Murfreesboro TN037
1864-12-05 to 1864-12-07 · TN · Franklin-Nashville Campaign [September-December 1864] · frozen result: Union · NPS summary (as listed)
In a last, desperate attempt to force Maj. Gen. William T. Sherman's army out of Georgia, Gen. John Bell Hood led the Army of Tennessee north toward Nashville in November 1864. Although he suffered a terrible loss at Franklin, he continued toward Nashville. In operating against Nashville, he decided that destruction of the Nashville & Chattanooga Railroad and disruption of the Union army supply depot at Murfreesboro would help his cause. He sent Maj. Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest, on December 4, with an expedition, composed of two cavalry divisions and Maj. Gen. William B. Bate's infantry division, to Murfreesboro. On December 2, Hood had ordered Bate to destroy the railroad and blockhouses between Murfreesboro and Nashville and join Forrest for further operations; on December 4, Bate's division attacked Blockhouse No. 7 protecting the railroad crossing at Overall Creek, but Union forces fought it off. On the morning of the 5th, Forrest headed out toward Murfreesboro, splitting his force, one column to attack the fort on the hill and the other to take Blockhouse No. 4, both at La Vergne. Upon his demand for surrender at both locations, the Union garrisons did so. Outside La Vergne, Forrest hooked up with Bate's division and the command advanced on to Murfreesboro along two roads, driving the Yankees into their Fortress Rosencrans fortifications, and encamped in the city outskirts for the night. The next morning, on the 6th, Forrest ordered Bate's division to "move upon the enemy's works." Fighting flared for a couple of hours, but the Yankees ceased firing and both sides glared at each other for the rest of the day. Brig. Gen. Claudius Sears's and Brig. Gen. Joseph B. Palmer's infantry brigades joined Forrest's command in the evening, further swelling his numbers. On the morning of the 7th, Maj. Gen. Lovell Rousseau, commanding all of the forces at Murfreesboro, sent two brigades out under Brig. Gen. Robert Milroy on the Salem Pike to feel out the enemy. These troops engaged the Confederates and fighting continued. At one point some of Forrest's troops broke and ran causing disorder in the Rebel ranks; even entreaties from Forrest and Bate did not stem the rout of these units. The rest of Forrest's command conducted an orderly retreat from the field and encamped for the night outside Murfreesboro. Forrest had destroyed railroad track, blockhouses, and some homes and generally disrupted Union operations in the area, but he did not accomplish much else. The raid on Murfreesboro was a minor irritation.
Command responsibility (ledger v2)
US: Lovell H. Rousseau
Grade A under rule 3a; echelon detachment_or_post.
Other candidates: Robert Milroy
Listed Major General (Rousseau) and Brigadier General (Milroy). Rule 3(a): the description has Rousseau 'commanding all of the forces at Murfreesboro', and his reports have him sending Milroy out and driving Buford from the town himself; Milroy led the sortie of the 7th (subordinate). Rousseau's report is headed 'commanding District of Tennessee'. The first combat of the interval (5th) included the La Vergne garrisons, whose blockhouse garrisons had orders from Captain Hake said to come from Thomas; no passage says who commanded them, and they are not treated as a separate command. Echelon: the Murfreesboro garrison.
Major Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle TN037, belligerent US, fullname Lovell H. Rousseau; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Brigadier Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle TN037, belligerent US, fullname Robert Milroy; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Maj. Gen. Lovell Rousseau, commanding all of the forces at Murfreesboro, sent two brigades out under Brig. Gen. Robert Milroy on the Salem Pike to feel out the enemy.arnold-cwsac-battles, battle TN037; column description · snapshot
952b5d08402a…I sent General Milroy, with seven regi¬ ments and a battery, on the Salem pikeor45-1-rousseau-murfreesborough-selections-v1 · snapshot
ea1ffc5f0279…Confederate: Nathan Bedford Forrest
Grade A under rule 2; echelon detachment_or_post. superior_directing
Rule 2. The description has Hood sending Forrest with the expedition, and Forrest splitting his force and advancing on the 5th; Bate's division fought under him (subordinate context; Bate's December 4 attack precedes the frozen interval). Hood ordered the expedition from before Nashville (superior_directing: Hood). Nothing contradicts the listing.
Major Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle TN037, belligerent Confederate, fullname Nathan Bedford Forrest; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…He sent Maj. Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest, on December 4, with an expedition, composed of two cavalry divisions and Maj. Gen. William B. Bate's infantry division, to Murfreesboro.arnold-cwsac-battles, battle TN037; column description · snapshot
952b5d08402a…On the morning of the 5th, Forrest headed out toward Murfreesboro, splitting his forcearnold-cwsac-battles, battle TN037; column description · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Side strength (ledger v3)
US: grade A, 8,000 (7,600–8,400)
compiled_dependencederivation_unknownsingle_inputwhole_engagement_leakage
| Input | Class | Printed | Basis | Bound | Codes | Passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| us-cw | A | 8,000 | reported_engaged | derivation_unknown | ||
| us-nps | A | 8,000 | reported_engaged | derivation_unknown | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
Confederate: grade A, 6,750 (6,410–7,090)
compiled_dependencederivation_unknownsingle_inputwhole_engagement_leakage
| Input | Class | Printed | Basis | Bound | Codes | Passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cs-cw | A | 6,500–7,000 | reported_engaged | derivation_unknown | 6,500-7,000arnold-cwsac-forces, battle TN037, belligerent Confederate; column description · snapshot a462f6be964b… | |
| cs-nps | A | 6,750 | reported_engaged | derivation_unknown | dossier claim reported-force-scope | |
| cs-rousseau-cav | bound | 2,500 | unknown | lower | adversary_or_hearsay_estimatepartial_scope | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
Dossier claims
Draft dossier, revision franklin-nashville-review-correction-2026-09-25. Claims are extraction records with their quoted passages, not historical adjudication. JSON
information
supportedunresolved Rousseau says he sent Milroy out on the 7th 'Not knowing where the main body of the enemy was'. Forrest says he reconnoitred the works on the 6th and on the 7th saw the enemy moving out in strong force on the Salem pike, and was satisfied he meant to give battle.
Attributed knowledge from interested reports.
Not knowing where the main body of the enemy was,or45-1-rousseau-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.613 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea1ffc5f0279…with which I made a careful reconnaissance of the enemy’s position and works.or45-1-forrest-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.755 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79307d0809aa…I discovered from the position occupied by Colonel Palmer the enemy moving out in strong force on the Salem pike,or45-1-forrest-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.755 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79307d0809aa…Being fully satisfied that his object was to make battle,or45-1-forrest-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.755 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79307d0809aa…logistics
supportedunresolved Rousseau writes on December 12 that the wires to Stevenson were down, that a train to Stevenson for supplies would carry his dispatch, and that he was subsisting off the country. NPS says Hood aimed at the railroad and the supply depot at Murfreesboro.
Supply statements from an interested dispatch; no commissary return inspected.
Railroad train to Stevenson for supplies will take tms dispatch to be forwarded.or45-1-rousseau-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.614 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea1ffc5f0279…I am subsisting off* the country, which I think I can do.or45-1-rousseau-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.614 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea1ffc5f0279…disruption of the Union army supply depot at Murfreesboro would help his cause.nps-tn037-v1, Description · snapshot
9397140f8c45…objectives
supportedunresolved Forrest says he received orders on the 4th to move on Murfreesborough and on the 6th ordered the infantry to move on the enemy's works. Rousseau sent Milroy to swing around and return along the woods west and northwest of the fortifications. NPS says Hood sought to destroy the Nashville and Chattanooga Railroad and disrupt the depot.
Stated orders from interested reports and a modern summary.
On the morning of the 4tli 1 received orders to move with Buford’s and Jackson’s divisions to Murfreesborough,or45-1-forrest-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.755 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79307d0809aa…I immediately ordered it in line of battle and to move upon the enemy’s works.or45-1-forrest-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.755 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79307d0809aa…with directions to swing around to right, returning parallel to the works along the line of the woods west and northwest of the fortifications.or45-1-rousseau-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.613 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea1ffc5f0279…he decided that destruction of the Nashville & Chattanooga Railroadnps-tn037-v1, Description · snapshot
9397140f8c45…outcome
disputedpost_outcome The frozen and live results read Union victory. Rousseau says the rout was complete; Forrest says his cavalry checked the Union advance, the infantry retired to Stewart's Creek, and when the enemy returned to Murfreesborough his cavalry resumed its former position. NPS calls the raid a minor irritation.
Retain the original result and engagement interval; later movements and campaign contribution are different measures. No new probabilities or individual causal credit. The commanders' characterizations conflict.
The rout was com¬ plete, infantry and cavalry running in every direction.or45-1-rousseau-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.614 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea1ffc5f0279…thereby checking his farther advance.or45-1-forrest-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.755 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79307d0809aa…X ordered my cavalry to resume its former position.or45-1-forrest-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.755 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79307d0809aa…disputedpost_outcome The frozen casualty text reads 422 (US 225; CS 197); the live field reads 422 (US 208; CS 214). Rousseau's December 8 dispatch gives the Wilkinson pike loss as about 30 killed and 175 wounded and 207 prisoners taken; his December 12 dispatch gives about 175 killed and wounded and 1 missing. For Buford's attack on the town he reports 30 enemy killed or wounded, 25 prisoners and one man of his own wounded. Forrest gives no count; he reports two guns lost.
Original casualty returns were not inspected; preserve totals, categories, cutoffs and differences. No canonical reconciliation or casualty-based opening count; related actions must not be added without resolving population overlap. Rousseau's two dispatches differ; the December 4 Overall's Creek losses (4 or 5 killed, 49 wounded) are outside the record.
422 total (US 225; CS 197)arnold-cwsac-battles, battle TN037; column casualties_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Our loss was about 30 killed and 175 wounded.or45-1-rousseau-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.613 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea1ffc5f0279…In this fight we captured 207 prisoners, including 18 commissioned officers.or45-1-rousseau-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.613 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea1ffc5f0279…on Wilkinson’s pike about 175 killed and wounded, 1 missing.or45-1-rousseau-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.614 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea1ffc5f0279…wounding and killing 30 and taking 25 prisoners.or45-1-rousseau-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.615 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea1ffc5f0279…We lost one man wounded.or45-1-rousseau-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.615 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea1ffc5f0279…Our loss in the affair was 4 killed and 49 wounded.or45-1-rousseau-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.613 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea1ffc5f0279…Our loss in the fight at Over¬ all’s Creek was 5 killed and 49 wounded,or45-1-rousseau-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.614 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea1ffc5f0279…responsibility
supportedunresolved Rousseau says he sent Milroy with seven regiments, that 'The fight was well conducted by Major-General Milroy', and that he himself drove Buford's cavalry out of the town with a regiment and a section. Forrest says the infantry except Smith's brigade made 'a shameful retreat', that he and Bate tried and failed to rally them, that Armstrong's and Ross's cavalry checked the advance, and that his order to Buford to protect his left never reached him. The frozen commanders are Major General Forrest (CS), Major General Rousseau and Brigadier General Milroy (US); Rousseau styles Milroy Major-General.
Direction is attributed as the reports state; Rousseau's style for Milroy is not adopted. No listed commander receives automatic sole credit.
The fight was well conducted by Major-General Milroy,or45-1-rousseau-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.614 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea1ffc5f0279…With a regiment of infantry tind a section of artillery I drove the enemy out of the town,or45-1-rousseau-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.613 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea1ffc5f0279…made a shameful retreat, losing two pieces of artillery.or45-1-forrest-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.755 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79307d0809aa…Major-General Bate did the same thing, but was equally as unsuccessful as myself.or45-1-forrest-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.755 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79307d0809aa…I ordered Brigadier-General Buford to protect my left flank, but he was so remote the order never reached him.or45-1-forrest-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.756 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79307d0809aa…Major Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle TN037, belligerent Confederate, fullname Nathan Bedford Forrest; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Major Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle TN037, belligerent US, fullname Lovell H. Rousseau; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Brigadier Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle TN037, belligerent US, fullname Robert Milroy; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…strength
unknownunresolved
No inspected return establishes matched personnel at a common opening boundary. Imported numerical estimates remain unchanged; this pass does not validate them as simultaneous opening forces.
disputedunresolved The frozen force text reads approx. 8,000 in the District of Tennessee against Forrest's cavalry, Bate's division and Sears's and Palmer's brigades, 6,500-7,000, while the frozen force table stores the Confederate bounds as 6,500 and 6,500; the live field reads 14,750 (US 8,000; CS 6,750). Rousseau's December 8 dispatch says the enemy was reinforced on the 5th by two brigades of infantry and 2,500 of Forrest's cavalry; his December 12 dispatch says 2,500 cavalry and two divisions of infantry. Rousseau sent Milroy out on the 7th with seven regiments and a battery. Forrest says he moved with Buford's and Jackson's divisions, leaving 250 men to picket, and was joined by Bate's division and, on the 6th, by Sears's and Palmer's brigades.
The frozen Confederate range in the force text (6,500-7,000) and the stored bounds (6,500-6,500) differ. Rousseau's two dispatches differ (brigades against divisions); no inspected passage gives Forrest's own numbers or the garrison's. None is adopted as a matched opening strength; the live figures are not adopted.
District of Tennessee (forces in Murfreesboro area; approx. 8,000) [US]arnold-cwsac-battles, battle TN037; column forces_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…6500arnold-cwsac-forces, battle TN037, belligerent Confederate; column strength_min · snapshot
a462f6be964b…6500arnold-cwsac-forces, battle TN037, belligerent Confederate; column strength_max · snapshot
a462f6be964b…the enemy were re-enforced by two brigades of infantry and 2,500 of Forrest’s cavalry,or45-1-rousseau-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.613 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea1ffc5f0279…He was re-enforced by Forrest with 2,500 cavalry and two divisions of infantry.or45-1-rousseau-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.614 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea1ffc5f0279…I sent General Milroy, with seven regi¬ ments and a battery,or45-1-rousseau-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.613 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea1ffc5f0279…to move with Buford’s and Jackson’s divisions to Murfreesborough, and to leave 250 men on the right to picketor45-1-forrest-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.755 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79307d0809aa…On the evening of the 6th I was re-enforced by Sears’ and Palmer’s brigades of infantry.or45-1-forrest-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.755 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79307d0809aa…terrain
supportedunresolved NPS says Forrest drove the garrison into the Fortress Rosecrans fortifications. Rousseau says Milroy found the enemy on the Wilkinson pike behind breastworks of logs and rails, near the Stones River battlefield. Forrest says he withdrew to the Wilkinson pike and formed a new line 'on a more favorable position'.
The fortress predates the operations; the log breastworks and the new Confederate line were made during them and are not inherited.
driving the Yankees into their Fortress Rosencrans fortifications,nps-tn037-v1, Description · snapshot
9397140f8c45…The enemy was encountered on the Wilkinson pike behind breast-works made of logs and rails,or45-1-rousseau-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.613 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea1ffc5f0279…being near where Negley’s command was formed at the battle of Stone’s River,or45-1-rousseau-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.613 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea1ffc5f0279…I withdrew my forces to the Wilkinson pike, and formed a new line on a more favorable position.or45-1-forrest-murfreesborough-selections-v1, p.755 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
79307d0809aa…Open questions
- Milroy's No. 209 report (read at its opening), the regimental reports Nos. 210–222, Bate's No. 251 report, Sears's and Palmer's reports, the District of Tennessee returns (No. 3), Cox's Murfreesboro passage (pp.100–104, in the Nashville section; not cited here) and Jordan and Pryor's account remain deferred.
- NPS/CWSAC (the live NPS page and the frozen Arnold rows) is one family. Jacob D. Cox's The March to the Sea; Franklin and Nashville (1882) is an interested history by the commander of the Twenty-third Corps' Third Division (and, at Franklin, of both divisions of that corps) that draws on official papers. Corse's, French's, R. S. Granger's, Doolittle's, Sinclair's, Forrest's, Hood's and Rousseau's reports, printed in Official Records Series I, Volumes XXXIX part 1 and XLV part 1, are separate families of interested accounts; each volume is a shared container, not an additional witness. Report dates are not event times or proof of contemporary knowledge.
- No automatic commander attribution, causal campaign score, morale/readiness number or battle/campaign double counting.