Staunton River Bridge VA113
1864-06-25 to 1864-06-25 · VA · Richmond-Petersburg Campaign [June 1864-March 1865] · frozen result: Confederate · NPS summary (as listed)
On June 22, the cavalry divisions of Brig. Gen. James Wilson and Brig. Gen. August Kautz were dispatched from the Petersburg lines to disrupt Confederate rail communications. Riding via Dinwiddie Court House, the raiders cut the South Side Railroad near Ford's Station that evening, destroying tracks, railroad buildings, and two supply trains. On June 23, Wilson proceeded to the junction of the Richmond & Danville Railroad at Burke Station, where he encountered elements of William H.F. Lee's cavalry between Nottoway Court House and Blacks and Whites (modern-day Blackstone). Wilson followed Kautz along the South Side Railroad, destroying about thirty miles of track as he advanced. On June 24, while Kautz remained skirmishing around Burkeville, Wilson crossed over to Meherrin Station on the Richmond & Danville and began destroying track. On June 25, Wilson and Kautz continued tearing up track south to the Staunton River Bridge, where they were delayed by Home Guards, who prevented destruction of the bridge. Lee's cavalry division closed on the Federals from the northeast, forcing them to abandon their attempts to capture and destroy the bridge. By this time, the raiders were nearly 100 miles from Union lines.
Command responsibility (ledger v2)
US: James H. Wilson
Grade A under rule 3a; echelon detachment_or_post. superior_directing
Other candidates: August Kautz
Wilson and Kautz are both listed as Brigadier General (a tie). Wilson's reports say Kautz reported to him with his division and that the expedition's troops were under his command; at the bridge he directed Kautz to dismount and attack (rule 3(a)). Wilson received his instructions for the expedition from Meade (superior_directing: Meade). Kautz, who led the attack on the bridge, is a candidate.
Brigadier Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle VA113, belligerent US, fullname James H. Wilson; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Brigadier Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle VA113, belligerent US, fullname August Kautz; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…On the 21st Brigadier-General Kautz reported to me with his division of four regiments.or40-1-wilson-south-side-raid-selections-v1 · snapshot
ea48fd364b6e…I have the honor to submit the following report of oper¬ ations of the troops under my command during the recent expeditionor40-1-wilson-south-side-raid-selections-v1 · snapshot
ea48fd364b6e…directed General Kautz to dismount his division and endeavor to push close enough to the end of the bridge to set fire to it.or40-1-wilson-south-side-raid-selections-v1 · snapshot
ea48fd364b6e…Confederate: William H.F. "Rooney" Lee
Grade C under rule 2; echelon division. responsibility_unresolved
Other candidates: Farinholt
Single CWSAC listing. R. E. Lee reports W. H. F. Lee's attack on the raiders near the bridge, which Wilson says was simultaneous with Kautz's attack on the bridge. The same dispatch names Captain Farinholt 'commanding at Staunton River bridge', whose garrison and Home Guards (description) repulsed the attack on the bridge. No inspected passage places the bridge garrison under W. H. F. Lee or names one officer over both forces, so command of the side's engaged forces was divided. The listing stands, but the sources name two commanders of simultaneous engaged forces (rule 2, grade C); Farinholt, passage-only, is a candidate.
Major Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle VA113, belligerent Confederate, fullname William H.F. "Rooney" Lee; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…General W. H. F. Lee reports that he attacked the enemy near Staunton River bridge yesterday after¬ noon and drove hint until dark.or40-1-lee-petersburg-selections-v1 · snapshot
f38029b514db…Simultane¬ ously with Kautz’s attack of the bridge Lee’s cavalry attacked our rear, under Chapmanor40-1-wilson-south-side-raid-selections-v1 · snapshot
ea48fd364b6e…Captain Farinholt, com¬ manding at Staunton River bridgeor40-1-lee-petersburg-selections-v1 · snapshot
f38029b514db…where they were delayed by Home Guards, who prevented destruction of the bridgearnold-cwsac-battles, battle VA113; column description · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Side strength (ledger v3)
US: grade C, 5,500 (3,850–7,150)
applicability_unresolvedbasis_mixedsingle_inputwhole_engagement_leakage
| Input | Class | Printed | Basis | Bound | Codes | Passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| us-wilson | C | 5,500 | unknown | engagement_link_unknown | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
Confederate: grade A, 4,100 (3,900–4,310)
basis_mixedcompiled_dependencederivation_unknownsingle_inputwhole_engagement_leakage
| Input | Class | Printed | Basis | Bound | Codes | Passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cs-wilson-bridge | bound | 500–600 | unknown | lower | adversary_or_hearsay_estimatepartial_scope | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
| cs-cws2 | A | 4,100 | reported_engaged | derivation_unknown | 4100arnold-cws2-forces, battle VA113, belligerent Confederate; column strength · snapshot 523147288617… |
Dossier claims
Draft dossier, revision petersburg-review-correction-2026-09-25. Claims are extraction records with their quoted passages, not historical adjudication. JSON
information
supportedunresolved Lee reports that the bridge commander, Captain Farinholt, telegraphed on the 25th his confidence of being able to protect it; Wilson says careful inquiry showed no means of crossing without letting the enemy on the north bank cross too.
Attributed knowledge in dispatches and a report; not proof of what either commander knew at the time of the attack.
A dispatch dated 25th was received this morning from Captain Farinholt, com¬ manding at Staunton River bridge, expressing his confidence of being able to protect it.or40-1-lee-petersburg-selections-v1, p.751 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
f38029b514db…Having found, from careful inquiry, there were no means of crossing the riveror40-1-wilson-south-side-raid-selections-v1, p.622 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea48fd364b6e…logistics
supportedunresolved Wilson says the troops carried five days' light rations and about 100 rounds of ammunition in wagons, that the implements for destroying railroad had not arrived when the expedition started, and that many of Kautz's men fainted from exhaustion, thirst and heat before the bridge.
Statements from the raid commander; no supply return inspected.
The troops were supplied with five days’ light rations, and about 100 rounds of ammunition in wagons.or40-1-wilson-south-side-raid-selections-v1, p.621 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea48fd364b6e…The implements with which the expedition was to have been furnished had not arrived when the expedition started.or40-1-wilson-south-side-raid-selections-v1, p.630 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea48fd364b6e…Many of the men fainted from exhaustion, thirstj and heat.or40-1-wilson-south-side-raid-selections-v1, p.621 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea48fd364b6e…objectives
supportedunresolved Wilson says the High Bridge and the Roanoke (Staunton River) bridge were especially to be aimed at, and that Kautz attacked hoping to reach the northern end long enough to burn it.
Stated aims from the raid commander.
The High Bridge on the South Side road and Roanoke bridge on the Danville road were especially to be aimed at.or40-1-wilson-south-side-raid-selections-v1, p.620 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea48fd364b6e…hoping to reach the northern end and hold it long enough to burn it,or40-1-wilson-south-side-raid-selections-v1, p.626 (running head reads 'OPERATIONS KT SE.' in OCR; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea48fd364b6e…outcome
disputedpost_outcome The frozen and live results read Confederate victory. Lee relays W. H. F. Lee's statement that the enemy was signally repulsed at the bridge and retreated; Wilson says Kautz had to give up the attempt, and that the expedition's objects had in the main been accomplished.
Retain the original result and engagement interval; later movements and campaign contribution are different measures. No new probabilities or individual causal credit. Wilson's claim concerns the raid as a whole, not this record.
He also states that the enemy was signally repulsed at the bridge the same eveningor40-1-lee-petersburg-selections-v1, p.751 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
f38029b514db…the enemy was signally repulsed at the bridge the same evening and retreated this morning,or40-1-lee-petersburg-selections-v1, p.751 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
f38029b514db…After a most gallant and exhausting effort he was compelled to give u}) the task.or40-1-wilson-south-side-raid-selections-v1, p.621 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea48fd364b6e…The objects of the expedition had in the main been accomplished.or40-1-wilson-south-side-raid-selections-v1, p.622 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea48fd364b6e…disputedpost_outcome The frozen casualty text reads 150 total; the live field reads zero. Lee relays W. H. F. Lee's report of about thirty enemy dead left on the field; Wilson gives about 900 killed, wounded and missing for the whole expedition.
Original casualty returns were not inspected; preserve totals, categories, cutoffs and differences. No canonical reconciliation or casualty-based opening count; related actions must not be added without resolving population overlap. Wilson's figure is raid-wide and is not assigned to this record.
He also states that the enemy was signally repulsed at the bridge the same eveningor40-1-lee-petersburg-selections-v1, p.751 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
f38029b514db…leaving about thirty of his dead on the field.or40-1-lee-petersburg-selections-v1, p.751 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
f38029b514db…The loss sustained by the entire command was about 900 men, killed, wounded, and missing.or40-1-wilson-south-side-raid-selections-v1, p.624 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea48fd364b6e…responsibility
supportedunresolved Wilson says he directed Kautz to dismount and push to the bridge, then determined to withdraw eastward; Lee reports W. H. F. Lee's attack on the raiders' rear near the bridge. The frozen commanders are Major General W. H. F. Lee (CS) and Brigadier Generals Wilson and Kautz (US); the live page lists Wilson and 'Major General William Lee'.
Direction attributed as stated. No listed commander receives automatic sole credit.
directed General Kautz to dismount his division and endeavor to push close enough to the end of the bridge to set fire to it.or40-1-wilson-south-side-raid-selections-v1, p.621 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea48fd364b6e…I determined to withdraw to the eastward and march back to the James River.or40-1-wilson-south-side-raid-selections-v1, p.622 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea48fd364b6e…General W. H. F. Lee reports that he attacked the enemy near Staunton River bridge yesterday after¬ noon and drove hint until dark.or40-1-lee-petersburg-selections-v1, p.751 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
f38029b514db…Major Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle VA113, belligerent Confederate, fullname William H.F. "Rooney" Lee; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Brigadier Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle VA113, belligerent US, fullname James H. Wilson; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Brigadier Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle VA113, belligerent US, fullname August Kautz; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…strength
unknownunresolved
No inspected return establishes matched personnel at a common opening boundary. The frozen side-specific numerical strength bounds are blank (missing_numeric_strength). No figure in this pass is adopted as a simultaneous opening force.
disputedunresolved The frozen force text reads 'Divisions (4,000 total)' and the live field zero. Wilson's February 1865 report says the expedition set out with about 5,500 cavalry and twelve guns and found the bridge defended by 500 or 600 men and a battery of six guns; his July 3, 1864 report says the militia of eight counties and a small force from Danville.
Wilson's 5,500 is the raid's starting strength on June 22 and his defender figure an estimate; the frozen 4,000 is undivided. None is adopted as a matched opening strength; live zeros are not measured absence.
Divisions (4,000 total)arnold-cwsac-battles, battle VA113; column forces_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…consisting of about 5,500 cavalry and twelve guns,or40-1-wilson-south-side-raid-selections-v1, p.621 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea48fd364b6e…The bridge was found well defended — 500 or 600 men and a battery of six guns strongly posted in earth-works on the south side of the river.or40-1-wilson-south-side-raid-selections-v1, p.621 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea48fd364b6e…defended by tbe militia of eight counties and a small force from Dan¬ ville,or40-1-wilson-south-side-raid-selections-v1, p.627 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea48fd364b6e…terrain
supportedinherited Wilson says the approach to the bridge lay through a bottom field of growing grain under guns in works with four lines of rifle-trench, that the Staunton was too deep to ford, and that the site's topography made his position dangerous.
The river and the defenders' works predate the raiders' arrival. No map verification.
the approach to the head of the bridge through a bottom field of growing grain.or40-1-wilson-south-side-raid-selections-v1, p.621 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea48fd364b6e…four lines of rifle- trench between them and the river-bank?or40-1-wilson-south-side-raid-selections-v1, p.626 (running head reads 'OPERATIONS KT SE.' in OCR; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea48fd364b6e…the Staunton too deep for fording and Unprovided with bridges or steam ferries,or40-1-wilson-south-side-raid-selections-v1, p.627 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea48fd364b6e…Our position, from the peculiar topography of the site, was rather dangerous,or40-1-wilson-south-side-raid-selections-v1, p.627 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
ea48fd364b6e…Open questions
- Kautz's report (No. 280), the reports of Kautz's brigade commanders, W. H. F. Lee's and Farinholt's reports, and Humphreys' raid passage (pp.236-241; read, not selected under the three-family ceiling) remain deferred.
- NPS/CWSAC (the live NPS page and the frozen Arnold rows) is one family. Humphreys' The Virginia Campaign of ’64 and ’65 (1883) is an interested history by the Army of the Potomac's chief of staff, later commander of its Second Corps, in the same author family as the registered From Gettysburg to the Rapidan; it relies on Meade's, Hancock's, Warren's, Burnside's, Parke's and Wilson's reports and quotes Lee's, Beauregard's and Gordon's despatches, so it is not independent of those families. Gillmore's, Meade's, Hancock's, Burnside's, Wilson's, Hampton's, Stannard's and Lee's papers, printed in Official Records Series I, Volumes XXXVI (Part 2), XL, XLII and XLVI (Part 1), are separate families of interested commanders' accounts; each volume is a shared container, not an additional witness. Lee's telegrams largely relay subordinates' reports. Report dates are not event times or proof of contemporary knowledge.
- No automatic commander attribution, causal campaign score, morale/readiness number or battle/campaign double counting.