measured absence.
I yesterday moved up with eight ironclads and this ship and attacked Fort Sumter,orn14-dupont-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.3 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0c413118bcde…Had I succeeded in entering the harbor I should have had 1,200 men and 32 guns,orn14-dupont-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.3 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0c413118bcde…but their services in the engagement were not called into action.orn14-dupont-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.8 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0c413118bcde…seven single-turreted monitors,or14-beauregard-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.241 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
4586b6409c14…On our side seventy-six guns of various calibers, including nine mortars and fifteen smooth-bore 32-pounders, were brought to bear on the fleet, which car- ried thirty-two gunsor14-beauregard-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.241 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
4586b6409c14…terrain
disputedunresolved Du Pont says obstructions marked by rows of casks stretched from Moultrie to Sumter, that the narrow channel and current made his flagship partly unmanageable at 1,000 yards, and that the monitors and Keokuk reached 550 to 800 yards from Sumter. Beauregard says the Keokuk came no nearer than 900 yards, the New Ironsides was struck at 1,700 yards from Sumter and could not stand the fire at the range of a mile, and the monitors were disabled at not less than 1,300 yards, and in October that no ironclad passed nearer than 1,100 to 1,300 yards of the outer batteries except the Keokuk.
The two commanders' ranges differ; no chart inspected. The obstructions and forts predate the attack.
They extended across the harbor from Fort Moultrie to Fort Sumter, and were marked by rows of casks very near together and in several lines.orn14-dupont-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.6 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0c413118bcde…Owing to the narrow channel and rapid current she became partly unmanageable,orn14-dupont-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.3 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0c413118bcde…She could not get nearer than 1,000 yards.orn14-dupont-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.3 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0c413118bcde…at distances varying from 550 to 800 yards,orn14-dupont-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.6 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
0c413118bcde…The Keokuk did not come nearer than 900 yards of Fort Sumter;or14-beauregard-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.242 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
4586b6409c14…The New Ironsides, at the distance of 1,700 yards from Fort Sumter, was frequently struck,or14-beauregard-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.241 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
4586b6409c14…The New Ironsides could not stand the fire at the range of a mile;or14-beauregard-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.242 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
4586b6409c14…four of her consorts (monitors) were disabled at the distance of not less than 1,300 yards.or14-beauregard-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.242 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
4586b6409c14…never approached nearer than from 1,100 to 1,300 yards of the outer batteries,or14-beauregard-charleston-harbor-selections-v1, p.244 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
4586b6409c14…Open questions
- The ironclad captains' reports, the Keokuk and Nahant casualty lists, Ripley's, Rhett's and the other Confederate subordinate reports, Hunter's land-force papers and Samuel Jones's chapter IX remain deferred.
- NPS/CWSAC (NPS battle page and frozen Arnold rows) is one family. Samuel F. Du Pont's April 8 and 16, 1863 reports (Official Records of the Navies I, 14) and G. T. Beauregard's May 19 and October 15, 1863 reports (Official Records I, XIV) are interested accounts by the opposing commanders; Beauregard's fleet figures are taken from Union statements. Official Records volumes are shared containers, not additional witnesses. Report dates are not event times or proof of contemporary knowledge.
- No automatic commander attribution, causal campaign score, morale/readiness number or battle/campaign double counting.