Suffolk VA030
1863-04-13 to 1863-04-15 · VA · Longstreet's Tidewater Operations [March-April 1863] · frozen result: Inconclusive · NPS summary (as listed)
In cooperation with D.H. Hill's advance on Washington, North Carolina, Lt. Gen. James Longstreet with Hood's and Pickett's divisions besieged the Union garrison at Suffolk commanded by Brig. Gen. John Peck. The Union works were formidable and manned by 25,000 men, opposed to Longstreet's 20,000. On April 13, the Confederate troops pushed their left flank to the Nansemond River and constructed a battery on Hill's Point, which closed off the garrison to Union shipping. On April 14, Union gunboats attempted to run the batteries at the Norfleet House slightly upstream, but Mount Washington was crippled. The Federals, at the same time, constructed batteries to command the Confederate works at Norfleet House. On April 15, these batteries were unmasked and opened fire, driving the Confederates out of this important position.
Dossier claims
Draft dossier, revision tidewater-review-correction-2026-09-25. Claims are extraction records with their quoted passages, not historical adjudication. JSON
information
supportedunresolved French says only one gunboat could be seen on the 15th. Peck gives the Confederate force near the West Branch as reported by the best authorities.
Observation and report attributions only; no inspected signal or message log.
Only one gunboat could be seen,or18-french-suffolk-selections-v1, p.324 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
1542f02cec7e…was reported by the best authorities at 10,000,or18-peck-suffolk-selections-v1, p.276 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
25e0ef6240be…logistics
supportedunresolved French says that on the 15th he took Stribling's, Bradford's and Coit's batteries to the river, and withdrew the guns when a storm came on and night approached. Peck reports the force near the West Branch 'with a pontoon train under the immediate command of General French', which leaves unclear whether French commanded the force or the train.
Equipment statements from two opposing reports; no ordnance or engineer record inspected.
On the morning of the 15th instant I started from my camp on the South Quay road,or18-french-suffolk-selections-v1, p.324 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
1542f02cec7e…Stribling’s, Bradford’s, and [J. 0.] Coit’s battenes were takenor18-french-suffolk-selections-v1, p.324 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
1542f02cec7e…storm coming on and the near approach of night induced me to withdu the guns.or18-french-suffolk-selections-v1, p.324 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
1542f02cec7e…with a pontoon train under the imine diate command of General French.or18-peck-suffolk-selections-v1, p.276 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
25e0ef6240be…objectives
supportedunresolved French says he went to the river on the 15th at Longstreet's request to try to destroy the Union gunboats in the Nansemond. Peck says the Norfleet battery was opened to destroy the gunboats and cover a crossing.
French reports his own orders; Peck's statement of purpose is an opponent's inference. No inspected orders.
to endeavor to destroy the gunboats of the enemy in the Nansemondor18-french-suffolk-selections-v1, p.324 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
1542f02cec7e…for the purpose of destroying the gunboats and of covering a crossing.or18-peck-suffolk-selections-v1, p.276 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
25e0ef6240be…outcome
supportedpost_outcome The frozen result reads Inconclusive and the live result Indecisive. NPS says the Mount Washington was crippled on April 14 and that on April 15 the Union batteries drove the Confederates out of the Norfleet House position. Peck says the Mount Washington was riddled, disabled and grounded, and that on the 15th four 20-pounder rifles were dismounted and the Norfleet battery silenced. French's report of the 15th does not mention that battery being silenced.
Retain the original result and engagement interval; later movements and campaign contribution are different measures. No new probabilities or individual causal credit. Whether French's and Peck's accounts of the 15th describe the same guns is not established.
On April 14, Union gunboats attempted to run the batteries at the Norfleet House slightly upstream, but Mount Washington was crippled.nps-va030-v1, Description · snapshot
1d0c1b2899be…On April 15, these batteries were unmasked and opened fire, driving the Confederates out of this important position.nps-va030-v1, Description · snapshot
1d0c1b2899be…The Mount Washington, completely riddled and disabled, grounded,or18-peck-suffolk-selections-v1, p.276 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
25e0ef6240be…About noon our batteries, undei the direction of General Getty, below the mouth of Jericho Creek, were warmly engaged with the Norfleet battery.or18-peck-suffolk-selections-v1, p.276 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
25e0ef6240be…Four of the rebel 20-pounder rifles were dismounted and the battery was silenced.or18-peck-suffolk-selections-v1, p.276 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
25e0ef6240be…supportedpost_outcome The frozen casualty text gives only (1,160 entire siege), shared with VA031, and no engagement count; the live NPS field reads zero. The inspected Peck and French passages give no count for April 13–15.
Original casualty returns were not inspected; preserve totals, categories, cutoffs and differences. No canonical reconciliation or casualty-based opening count; related actions must not be added without resolving population overlap. The siege total must not be assigned to this engagement or added to VA031's.
(1,160 entire siege)arnold-cwsac-battles, battle VA030; column casualties_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…responsibility
supportedunresolved Peck says Lieutenant Lamson's gunboats engaged the Norfleet battery on the 14th and that the Union batteries that engaged it on the 15th were under Getty's direction; French says he acted at Longstreet's request. The frozen and live ranks give Peck Brigadier General, while his report is signed Major-General; the live heading ranks Longstreet Major General against the frozen Lieutenant General.
Local execution by subordinates and naval officers; the frozen commanders Peck and Longstreet do not receive automatic sole credit. Neither heading nor signature rank is adopted.
Ijieutenant Lamson, with the Mount Washington, West End, and Step- ping Stones, engaged the^ batteryor18-peck-suffolk-selections-v1, p.276 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
25e0ef6240be…our batteries, undei the direction of General Getty,or18-peck-suffolk-selections-v1, p.276 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
25e0ef6240be…at the request of Lieutenant-General LongsU’ect,or18-french-suffolk-selections-v1, p.324 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
1542f02cec7e…Brigadier Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle VA030, belligerent US, fullname John Peck; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…JOHN J. PECK, Major- General.or18-peck-suffolk-selections-v1, p.280 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
25e0ef6240be…Lieutenant Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle VA030, belligerent Confederate, fullname James Longstreet; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…strength
unknownunresolved
No inspected return establishes matched personnel at a common opening boundary. The frozen side-specific numerical strength bounds are blank (missing_numeric_strength); the frozen battle-level 45,000 total is shared by VA030 and VA031 and its scope is not stated. No figure in this pass is adopted as a simultaneous opening force.
disputedunresolved The frozen force field reads Divisions (45,000 total), shared with VA031; the live field reads zero. NPS says the Union works were manned by 25,000 men against Longstreet's 20,000. Peck says 15,000 of Longstreet's corps were on the Blackwater and 15,000 between Petersburg and the river after late February, and that on the 15th the force between Suffolk and the West Branch was reported at 10,000.
Siege-level, pre-advance and sector figures differ in scope and source; none is adopted as a matched opening strength for April 13–15. Live zeros are not measured absence.
Divisions (45,000 total)arnold-cwsac-battles, battle VA030; column forces_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…The Union works were formidable and manned by 25,000 men, opposed to Longstreet's 20,000.nps-va030-v1, Description · snapshot
1d0c1b2899be…Of his corps, 15,000 were on the Black- water and 15,000 between Petersburg and the river,or18-peck-suffolk-selections-v1, p.275 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
25e0ef6240be…On the 15th the force between Suffolk and West Branch was reported by the best authorities at 10,000,or18-peck-suffolk-selections-v1, p.276 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
25e0ef6240be…terrain
supportedunresolved NPS says the Confederates pushed their left to the Nansemond on April 13 and built a battery on Hill's Point that closed the river to Union shipping, and that the Federals built batteries commanding the Confederate works at Norfleet House. Peck says the enemy opened a ten-gun battery near the Norfleet house.
Works built by both sides within or just before the interval; boundaries unset and no map verification.
the Confederate troops pushed their left flank to the Nansemond River and constructed a battery on Hill's Point, which closed off the garrison to Union shipping.nps-va030-v1, Description · snapshot
1d0c1b2899be…constructed batteries to command the Confederate works at Norfleet House.nps-va030-v1, Description · snapshot
1d0c1b2899be…The enemy opened a ten-gun battery near the Norfleet houseor18-peck-suffolk-selections-v1, p.276 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
25e0ef6240be…Open questions
- Longstreet's and Hood's reports, the navy reports of April 14 and Getty's report remain deferred; the engagement's own casualties are unknown.
- NPS/CWSAC is one family. Foster's, D. H. Hill's, Peck's and French's reports, printed in Official Records Series I, Volume XVIII, are separate families of interested commanders' accounts; the volume is a shared container, not an additional witness. The compiler's footnote is counted with the Foster selection, and Longstreet's indorsement with French's report, for the effort ceiling; neither is treated as independent corroboration. Report dates are not event times or proof of contemporary knowledge.
- No automatic commander attribution, causal campaign score, morale/readiness number or battle/campaign double counting.