Columbia TN034
1864-11-24 to 1864-11-29 · TN · Franklin-Nashville Campaign [September-December 1864] · frozen result: Confederate · NPS summary (as listed)
Conflict near Columbia, during Hood's 1864 Tennessee invasion, constituted a Confederate diversion as part of a maneuver designed to cross the Duck River upstream and interdict the Union army's line of communications with Nashville. As Gen. John Bell Hood's army advanced northeastward from Florence, Alabama, Maj. Gen. John M. Schofield's force quickly withdrew from Pulaski to Columbia, arriving on November 24, just ahead of Forrest's Rebel cavalry. The Federals built two lines of earthworks south of the town while skirmishing with enemy cavalry on November 24 and 25. Hood advanced his infantry on the following day but did not assault. He made demonstrations along the front while marching two corps of his army to Davis Ford, some five miles eastward on the Duck River. Schofield correctly interpreted Hood's moves, but foul weather prevented him from crossing to the north bank before November 28, leaving Columbia to the Confederates. The next day, both armies marched north for Spring Hill. Schofield had slowed Hood's movement but had not stopped him.
Command responsibility (ledger v2)
US: John M. Schofield
Grade A under rule 2; echelon army. superior_directing
Rule 2. Cox says Thomas had committed to Schofield 'the command of the troops immediately opposed to Hood', and Schofield ordered the positions and the crossing. Thomas, at Nashville, urged by despatch that the troops retreat as little as possible and hold a bridge-head at Columbia (superior_directing: Thomas). Nothing contradicts the listing.
Major Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle TN034, belligerent US, fullname John M. Schofield; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…General Thomas had committed to General Schofield the command of the troops immediately opposed to Hoodcox-franklin-nashville-selections-v2 · snapshot
3162503ba1ef…Maj. Gen. John M. Schofield's force quickly withdrew from Pulaski to Columbia, arriving on November 24arnold-cwsac-battles, battle TN034; column description · snapshot
952b5d08402a…During the night of the 25th Schofield ordered Cox to move two brigades of his division to the north side of the river,cox-franklin-nashville-selections-v2 · snapshot
3162503ba1ef…Confederate: John Bell Hood
Grade A under rule 2; echelon army.
Rule 2. The first combat in the interval (24th-25th) was with Forrest's cavalry of Hood's army (subordinate context). Hood advanced the infantry, then marched two corps to Davis Ford, leaving Lee with two divisions in front of Columbia with instructions to press the enemy; Lee thus led the part of the army still at Columbia on the 29th, which is subordinate context, not a change in the side's command. Nothing contradicts the listing.
Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle TN034, belligerent Confederate, fullname John Bell Hood; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…As Gen. John Bell Hood's army advanced northeastward from Florence, Alabamaarnold-cwsac-battles, battle TN034; column description · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Hood advanced his infantry on the following day but did not assault.arnold-cwsac-battles, battle TN034; column description · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Lieutenant-General Lee, left in front of the enemy at Columbia, was instructed to press the enemy the moment he abandoned his position at that point.or45-1-hood-tennessee-selections-v2 · snapshot
947886786c78…Side strength (ledger v3)
US: grade D: no usable figure (modelled in the rating runs)
whole_engagement_leakage
| Input | Class | Printed | Basis | Bound | Codes | Passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| us-cox-4th | bound | 12,331 | present_for_duty | lower | engagement_link_unknownpartial_scope | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
| us-cox-23rd | bound | 10,624 | present_for_duty | lower | engagement_link_unknownpartial_scope | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
| us-cox-wilson | bound | 7,000 | unknown | lower | engagement_link_unknownpartial_scope | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
Confederate: grade C, 35,000 (21,420–45,500)
applicability_unresolvedwhole_engagement_leakage
| Input | Class | Printed | Basis | Bound | Codes | Passage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cs-cox-53938 | C | 53,938 | reported_present | engagement_link_unknown | dossier claim reported-force-scope | |
| cs-cox-44729 | bound | 44,729 | reported_present | lower | engagement_link_unknownpartial_scope | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
| cs-beauregard-35000 | C | 35,000 | reported_effective | engagement_link_unknown | dossier claim reported-force-scope | |
| cs-hood-30600 | C | 30,600 | unknown | scope_unresolved | dossier claim reported-force-scope |
Nested records
| Containing | Contained | Outcome | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Columbia TN034 | Spring Hill TN035 | nesting_unresolved | The Columbia description frames its demonstrations as a diversion for Hood's upstream crossing, the maneuver that produced Spring Hill, and its listed forces (the Army of Tennessee; the Twenty-third Corps and elements of the Fourth) include the troops engaged at Spring Hill. But it narrates no fighting at Spring Hill and ends with both armies marching north for it. No inspected passage settles whether the Columbia record's scope includes the Spring Hill engagement. |
Dossier claims
Draft dossier, revision franklin-nashville-review-correction-2026-09-25. Claims are extraction records with their quoted passages, not historical adjudication. JSON
information
supportedunresolved Cox says an examination of the country on the 24th satisfied Schofield that Hood would try to turn his position, and that Wilson's 1 a.m. report on the 29th that Hood's infantry was crossing reached Schofield only at daylight because the messenger had to go by Spring Hill. Hood says the enemy discovered his intention when he was well on the flank. NPS says Schofield correctly interpreted Hood's moves.
Attributed knowledge from an interested history and report; the dispatches were not inspected.
a careful examination of the country satisfied Schofield that he must expect Hood to try to turn his posi- tion,cox-franklin-nashville-selections-v2, p.67 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3162503ba1ef…so that the intelligence was only received at daylight in the morning.cox-franklin-nashville-selections-v2, p.70 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3162503ba1ef…When I had gotten well on his flank the enemy discovered my intentionor45-1-hood-tennessee-selections-v2, p.652 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
947886786c78…logistics
supportedunresolved Cox says storms and frozen mud delayed the rebuilding of the railroad to Tuscumbia and Hood's wagon trains, that Hood could not move faster than ten miles a day, and that on the night of the 27th Schofield partly destroyed the railway bridge and destroyed his heavy wooden pontoon bridge for want of transportation. Hood says the lack of a good map and the deep mud prevented him overtaking Schofield before Columbia. NPS says foul weather delayed the Union crossing.
Transport and weather statements from an interested history and report; no supply return inspected.
The weather, however, had proven a formidable obstacle, delaying the rebuilding of the railroad between Tuscumbia and Cherokee Station,cox-franklin-nashville-selections-v2, p.63 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3162503ba1ef…his utmost exertions having failed to move his army faster than ten miles a day.cox-franklin-nashville-selections-v2, p.66 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3162503ba1ef…partly destroying the railway bridge,cox-franklin-nashville-selections-v2, p.69 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3162503ba1ef…He was also obliged to destroy the pontoon bridge, which was of heavy wooden boats, for which he had no means of transportation.cox-franklin-nashville-selections-v2, p.69 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3162503ba1ef…The want of a good map of the country, and the deep mud through which the army marched, prevented our overtaking the enemy before he reached Columbia,or45-1-hood-tennessee-selections-v2, p.652 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
947886786c78…foul weather prevented him from crossing to the north bank before November 28,nps-tn034-v1, Description · snapshot
769adc3168ce…objectives
supportedunresolved Hood says he hoped to place his army between Schofield and Nashville and, on the 29th, to turn the Union flank at or near Spring Hill and cut off the force at Columbia. Cox says Thomas wanted Schofield to retreat as little and as slowly as possible and to keep a bridge-head. NPS calls the demonstrations at Columbia a diversion to cross upstream.
Stated aims from interested reports and a modern summary.
I hoped to be able to place the army between these forces of the enemy and Nashville;or45-1-hood-tennessee-selections-v2, p.652 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
947886786c78…my object being to turn the enemy’s flank,or45-1-hood-tennessee-selections-v2, p.652 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
947886786c78…Thomas's despatches to Schofield had all contained the strong wish that the troops might retreat as little and as slowly as possible,cox-franklin-nashville-selections-v2, p.65 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3162503ba1ef…Thomas still urged that the effort be made to cover the railway and pontoon bridges with a bridge-head,cox-franklin-nashville-selections-v2, p.67 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3162503ba1ef…constituted a Confederate diversion as part of a maneuver designed to cross the Duck River upstreamnps-tn034-v1, Description · snapshot
769adc3168ce…outcome
disputedpost_outcome The frozen and live results read Confederate victory. Hood and Cox place the Union evacuation of the town on the night of the 27th; NPS says foul weather prevented the Union crossing before November 28, leaving Columbia to the Confederates, and that Schofield slowed but did not stop Hood. Cox says Lee's attempt to cross at Columbia on the afternoon of the 29th was driven back.
Retain the original result and engagement interval; later movements and campaign contribution are different measures. No new probabilities or individual causal credit. The evacuation date differs between the live summary and the two other families.
During the night, however, he evacuated the town,or45-1-hood-tennessee-selections-v2, p.652 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
947886786c78…moved the whole of his command to the north side of the river, in the night of the 27th,cox-franklin-nashville-selections-v2, p.69 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3162503ba1ef…Schofield had slowed Hood's movement but had not stopped him.nps-tn034-v1, Description · snapshot
769adc3168ce…made no further effort to cross the river during the evening.cox-franklin-nashville-selections-v2, p.79 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3162503ba1ef…supportedpost_outcome The frozen casualty text reads Unknown and the live field reads zeros. No inspected passage gives a casualty count for the Columbia operations.
Original casualty returns were not inspected; preserve totals, categories, cutoffs and differences. No canonical reconciliation or casualty-based opening count; related actions must not be added without resolving population overlap. Live zeros are not measured absence.
responsibility
supportedunresolved Cox says Schofield ordered Cox's two brigades north of the river on the night of the 25th and moved the whole command across on the night of the 27th, and that Hood 'was too wary to make an assault'; Hood says he left Lee, with the other two divisions of his corps, in front of Columbia (Johnson's division going with Hood) with instructions to press the enemy when he abandoned the position. The frozen commanders are Major General Schofield and General Hood. Cox's own division is one of the actors in his account.
Direction is attributed as the sources state; Cox is an interested participant. No listed commander receives automatic sole credit.
During the night of the 25th Schofield ordered Cox to move two brigades of his division to the north side of the river,cox-franklin-nashville-selections-v2, p.67 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3162503ba1ef…moved the whole of his command to the north side of the river, in the night of the 27th,cox-franklin-nashville-selections-v2, p.69 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3162503ba1ef…Hood was too wary to make an assault of the lines,cox-franklin-nashville-selections-v2, p.66 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3162503ba1ef…leaving the other divisions of Lee’s corps in the enemy’s front at Columbia.or45-1-hood-tennessee-selections-v2, p.652 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
947886786c78…Lieutenant-General Lee, left in front of the enemy at Columbia, was instructed to press the enemy the moment he abandoned his position at that point.or45-1-hood-tennessee-selections-v2, p.653 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
947886786c78…Major Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle TN034, belligerent US, fullname John M. Schofield; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…Generalarnold-cwsac-commanders, battle TN034, belligerent Confederate, fullname John Bell Hood; column rank · snapshot
6c587c298717…strength
unknownunresolved
No inspected return establishes matched personnel at a common opening boundary. The frozen side-specific numerical strength bounds are blank (missing_numeric_strength). No figure in this pass is adopted as a simultaneous opening force.
disputedunresolved The frozen force text names the XXIII Corps and elements of the IV Corps against the Army of Tennessee with no numbers; the live field reads zeros. Cox, citing official returns, says Hood had 41,185 infantry and artillery and 3,544 cavalry (44,729) at Florence on November 6, and 53,938 present after Forrest's 9,209 joined about November 15, against Beauregard's estimate of 35,000 effective; Thomas's October 31 returns showed 48,975 infantry and artillery and 5,591 cavalry present for duty, with the Fourth Corps at 12,331 and the Twenty-third at 10,624. Efforts had raised Wilson's cavalry to about 7,000 equipped, but five regiments sent between the 24th and 27th did not reach the front until the 30th. Hood's addenda table gives an effective total of 30,600 on November 6, and its indorsement reads 'Crossed Tennessee, November 21, 30,600 men.'
Army-wide returns for different dates and bases (present, present for duty, effective); none measures the force engaged at Columbia. In the garbled OCR table of Hood's addenda the cavalry and artillery components (2,306 and 2,405) read the same on both dates; whether the effective totals include Forrest's cavalry is not established. None is adopted as a matched opening strength; live zeros are not measured absence.
XXIII Army Corps and elements of IV Army Corps [US]; Army of Tennessee [CS]arnold-cwsac-battles, battle TN034; column forces_text · snapshot
952b5d08402a…Hood had present with him 41,185 infantry and artillery, and 3,544 cavalry, making an aggregate of 44,729.cox-franklin-nashville-selections-v2, p.11 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3162503ba1ef…numbering 9,209 present, and increasing the aggregate to 53,938 officers and men present.cox-franklin-nashville-selections-v2, p.12 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3162503ba1ef…was 27,285 infantry and artillery, and 7,700 cavalry, or an aggregate of 35,000.cox-franklin-nashville-selections-v2, p.12 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3162503ba1ef…The latter numbered 5,591, being less than half Hood's strength in that arm, but the infantry and artillery were 48,975.cox-franklin-nashville-selections-v2, p.18 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3162503ba1ef…Fourth Corps, 12,331; Twenty-third Corps, 10,624;cox-franklin-nashville-selections-v2, p.18 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3162503ba1ef…increased Wilson's cavalry to about seven thousand equipped,cox-franklin-nashville-selections-v2, p.67 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3162503ba1ef…did not reach him at the front till the 30th,cox-franklin-nashville-selections-v2, p.67 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3162503ba1ef…Total . 30, 600 40, 730 44, 719 88, 793 96, 367or45-1-hood-tennessee-selections-v2, p.663 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
947886786c78…Crossed Tennessee, November 21, 30,600 men.or45-1-hood-tennessee-selections-v2, p.663 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
947886786c78…terrain
supportedinherited Cox says Schofield's position was strong in front but had a river at its back; the river makes a horseshoe bend at the town, and the low north bank in the bend is commanded by the south bank. Hood says the Union line north of the river was considered quite strong in front.
The river and bend predate the engagement. Narrative descriptions from an interested history and report.
Schofield's position was a strong one if the attack were made upon him in front, but it had the great disadvantage of a river at his back.cox-franklin-nashville-selections-v2, p.66 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3162503ba1ef…The river at the town makes a horse-shoe bend to the south, and the land on the north bank in the bend is low, and completely commanded by that on the south.cox-franklin-nashville-selections-v2, p.66 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3162503ba1ef…which was considered quite strong in front.or45-1-hood-tennessee-selections-v2, p.652 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
947886786c78…supportedunresolved NPS says the Federals built two lines of earthworks south of the town; Cox says Schofield prepared an interior, shorter line and that Cox's own brigades north of the river built breastworks on indented lines against the Confederate artillery on the higher south bank.
Works built during the operations; not tagged as inherited.
The Federals built two lines of earthworks south of the townnps-tn034-v1, Description · snapshot
769adc3168ce…he informed Thomas of his purpose to prepare an interior and shorter line,cox-franklin-nashville-selections-v2, p.67 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3162503ba1ef…this was strengthened by breastworks on indented lines,cox-franklin-nashville-selections-v2, p.67 (OCR page markers; not checked against print) · snapshot
3162503ba1ef…Open questions
- Schofield's No. 96 report, Cox's own report and journal (Nos. 97–98), Stanley's, Wilson's and Forrest's accounts of Columbia, Lee's No. 237 report, the Nos. 2–7 returns and the Confederate strength returns cited by Cox remain deferred.
- NPS/CWSAC (the live NPS page and the frozen Arnold rows) is one family. Jacob D. Cox's The March to the Sea; Franklin and Nashville (1882) is an interested history by the commander of the Twenty-third Corps' Third Division (and, at Franklin, of both divisions of that corps) that draws on official papers. Corse's, French's, R. S. Granger's, Doolittle's, Sinclair's, Forrest's, Hood's and Rousseau's reports, printed in Official Records Series I, Volumes XXXIX part 1 and XLV part 1, are separate families of interested accounts; each volume is a shared container, not an additional witness. Report dates are not event times or proof of contemporary knowledge.
- No automatic commander attribution, causal campaign score, morale/readiness number or battle/campaign double counting.