Jackson TN009
1862-12-19 to 1862-12-19 · TN · Forrest's Expedition into West Tennessee [December 1862-January 1863] · frozen result: Confederate · NPS summary (as listed)
The engagement at Jackson occurred during Brig. Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest's Expedition into West Tennessee, between December 11, 1862, and January 1, 1863. Forrest wished to interrupt the rail supply line to Maj. Gen. Ulysses S. Grant's army, campaigning down the Mississippi Central Railroad. If he could destroy the Mobile & Ohio Railroad running south from Columbus, Kentucky, through Jackson, Grant would have to curtail or halt his operations. Forrest's 2,100-man cavalry brigade crossed the Tennessee River on December 15-17, heading west. Maj. Gen. Grant ordered a troop concentration at Jackson under Brig. Gen. Jeremiah C. Sullivan and sent a cavalry force out under Col. Robert G. Ingersoll, to confront Forrest. Forrest, however, smashed the Union cavalry at Lexington on December 18. As Forrest continued his advance the next day, Sullivan ordered Col. Adolph Englemann to take a small force northeast of Jackson. At Old Salem Cemetery, acting on the defensive, Englemann's two infantry regiments repulsed a Confederate mounted attack and then withdrew a mile closer to town. To Forrest, the fight amounted to no more than a feint and show of force intended to hold Jackson's Union defenders in place while two mounted columns destroyed railroad track north and south of the town and returned. This accomplished, Forrest withdrew from the Jackson area to attack Trenton and Humboldt. Thus, although the Federals had checked a demonstration by a portion of Forrest's force, a major accomplishment, other Confederates had fulfilled an element of the expedition's mission.
Command responsibility (ledger v2)
US: Adolph Englemann
Grade A under rule 2; echelon detachment_or_post. superior_directing
NPS says Sullivan ordered Englemann to take a small force northeast of Jackson (superior_directing: Sullivan).
Colonelarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle TN009, belligerent US, fullname Adolph Englemann; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Sullivan ordered Col. Adolph Englemann to take a small force northeast of Jackson.nps-tn009-v1 · snapshot
5c47c999f421…Confederate: Nathan Bedford Forrest
Grade A under rule 2; echelon brigade.
A cited passage states the command.
Brigadier Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle TN009, belligerent Confederate, fullname Nathan Bedford Forrest; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Forrest's 2,100-man cavalry brigade crossed the Tennessee Riverarnold-cwsac-battles, battle TN009; column description · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Side strength (ledger v3)
US: grade D: no usable figure (modelled in the rating runs)
whole_engagement_leakage
Confederate: grade A, 400 (380–2,210)
applicability_unresolvedcompiled_dependencederivation_unknownwhole_engagement_leakage
| Input | Class | Printed | Basis | Bound | Codes | Passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cs-cw | A | 400 | reported_engaged | derivation_unknown | 400arnold-cwsac-forces, battle TN009, belligerent Confederate; column description · snapshot a462f6be964b… | |
| cs-nps-brigade | C | 2,100 | unknown | scope_unresolved | dossier claim reported-force-scope | |
| cs-jp-outset | C | 1,800 | unknown | engagement_link_unknown | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
Dossier claims
Draft dossier, revision forrest-west-tennessee-review-correction-2026-09-25. Claims are extraction records with their quoted passages, not historical adjudication. JSON
information
supportedcommander_created Jordan and Pryor say Forrest disposed his force near Jackson to deceive the Federals about his numbers, displayed cavalry ostentatiously, and later had captured drums beaten to suggest infantry; NPS says Forrest treated the fight as a feint and show of force.
Attributed deception by the Confederate commander, from a history he endorsed; its effect on Union knowledge is not established.
disposed his force with a view to deceive them in re- gard to his numbers.jordan-west-tennessee-selections-v1, p.198 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3f583c0aa133…with the object of deceiv- ing as to the actual force investing the place.jordan-west-tennessee-selections-v1, p.198 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3f583c0aa133…he caused a number of drums to be beaten in such manner as to produce the belief of a heavy infantry forcejordan-west-tennessee-selections-v1, p.199 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3f583c0aa133…the fight amounted to no more than a feint and show of forcenps-tn009-v1, Description · snapshot
5c47c999f421…logistics
supportedunresolved Jordan and Pryor say Forrest set out with only ten rounds of caps for his shot-guns and many flintless muskets, and that arms captured near Jackson were distributed in place of inferior ones.
Combines an outset condition (inherited at any Jackson boundary) with arms captured by detachments Forrest ordered out the night before the December 19 skirmish and distributed on their return; Jordan and Pryor place his arrival and first skirmishing at Jackson on the afternoon of December 18. With replacement boundaries unset, the captured-arms part may be inherited or commander-created. From the commander-endorsed history; no ordnance return inspected.
only ten rounds of caps for his shot-guns, while many of the muskets vftvQ Jlintless.jordan-west-tennessee-selections-v1, p.194 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3f583c0aa133…thus happily acquired were imrne- f distributed in lieu of those of inferior speciesjordan-west-tennessee-selections-v1, p.197 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3f583c0aa133…objectives
supportedunresolved NPS says Forrest wished to interrupt Grant's rail supply line and that, to Forrest, the Jackson fight was a feint to hold the defenders in place while two mounted columns destroyed track north and south of the town. Jordan and Pryor say detachments sent out at eight o'clock the previous night broke the railroad, captured stations and returned about daylight, before the sunrise skirmish.
Stated objectives from a summary and a commander-endorsed history; no inspected order. Both describe railroad destruction, but NPS makes the raids concurrent with the fight while Jordan and Pryor place them on the night of December 18–19, before it. The sequence is unresolved and no holding effect is established.
Forrest wished to interrupt the rail supply line to Maj. Gen. Ulysses S. Grant's armynps-tn009-v1, Description · snapshot
5c47c999f421…To Forrest, the fight amounted to no more than a feint and show of force intended to hold Jackson's Union defenders in placenps-tn009-v1, Description · snapshot
5c47c999f421…break up the intermediate sections of the roadjordan-west-tennessee-selections-v1, p.197 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3f583c0aa133…while two mounted columns destroyed railroad track north and south of the townnps-tn009-v1, Description · snapshot
5c47c999f421…at eight o'clock at night, de- tached Colonel Dibrelljordan-west-tennessee-selections-v1, p.196 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3f583c0aa133…to their positions about daylight with their capturesjordan-west-tennessee-selections-v1, p.197 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3f583c0aa133…About sunrise the enemy threw forward a strong line of skirmishersjordan-west-tennessee-selections-v1, p.198 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3f583c0aa133…outcome
disputedpost_outcome The frozen result is Confederate victory, as is the live field. NPS says Englemann's regiments repulsed a Confederate mounted attack and that the Federals checked a demonstration while other Confederates fulfilled part of the mission; Jordan and Pryor say the Federals were driven to their entrenchments.
Retain the original result and engagement interval; later movements and campaign contribution are different measures. No new probabilities or individual causal credit. The sources describe the local fight differently; the frozen label is retained.
Englemann's two infantry regiments repulsed a Confederate mounted attacknps-tn009-v1, Description · snapshot
5c47c999f421…other Confederates had fulfilled an element of the expedition's missionnps-tn009-v1, Description · snapshot
5c47c999f421…the enemy was speedily driven to his intrenchmentsjordan-west-tennessee-selections-v1, p.198 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3f583c0aa133…disputedpost_outcome The frozen casualty text reads Total unknown (US 6; CS unknown); the live NPS field reads 6 total (US 6; CS 0;). Jordan and Pryor claim a Federal loss of about thirty killed and wounded in the December 19 skirmish, and about five hundred prisoners from the several combats around Jackson.
Original casualty returns were not inspected; preserve totals, categories, cutoffs and differences. No canonical reconciliation or casualty-based opening count; related actions must not be added without resolving population overlap. The live CS zero replaces a frozen 'unknown' and is not measured absence; the prisoner figure spans several actions.
Total unknown (US 6; CS unknown)arnold-cwsac-battles, battle TN009; column casualties_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…with a loss of about thirty (30) killed and woundedjordan-west-tennessee-selections-v1, p.198 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3f583c0aa133…with some five hundred prisoners taken in the several combats and surprises around Jacksonjordan-west-tennessee-selections-v1, p.199 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3f583c0aa133…responsibility
supportedunresolved NPS says Sullivan ordered Englemann out with a small force, and names Englemann's two infantry regiments. The live heading ranks Forrest Major General against the frozen Brigadier General, which the NPS narrative also uses.
Garrison and field command are distinct; neither listed commander receives automatic sole credit. The heading rank is not adopted.
Sullivan ordered Col. Adolph Englemann to take a small force northeast of Jackson.nps-tn009-v1, Description · snapshot
5c47c999f421…Brigadier Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle TN009, belligerent Confederate, fullname Nathan Bedford Forrest; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…strength
unknownunresolved
No inspected return establishes matched personnel at a common opening boundary. Imported numerical estimates remain unchanged; this pass does not validate them as simultaneous opening forces.
disputedunresolved The frozen force text names two regiments of the Jackson garrison and a detachment of Forrest's cavalry of approx. 400, with structured Confederate bounds of 400/400; the live field reads zero. NPS gives Forrest's whole brigade as 2,100 men; Jordan and Pryor give about 1,800 officers and men and four guns at the outset.
Detachment, brigade and outset figures are different populations; the brigade figures differ between the sources. None is adopted as matched opening strength. Live zeros are not measured absence.
Two regiments from the Jackson Garrison [US]; Detachment of Forrest's Cavalry (approx. 400) [CS]arnold-cwsac-battles, battle TN009; column forces_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…400arnold-cwsac-forces, battle TN009, belligerent Confederate; column strength_min · snapshot
a462f6be964b…400arnold-cwsac-forces, battle TN009, belligerent Confederate; column strength_max · snapshot
a462f6be964b…about eighteen hundred officers and men and four gunsjordan-west-tennessee-selections-v1, p.194 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3f583c0aa133…terrain
supportedinherited Jordan and Pryor describe Jackson's works as a heavy line of infantry epaulements connecting five or six open-gorge works for field-pieces commanding the approaches; NPS places the December 19 fight at Old Salem Cemetery.
Pre-existing works from a Confederate retrospective account; no map verification or numerical terrain effect.
a heavy line of infantry epaulements connecting some five or six open-gorge works for field-pieces, that commanded all the approaches to the position.jordan-west-tennessee-selections-v1, p.196 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3f583c0aa133…Open questions
- Englemann's and Forrest's reports, returns and the division of losses among the actions around Jackson remain deferred.
- NPS/CWSAC is one family; Jordan and Pryor is one retrospective Confederate history written from Forrest's papers and notes, for most of whose statements Forrest's prefatory note accepts responsibility. It is not independent of the listed Confederate commander. Reports and newspapers quoted inside it are not additional families.
- No automatic commander attribution, causal campaign score, morale/readiness number or battle/campaign double counting.