Petersburg VA098
1864-06-09 to 1864-06-09 · VA · Richmond-Petersburg Campaign [June 1864-March 1865] · frozen result: Confederate · NPS summary (as listed)
On June 9, Maj. Gen. Benjamin Butler dispatched about 4,500 cavalry and infantry against the 2,500 Confederate defenders of Petersburg. While Butler's infantry demonstrated against the outer line of entrenchments east of Petersburg, Kautz's cavalry division attempted to enter the city from the south via the Jerusalem Plank Road but was repulsed by Home Guards. Afterwards, Butler withdrew. This was called the "battle of old men and young boys" by local residents. On June 14-17, the Army of the Potomac crossed the James River and began moving towards Petersburg to support and renew Butler's assaults.
Command responsibility (ledger v2)
US: Quincy A. Gillmore
Grade A under rule 2; echelon detachment_or_post. superior_directing
Single CWSAC listing. Humphreys gives Gillmore's infantry column (Hawley's and Hinks's troops) before the works at seven, and Gillmore says he ordered the two positions maintained; that column made the side's first contact. Butler sent the expedition (superior_directing: Butler). Whether Kautz's cavalry column, which made the only assault, was under Gillmore is not settled: Humphreys says Butler sent 'General Gillmore and General Kautz', and Gillmore complains that Kautz 'did not communicate' with him and supposed he had gone on a raid as Butler authorized. The listing is not contradicted for the first combat (rule 2). Butler's indorsement and Gillmore's reply are adversarial; the live ranks are not adopted.
Major Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle VA098, belligerent US, fullname Quincy Gillmore; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…General Gillmore had with him 1,800 infantry of his own troops, under the command of Colonel Hawley, and 1,200 of General Hinks’shumphreys-petersburg-selections-v1 · snapshot
fbc0249868bc…General Gillmore arrived before the works on the City Point road at seven o’clock in the morninghumphreys-petersburg-selections-v1 · snapshot
fbc0249868bc…I ordered the two positions to be maintainedor36-2-gillmore-petersburg-selections-v1 · snapshot
2cb1054a5a93…Confederate: Wise
Grade C under rule 2; echelon detachment_or_post. responsibility_unresolvedsuperior_directing
Other candidates: P.G.T. Beauregard
Humphreys says General Wise, with his brigade and local troops, 'had charge of the defences of Petersburg', and that Wise's command held the works in front of Gillmore and Hinks, where the first contact was made. This names a different officer commanding the side's engaged forces when the fighting began (rule 2, third bullet), so Wise is used and the listed Beauregard is a candidate. Beauregard sent Dearing's brigade, which checked Kautz, and later all the force he could spare (superior_directing: Beauregard). The Home Guards who repulsed Kautz on the Jerusalem Plank Road are not assigned a commander in the inspected passages. Wise is passage-only: the passage gives no first name, so no merge with the v1 listing 'Henry Wise' is made here (proposed for the primary).
Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle VA098, belligerent Confederate, fullname P.G.T. Beauregard; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…General Wise, with his brigade, 2,400 strong, and such local troops as could be got together under exigencies, had charge of the defences of Petersburg.humphreys-petersburg-selections-v1 · snapshot
fbc0249868bc…Wise’s command held the intrench- ments in front of Gillmore and Hinks.humphreys-petersburg-selections-v1 · snapshot
fbc0249868bc…Side strength (ledger v3)
US: grade A, 4,500 (4,280–4,730)
compiled_dependencederivation_unknownsingle_inputwhole_engagement_leakage
| Input | Class | Printed | Basis | Bound | Codes | Passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| us-cw | A | 4,500 | reported_engaged | derivation_unknown | ||
| us-nps | A | 4,500 | reported_engaged | derivation_unknown | dossier claim reported-force-scope | |
| us-gillmore | bound | 1,800 | unknown | lower | partial_scope | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
| us-hinks | bound | 1,200 | unknown | lower | partial_scope | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
| us-kautz | bound | 1,500 | unknown | lower | partial_scope | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
Confederate: grade A, 2,500 (2,380–2,630)
compiled_dependencederivation_unknownsingle_inputwhole_engagement_leakage
| Input | Class | Printed | Basis | Bound | Codes | Passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cs-cw | A | 2,500 | reported_engaged | derivation_unknown | 2,500arnold-cwsac-forces, battle VA098, belligerent Confederate; column description · snapshot a462f6be964b… | |
| cs-nps | A | 2,500 | reported_engaged | derivation_unknown | dossier claim reported-force-scope | |
| cs-wise | bound | 2,400 | unknown | lower | partial_scope | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
Dossier claims
Draft dossier, revision . Claims are extraction records with their quoted passages, not historical adjudication. JSON
information
supportedunresolved Gillmore's 3.40 a.m. dispatch says the crossing of the cavalry could be heard for miles; Humphreys relays his complaint that the ponton bridge was not muffled and put the enemy on guard, and says Gillmore received no communication from Kautz during the day.
Attributed knowledge from an interested report and history; Gillmore's account was written under criticism.
crossing of the cavalry can he heard for miles.or36-2-gillmore-petersburg-selections-v1, p.288 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
2cb1054a5a93…and that the crossing of Kautz’s cavalry could be heard for miles, and, no doubt, put the enemy on his guard.humphreys-petersburg-selections-v1, p.197 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
fbc0249868bc…Receiving no com¬ munication from General Kautz during the day,humphreys-petersburg-selections-v1, p.197 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
fbc0249868bc…logistics
unknownunresolved
No battle-specific supply, ammunition or transport return was inspected. Retrospective descriptions are not readiness measures.
objectives
supportedunresolved Humphreys says Butler's object was to capture Petersburg and destroy the railroad bridge across the Appomattox.
Stated aim from an interested history.
the object being to capture the city and destroy the railroad bridge across the Appomattox.humphreys-petersburg-selections-v1, p.196 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
fbc0249868bc…outcome
supportedpost_outcome The frozen and live results read Confederate victory. Humphreys says Gillmore withdrew without attacking and that Kautz, satisfied he could not capture the town, withdrew followed by Dearing; NPS says Kautz was repulsed by Home Guards and Butler withdrew.
Retain the original result and engagement interval; later movements and campaign contribution are different measures. No new probabilities or individual causal credit.
Kautz, satisfied that he could not capture the town, withdrew, followed by Dearing.humphreys-petersburg-selections-v1, p.197 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
fbc0249868bc…disputedpost_outcome The frozen casualty text reads 120 total; the live field reads zero. Gillmore's loss statement is garbled in OCR, and no other count was inspected.
Original casualty returns were not inspected; preserve totals, categories, cutoffs and differences. No canonical reconciliation or casualty-based opening count; related actions must not be added without resolving population overlap.
responsibility
supportedunresolved Humphreys says Gillmore, with Hinks and Hawley concurring, decided not to attempt the works and withdrew at half-past one, while Kautz attacked alone and was checked when Dearing's brigade, sent by Beauregard, came up. Gillmore says he held both positions expecting to hear from Kautz. Butler's indorsement, relayed by his chief of staff, called the affair disgraceful; Gillmore called the charge unmerited and unjust. The frozen commanders are Major General Gillmore (US) and General Beauregard (CS); the live page gives both as Brigadier General.
Direction and blame are attributed as stated; Butler's and Gillmore's accounts are adversarial. The live ranks are not adopted. No listed commander receives automatic sole credit.
He did not, therefore, make the attempt.humphreys-petersburg-selections-v1, p.197 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
fbc0249868bc…General Dearing’s brigade, sent over by General Beauregard, now came up,humphreys-petersburg-selections-v1, p.197 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
fbc0249868bc…I ordered the two positions to be maintainedor36-2-gillmore-petersburg-selections-v1, p.289 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
2cb1054a5a93…was disgraceful to the Union arms.or36-2-gillmore-petersburg-selections-v1, p.290 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
2cb1054a5a93…unmerited and unjust,or36-2-gillmore-petersburg-selections-v1, p.290 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
2cb1054a5a93…Major Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle VA098, belligerent US, fullname Quincy Gillmore; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle VA098, belligerent Confederate, fullname P.G.T. Beauregard; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…strength
unknownunresolved
No inspected return establishes matched personnel at a common opening boundary. Imported numerical estimates remain unchanged; this pass does not validate them as simultaneous opening forces.
disputedunresolved The frozen force text reads 7,000 (US 4,500; CS 2,500), the Union row carrying 4,500 as bounds and the Confederate row '2,500' as text only; the live field matches. Humphreys gives Gillmore 1,800 infantry of his own under Hawley and 1,200 of Hinks's, Kautz about 1,500 cavalry, and Wise's brigade, 2,400 strong, with such local troops as could be gathered defending Petersburg.
Humphreys' Union components total about 4,500 and match the frozen Union figure; his Confederate figure covers Wise's brigade without the militia and Dearing's cavalry, which also appear in his account. None is adopted as a matched opening strength; live zeros are not measured absence.
7,000 total (US 4,500; CS 2,500)arnold-cwsac-battles, battle VA098; column forces_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…General Gillmore had with him 1,800 infantry of his own troops, under the command of Colonel Hawley, and 1,200 of General Hinks’s,humphreys-petersburg-selections-v1, p.196 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
fbc0249868bc…General Kautz had about 1,500 cavalry.humphreys-petersburg-selections-v1, p.196 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
fbc0249868bc…General Wise, with his brigade, 2,400 strong, and such local troops as could be got together under exigencies, had charge of the defences of Petersburg.humphreys-petersburg-selections-v1, p.197 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
fbc0249868bc…terrain
supportedunresolved Humphreys says Gillmore judged the intrenchments on the City Point road too strongly manned to carry, and that Kautz, after turning the works on the Jerusalem plank road, met an earth intrenchment and stockade on Reservoir Hill with infantry and artillery. Gillmore says that once the nature of the works was ascertained he was convinced an assault would fail.
The works predate the engagement, but their manning was a matter of the day; not tagged. No map verification.
Manned as strongly as they were, General Gillmore was satisfied, after careful examinationhumphreys-petersburg-selections-v1, p.197 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
fbc0249868bc…But here he found an earth intrenchment and stock¬ ade on Reservoir Hill, which had infantry and artillery in it.humphreys-petersburg-selections-v1, p.197 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
fbc0249868bc…As soon as the nature of the works in our front ascertained I was convinced that an assault upon them would in all probability fail,or36-2-gillmore-petersburg-selections-v1, p.289 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
2cb1054a5a93…Open questions
- Butler's June 9-14 papers (No. 1, heavily garbled; read, not selected), Hinks's, Kautz's and the other Union reports (Nos. 3-17), Wise's congratulatory orders and Colston's report (Nos. 18-19) remain deferred.
- NPS/CWSAC (the live NPS page and the frozen Arnold rows) is one family. Humphreys' The Virginia Campaign of ’64 and ’65 (1883) is an interested history by the Army of the Potomac's chief of staff, later commander of its Second Corps, in the same author family as the registered From Gettysburg to the Rapidan; it relies on Meade's, Hancock's, Warren's, Burnside's, Parke's and Wilson's reports and quotes Lee's, Beauregard's and Gordon's despatches, so it is not independent of those families. Gillmore's, Meade's, Hancock's, Burnside's, Wilson's, Hampton's, Stannard's and Lee's papers, printed in Official Records Series I, Volumes XXXVI (Part 2), XL, XLII and XLVI (Part 1), are separate families of interested commanders' accounts; each volume is a shared container, not an additional witness. Lee's telegrams largely relay subordinates' reports. Report dates are not event times or proof of contemporary knowledge.
- No automatic commander attribution, causal campaign score, morale/readiness number or battle/campaign double counting.