Vicksburg MS011
1863-05-18 to 1863-07-04 · MS · Grant's Operations Against Vicksburg [March-July 1863] · frozen result: Union · NPS summary (as listed)
In May and June of 1863, Maj. Gen. Ulysses S. Grant's armies converged on Vicksburg, investing the city and entrapping a Confederate army under Lt. Gen. John Pemberton. On July 4, Vicksburg surrendered after prolonged siege operations. This was the culmination of one of the most brilliant military campaigns of the war. With the loss of Pemberton's army and this vital stronghold on the Mississippi, the Confederacy was effectively split in half. Grant's successes in the West boosted his reputation, leading ultimately to his appointment as General-in-Chief of the Union armies.
Command responsibility (ledger v2)
US: Ulysses S. Grant
Grade A under rule 2; echelon army.
A cited passage states the command.
Major Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle MS011, belligerent US, fullname Ulysses S. Grant; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Maj. Gen. Ulysses S. Grant's armies converged on Vicksburgarnold-cwsac-battles, battle MS011; column description · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Confederate: John C. Pemberton
Grade A under rule 2; echelon army.
A cited passage states the command.
Lieutenant Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle MS011, belligerent Confederate, fullname John C. Pemberton; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…a Confederate army under Lt. Gen. John Pembertonarnold-cwsac-battles, battle MS011; column description · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Side strength (ledger v3)
US: grade C, 71,140 (49,800–92,480)
basis_mixedpost_start_informationsingle_inputwhole_engagement_leakage
| Input | Class | Printed | Basis | Bound | Codes | Passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| us-greene-june30 | C | 71,141 | unknown | post_engagement_state | dossier claim reported-force-scope | |
| us-greene-may22 | bound | 40,000 | present_for_duty | partial_scopepost_engagement_state | dossier claim reported-force-scope | |
| us-lv-assault | bound | 45,556 | reported_engaged | partial_interval | Total engaged [4] 45,556livermore-transcription-v1, p.100 (page image livermore-p100-image-v1) · snapshot e9fc742fdcb6… |
Confederate: grade A, 20,000 (19,000–21,000)
basis_mixedsingle_inputwhole_engagement_leakage
| Input | Class | Printed | Basis | Bound | Codes | Passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cs-greene-start | A | 20,000 | reported_effective | dossier claim reported-force-scope | ||
| cs-greene-late | C | 22,000 | unknown | post_engagement_state | dossier claim reported-force-scope | |
| cs-lv-assault | bound | 22,301 | reported_effective | partial_intervalpost_engagement_state | Total effectives [7] 22,301livermore-transcription-v1, p.100 (page image livermore-p100-image-v1) · snapshot e9fc742fdcb6… |
Nested records
| Containing | Contained | Outcome | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vicksburg MS011 | Helena AR008 | not_nested | Helena, Arkansas, was attacked by Holmes to relieve pressure on Vicksburg; it was not part of the siege. |
| Vicksburg MS011 | Milliken's Bend LA011 | not_nested | Milliken's Bend, Louisiana, was a separate attack on the west bank by McCulloch's brigade, which was not part of Pemberton's army at Vicksburg. The inspected passages do not exclude the Union African Brigade and 23rd Iowa from MS011's Union force scope. |
Dossier claims
Draft dossier, revision vicksburg-1863-review-correction-2026-09-25. Claims are extraction records with their quoted passages, not historical adjudication. JSON
information
supportedunresolved Greene says Pemberton's hopes of relief diminished and then disappeared as June wore on. Pemberton says that, with his officers' unanimous opinion against evacuation and no relief from Johnston, surrender with or without terms was the only alternative left.
The defending commander's account and a history; no inspected message log.
Pemberton's hopes of re- lief began gradually to diminish, and then to disappear.greene-vicksburg-1863-selections-v1, p.200 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
04879aee2029…and no relief from General Johnston, a surrender with or without terms was the only alternative left me.or24-1-pemberton-selections-v1, p.283 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
8552de8a13f3…logistics
supportedunresolved Greene says the garrison was on reduced rations but not at starvation point, and its ammunition deficient but husbanded. Pemberton says reduced rations are undeniable but denies that want of subsistence compelled the surrender.
Supply statements from a history and the defending commander's report; no inspected commissary return.
His men were on reduced rations, but were not at starva- tion point ;greene-vicksburg-1863-selections-v1, p.200 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
04879aee2029…his ammunition was deficient., but it had been carefully husbanded during the siege,greene-vicksburg-1863-selections-v1, p.200 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
04879aee2029…That the men were put ui)on greatly reduced rations is undeniably truejor24-1-pemberton-selections-v1, p.286 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
8552de8a13f3…The assertion that the surrender of Vicksburg was compelled by the want ot subsistence, or that the garrison was starved out, is one entirely destitute of truth.or24-1-pemberton-selections-v1, p.285 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
8552de8a13f3…objectives
supportedunresolved Greene says Grant would offer only unconditional surrender, then formulated terms of individual paroles, and that Pemberton accepted them. Pemberton says he chose July 4 expecting better terms on that day.
Stated aims from a history and the defending commander's report; Pemberton's reasoning about the date is his own.
his only terms were an unconditional surrender of the city and gar- rison,greene-vicksburg-1863-selections-v1, p.204 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
04879aee2029…individual paroles signed by every officer and man,greene-vicksburg-1863-selections-v1, p.205 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
04879aee2029…I believed that upon that day I should obtain better terms.or24-1-pemberton-selections-v1, p.285 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
8552de8a13f3…outcome
supportedunresolved Greene says the May 22 assault was unsuccessful at all points and that Grant's losses in the two assaults of May 19 and 22 were over 4,000, more than three-fourths of them on the 22d. He says the Confederate loss on May 22 is not known but probably did not much exceed 500, Forney's division losing only 42 killed and 95 wounded.
One history's figures for the assaults inside the siege interval; not added to the siege totals.
The result of the assault was therefore unsuccessful at all points.greene-vicksburg-1863-selections-v1, p.184 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
04879aee2029…Grant's loss in the two assaults of May 19th and 22d were over 4,000,greene-vicksburg-1863-selections-v1, p.185 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
04879aee2029…more than three-fourths of them being on the 22dgreene-vicksburg-1863-selections-v1, p.185 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
04879aee2029…The Confederate loss is not known ;greene-vicksburg-1863-selections-v1, p.184 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
04879aee2029…ably did not much exceed 500.greene-vicksburg-1863-selections-v1, p.185 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
04879aee2029…the loss was only 42 killed and 95 wounded.greene-vicksburg-1863-selections-v1, p.185 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
04879aee2029…supportedpost_outcome The frozen and live results read Union victory. NPS says Vicksburg surrendered on July 4 after prolonged siege operations; Pemberton says the garrison was surrendered at 10 a.m.; Greene says 29,391 were paroled, 790 refused parole, and the force surrendered was about 31,000, with 172 guns.
Retain the original result and engagement interval; later movements and campaign contribution are different measures. No new probabilities or individual causal credit. NPS's statements about the Confederacy being split and Grant's reputation are campaign context.
On July 4, Vicksburg surrendered after prolonged siege operations.nps-ms011-v1, Description · snapshot
fce0d46bc13a…the garrison was surrendered at. 10 a. m.,or24-1-pemberton-selections-v1, p.285 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
8552de8a13f3…was 29,391greene-vicksburg-1863-selections-v1, p.207 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
04879aee2029…790 refused to be paroled,greene-vicksburg-1863-selections-v1, p.207 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
04879aee2029…the total force surrendered was, in round numbers, 31,000.greene-vicksburg-1863-selections-v1, p.207 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
04879aee2029…The artillery found in the place numbered 172 pieces,greene-vicksburg-1863-selections-v1, p.207 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
04879aee2029…disputedpost_outcome The frozen casualty text reads 19,233 total (US 10,142; CS 9,091); the live field reads 37532 total (US 4835; CS 32697;). Greene says Grant's losses in the entire campaign, including the Jackson expedition, were a little less than 10,000, and that about 31,000 surrendered.
Original casualty returns were not inspected; preserve totals, categories, cutoffs and differences. No canonical reconciliation or casualty-based opening count; related actions must not be added without resolving population overlap. Greene's campaign-wide Union figure spans other frozen engagements and must not be assigned to the siege; the live Confederate figure appears to include the surrendered garrison. No figure is adopted.
19,233 total (US 10,142; CS 9,091)arnold-cwsac-battles, battle MS011; column casualties_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Grant's losses in the entire campaign, including the expe- dition against Jackson, were a little less than 10,000,greene-vicksburg-1863-selections-v1, p.207 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
04879aee2029…responsibility
supportedunresolved Pemberton says that so far as he knows no brigade or regimental commander favored cutting out, that every division and brigade commander but Baldwin approved the terms, and that he surrendered because the men were overpowered and worn down. Greene judges it probable that the most potent cause was the temper of the men. The live heading ranks Grant Lieutenant General against the frozen Major General.
Stated reasons and judgments are attributed; the frozen commanders Grant and Pemberton do not receive automatic sole credit. The heading rank is not adopted.
So far as I know, not a solitary brigade or regimental commander favored the scheme of cutting out,or24-1-pemberton-selections-v1, p.283 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
8552de8a13f3…were approved by every divis- ion and brigade commander with one exceptionor24-1-pemberton-selections-v1, p.285 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
8552de8a13f3…but because they were overpowered by numbers, worn dov n with fatigue,or24-1-pemberton-selections-v1, p.286 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
8552de8a13f3…It is probable that the most potent cause of surrender was the temper of the men.greene-vicksburg-1863-selections-v1, p.201 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
04879aee2029…Major Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle MS011, belligerent US, fullname Ulysses S. Grant; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…strength
unknownunresolved
No inspected return establishes matched personnel at a common opening boundary. The frozen side-specific numerical strength bounds are blank (missing_numeric_strength). No figure in this pass is adopted as a simultaneous opening force.
disputedunresolved The frozen force field names the Army of the Tennessee and the Army of Vicksburg without counts; the live field reads zero. Greene gives about 20,000 effective defenders when the siege began, 40,000 Union infantry present for duty on May 22, and Grant's army at 71,141 men and 248 guns on June 30; by late June the garrison's returns showed nearly 22,000, with about 7,000 in the hospitals. Pemberton says the garrison held out against an enemy five times its number.
Figures at different dates and scopes; none is adopted as matched opening strength. Live zeros are not measured absence.
Army of the Tennessee [US]; Army of Vicksburg [CS]arnold-cwsac-battles, battle MS011; column forces_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…The troops for the defence numbered about 20,000 effec- tive men,greene-vicksburg-1863-selections-v1, p.176 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
04879aee2029…Of the 40,000 infantry present for duty in Grant's army that daygreene-vicksburg-1863-selections-v1, p.184 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
04879aee2029…carried the total strength of Grant's army to 71,141 men, and 248 guns, on June 30th.greene-vicksburg-1863-selections-v1, p.188 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
04879aee2029…so that their numbers now amounted to nearly 22,000,greene-vicksburg-1863-selections-v1, p.201 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
04879aee2029…about 7,000 were in the hospitals.greene-vicksburg-1863-selections-v1, p.201 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
04879aee2029…They had held the place against an enemy five times their number,or24-1-pemberton-selections-v1, p.286 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
8552de8a13f3…terrain
supportedinherited Greene says Vicksburg stood on bluffs about 250 feet high cut by deep ravines that allowed no manoeuvre but suited fortification, and that the line, selected in autumn 1862, had been thoroughly fortified through the winter and spring, with batteries whose parapets were 25 feet thick, defended by 128 guns when the siege began.
Inherited relative to the May 18 start; no map verification or numerical terrain effect.
These bluffs are about 250 feet in heightgreene-vicksburg-1863-selections-v1, p.174 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
04879aee2029…no manoeuvres of troops are possible over it.greene-vicksburg-1863-selections-v1, p.174 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
04879aee2029…This line had been selected for fortification in the autumn of 1862, and during the winter and spring it had been most thoroughly fortified.greene-vicksburg-1863-selections-v1, p.175 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
04879aee2029…the parapets of these batteries were 25 feet thick and 10 feet high,greene-vicksburg-1863-selections-v1, p.176 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
04879aee2029…They were defended when the siege began by 128 pieces of artillery,greene-vicksburg-1863-selections-v1, p.176 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
04879aee2029…Open questions
- Grant's, the corps commanders' and the Confederate division reports, Johnston's siege correspondence and the returns remain deferred.
- NPS/CWSAC is one family. Greene is one retrospective history by a non-participant, founded on the Official Records. Each report author selected from Official Records Volumes XXIV and XXII is a separate family of interested accounts; the volumes are shared containers, not additional witnesses, and letters or telegrams by others quoted inside a selected document are not separate families. Report dates are not event times or proof of contemporary knowledge.
- No automatic commander attribution, causal campaign score, morale/readiness number or battle/campaign double counting.